Contingent categorisation in speech perception

References

• Allen, J. S., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D. (2003). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(1), 544. doi:10.1121/1.1528172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2011). lme 4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 099875-9.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E., & Stevens, K. N. (1979). Acoustic invariance in speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(4), 1001–1017. doi:10.1121/1.383319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E., & Stevens, K. N. (1980). Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(2), 648–62. doi:10.1121/1.383890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, V. J. (2002). Timing relations in speech and the identification of voice-onset times: A stable perceptual boundary for voicing categories across speaking rates. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(1), 121–130. doi:10.3758/BF03194561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carden, G., Levitt, A., Jusczyk, P. W., & Walley, A. (1981). Evidence for phonetic processing of cues to place of articulation: Perceived manner affects perceived place. Perception & Psychophysics, 29(1), 26–36. doi:10.3758/BF03198837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J., Linebaugh, G., Munson, C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach. Journal of phonetics, 38(2), 167–184. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, R. L., & Walsh, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(5), 2154–64. doi:10.1121/1.397864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. (2011). Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech, 54(1), 99–121. doi:10.1177/0023830910388017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Brown, J. M. (2000). Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(1), 21–32. doi:10.3758/BF03212058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Smith, M. (1986). Speech perception as “vector analysis”: An approach to the problems of segmentation and invariance. In J. S. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 126–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649–683. doi:10.1080/01690960500181332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, D. W. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 575–590. doi:10.3758/BF03194584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 4 2010, 865–892. 10.1515/LING.2010.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, L. L. (2006). The mean matters: Effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2801–2817. doi:10.1121/1.2354071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., Strand, E. A., & D'Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 359–384. doi:10.1006/jpho.1999.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(3 Pt 1), 1252–1263. doi:10.1121/1.1288413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 117–128. doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefte, M., & Kluender, K. R. (2008). Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 366–376. doi:10.1121/1.2804951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluender, K. R., Coady, J. A., & Kiefte, M. (2003). Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Commun, 41(1), 59–69. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00093-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., Gewirth, L., & Blumstein, S. E. (1984). A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: Evidence from a cross-language study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(2), 391–404. doi:10.1121/1.391580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y., Dutton, L., & Ram, G. (2010). The role of speaker gender identification in relative fundamental frequency height estimation from multispeaker, brief speech segments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 384–8. doi:10.1121/1.3397514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1996). Role of articulation in speech perception: Clues from production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(3), 1683–1692. doi:10.1121/1.414691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-langage study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotto, A. J., & Kluender, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(4), 602–619. doi:10.3758/BF03206049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., & Holt, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(2), 1134–1140. doi:10.1121/1.419865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnuson, J. S., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2007). Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 391–409. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(3), 213–228. doi:10.3758/BF03204377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1064–1071. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Cole, J. S., & Munson, C. (2011). Features as an emergent product of computing perceptual cues relative to expectations. In R. Ridouane & N. Clement (Eds.), Where do features come from? (pp. 197–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011). What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological Review, 118(2), 219–246. doi:10.1037/a0022325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermelstein, P. (1978). On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(4), 331–336. doi:10.3758/BF03199717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., Green, K. P., & Reeves, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look a the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43(1–3), 106–115. doi:10.1159/000261764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nearey, T. M. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3241–54. doi:10.1121/1.418290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nearey, T. M., & Rochet, B. L. (1994). Effects of place of articulation and vowel context on VOT production and perception for French and English stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 24(1), 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0025100300004965
   Google Scholar
• Niedzielski, N. (1999). The Effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. doi:10.1177/0261927X99018001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, H. C., & Magnuson, J. S. (1997). Talker normalization: Phonetic constancy as a cognitive process. In K Johnson & J. W. Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 109–132). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5(1), 42–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oden, G. C. (1978). Integration of place and voicing information in the identification of synthetic stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85(3), 172–191. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohala, J. J. (1996). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(3), 1718–1725. doi:10.1121/1.414696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, J. S., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Perceiving the causes of coarticulatory acoustic variation: Consonant voicing and vowel pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 1141–1152. doi:10.3758/BF03205527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics, 32(2), 141–152. doi:10.3758/BF03204273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhone, A. E., & Jongman, A. (2012). Modified locus equations categorize stop place in a perceptually realistic time frame. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), EL487–EL491. doi:10.1121/1.4722169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J., & Pisoni, D. (1974). On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 181–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. (2009). Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 236–264. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00112.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smits, R. (2001a). Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(7), 1109–1139. doi:10.3758/BF03194529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, R. (2001b). Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1145–1162. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, E. A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 86–100. doi:10.1177/0261927X99018001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, E. A., & Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In D. Gibbon (Ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS conference (pp. 14–26). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 1074–1095. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.1074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., Hilbert, J., & Sirosh, J. (1998). Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraint. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(02), 241–299. 10.1017/S0140525X98001174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, H. M., & Shore, J. (1996). Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(6), 936–946. doi:10.3758/BF03205495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 434–464. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01077.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2012). Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0306-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, N., Fowler, C. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2009). A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 74–79. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. Perception and Psychophysics, 46(3), 284–292. doi:10.3758/BF03208093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H. (1992). Perception of overlapping segments: Thoughts on Nearey's model. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 493–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32(1), 25–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar