865
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Integrating research disciplines in speech production

Prediction at all levels: forward model predictions can enhance comprehension

, &
Pages 46-48 | Received 31 Aug 2013, Accepted 02 Oct 2013, Published online: 08 Nov 2013

References

  • Adank, P. (2012). The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood (ALE) meta-analyses. Brain and Language, 122(1), 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014
  • Adank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 21, 1903–1909. doi:10.1177/0956797610389192
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
  • D'Ausilio, A., Bufalari, I., Salmas, P., & Fadiga, L. (2012). The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds. Cortex, 48, 882–887. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.017
  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
  • DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
  • De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker's turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515–535. doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130
  • Hickok, G. (2012a). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145. doi:10.1038/nrg3118
  • Hickok, G. (2012b). The cortical organization of speech processing: Feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual stream model. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 393–402. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.004
  • Hickok, G. (2013). Predictive coding? Yes, but from what source? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 358. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12002750
  • Hickok, G. (2014). The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.834370
  • Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C. (2012). Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1439–1449. doi:10.1037/a0027862
  • Laver, J. D. M. (1980). Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 287–305). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
  • Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63(1), 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–392. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
  • Scott, S. K., McGettigan, C., & Eisner, F. (2009). A little more conversation, a little less action: Candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 295–302. doi:10.1038/nrn2603
  • Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2013). The effect of imagination on stimulation: The functional specificity of efference copies in speech processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1020–1036. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21324
  • Venezia, J. H., Saberi, K., Chubb, C., & Hickok, G. (2012). Response bias modulates the speech motor system during syllable discrimination. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 157. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00157
  • Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.