Evidence for priming across intervening sentences during on-line sentence comprehension

References

• Arai, M., Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 218–250. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The english lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blozis, S. A., & Traxler, M. J. (2007). Analyzing individual differences in sentence processing performance using multilevel models. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 31–38. doi:10.3758/BF03192841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Dell, G., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Argument status and PP-attachment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(5), 385–403. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9021-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 468–481. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carminati, M., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2009, March). The Time Course of Structural Priming in Comprehension. Paper presented to the 22nd Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 217–229. doi:10.1023/A:1005101313330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Traxler, M. J., Williams, R., Mohammed, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 317–334. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00070-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech, 41, 143–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 862–878. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(2), 307–348. doi:10.1080/016909697386871
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Caplan, D., Sitnikova, T., Eddy, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 489–530. doi:10.1080/01690960500094279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed) (pp. 659–724). Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 18(2), 135–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2008). Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Readers vary in their use of plausibility information. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 375–391. doi:10.3758/MC.36.2.375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luka, B. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(3), 436–459. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2010). Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 2886–2898. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 586–605. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2011). Thematic processing during sentence comprehension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2004, March). Grammatical repetition and garden path effects. Paper presented to the CUNY Sentence Processing conference. College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). A paradox of syntactic priming: Why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e24209. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension – an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1662–1670. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Keller., F., & Dubey., A. (2010). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 333–351. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008a). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008b). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 188–213. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 156–163. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01462-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M. (2009). Syntactic priming in sentence comprehension: Mechanisms and time course ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2010). Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 925–937. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00249.x
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2009). Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 35, 19–45. doi:10.1037/a0013984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2008a). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(1), 149–155. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2008b). Structural priming among prepositional phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 659–674. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Bybee, M. D., & Pickering, M. J. (1997). Influence of connectives on language comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 50, 481–497. doi:10.1080/027249897391982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2005, March). Syntactic priming in comprehension. Paper presented to the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2008). Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), 609–645. doi:10.1080/01690960701639898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory & Language, 53(2), 204–224. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 4, 105–122. doi:10.1017/S1366728901000220
   Google Scholar
• Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75(2), 105–143. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar