The effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension

References

• Arai, M., van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 218–250. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney, & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-33.
   Google Scholar
• Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 931–949. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xlm/33/5/931/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112(2), 300–317. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, S., Kidd, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 539–570. doi:10.1515/COGL.2009.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. (2006). Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 2–16. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2006.00001.x/abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 468–481. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 833–849. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(03), 357–386. doi:10.1017/S0272263100012158
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Bock, K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Can thematic roles leave traces in their places?. Cognition, 90(1), 29–49. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 217–230. doi:10.1023/A:1005101313330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 185–198. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M., & Scheepers, C. (2002). Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 126–131. doi:10.3758/BF03196267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. doi:10.1080/01690960600824609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M. P., & Cohen, N. J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19(9), 940–946. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02180.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. ( in press). Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66(2), 297–316. doi:10.2307/414888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2007). Relative clauses in English conversation: Relativizers, frequency, and the notion of construction. Studies in Language, 31(2), 293–326. doi:10.1075/sl.31.2.03fox
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 161–187. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, M. L., & Goldberg, A. E. (1999). Structural priming: Purely syntactic?. In M. Hahn, & S. C. Stones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 208–211). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998a). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 62(2), 221–254. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998b). Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech, 41(2), 143–184. http://las.sagepub.com/content/41/2/143.full.pdf+html.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A(1), 129–147. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713755798.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 479–489. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in spanish-english bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75(2), B27–B39. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027799000803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. (2007). Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. In In L. Wolter & J. Thorson, University of Rochester working papers in the language sciences (Vol.3 (1), pp. 26–44).Rochester, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94(2), 113–147. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14s(5–6), 631–662. doi:10.1080/016909699386211
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 925–937. doi:10.3758/BF03193466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2012a). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. doi:10.1037/a0025405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2012b). Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(02), 393–418. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 860–897. doi:10.1080/01690960601155284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95(1), 95–127. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loebell, H., & Bock, K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41(5), 791–824. doi:10.1515/ling.2003.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., James, J. S., Schunn, C., Li, P., & Schneider, W. (2001). STEP—A system for teaching experimental psychology using E-Prime. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(2), 287–296. doi:10.3758/BF03195379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50–68. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1994). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313–330. http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J93/J93-2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(01), 79–103. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children's short and full passives. Cognition, 121(2), 268–274. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 469–488. doi:10.1007/BF02143162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. L., & Pickering, M. J. (1993). Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: Evidence from semantic priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, V22(2), 207–237. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01067831.
   Google Scholar
• Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 94–114. doi:10.1080/01690960902872793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Branigan, H. P. ( in press). Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10.1037/a0029181
   Google Scholar
• Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168–182. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat-Sala, M., Shillcock, R., & Sorace, A. (2000). Animacy effects on the production of object-dislocated descriptions by Catalan-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 97–117. doi:10.1017/S0305000999004031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2007). Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 380–395. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A Computational Cognitive Model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 348–379. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2007). Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 627–660. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. In M. Carreiras, & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERP and beyond, (pp. 167–185). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 163–196. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. -A., & Christianson, K. (2012). Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 62,931–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider, N. (2008). An exemplar model of structural priming ( PhD thesis). Stanford University, CA, Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, N. (2009). Similarity and structural priming. In N. A. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 815–820). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2011). The role of thematic roles in sentence processing: Evidence from structural priming in young children. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2009). Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35(1), 19–45. doi:10.1037/a0013984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernice, M., Pickering, M. J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 631–664. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.572468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubin, D. A. (1979). Discourse function of morphology: The focus system in German. In In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (Vol. 12, pp. 469–504). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar