Never seem to find the time: evaluating the physiological time course of visual word recognition with regression analysis of single-item event-related potentials

References

• Amsel, B. D. (2011). Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 970–983. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsel, B. D., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2013). Alive and grasping: Stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability. NeuroImage, 77, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. J. (2001). Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 626–639. doi:10.1139/f01-004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2006). 10 Attentional control and the flexible lexical processor: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition. In Sally Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing, 229. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, H. A., Doñamayor, N., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. (2010). Parafoveal N400 effect during sentence reading. Neuroscience Letters, 479(2), 152–156. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H. A., Ben-Zvi, S., Bentin, S., & Kutas, M. (2011). Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 523–531. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01082.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain and Cognition, 14, 201–212. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(90)90029-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R. C., & Karniski, W. (1993). An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 30, 518–524. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02075.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Andoni Dunabeitia, J., & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2659–2670. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Perea, M., Vergara, M., & Pollatsek, A. (2009). The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. Psychophysiology, 46(5), 1113–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels versus consonants. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 183–200. doi:10.1080/01690960701579839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults' “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42, 205–238. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170–187. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020306
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & performance IV (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Braun, M., Wille, K., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1852–1870. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., & Kliegl, R. (2007). Synchronizing timelines: Relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading. Brain Research, 1155, 147–162. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hoffman, M., & Jacobs, A.M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkanen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110, 293–321. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Kliegl, R., & Sommer, W. (2012). Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials. NeuroImage, 62, 381–393. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfield, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Coregrestriation of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 552–572. doi:10.1037/a0023885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95–111. doi:10.1002/hbm.10010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufau, S., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An ERP investigation of location invariance in masked repetition priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 222–228. doi:10.3758/CABN.8.2.222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A. (2001). A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 345–348. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00053-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., & Richter, E. Kliegl. R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Dickson, D. S. ( in press). A common neural progression to meaning in about a third of a second. In G. S. Hickok & S. L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language. Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Mai, H., & Kutas, M. (2005). Both sides get the point: Bihemispheric sensitivity to sentential constraint. Memory and Cognition, 33, 871–886. doi:10.3758/BF03193082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D., & Lane, D. (1983). A nonstochastic interpretation of reported significance levels. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1, 292–298.
   Google Scholar
• Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 123–144. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00244-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for “common sense”: An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(2), 89–106. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613–656. doi:10.1080/016909697386646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvea, A.C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 149–188. doi:10.1080/01690960902965951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128–156. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (1999). Brain responses during sentence reading: Visual input affects central processes. NeuroReport, 10(15), 3175–3178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, E., Dhond, R. P., Christensen, N., Van Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J. D., & Dale, A. M. (2002). N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage, 17(3), 1101–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Coutout, C., Holden, A., & Chen, Y. (2012). The time-course of single-word reading: Evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses. NeuroImage, 60, 1462–1477. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage, 30, 1383–1400. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090–1103. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Pulvermuller, F., Ford, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG. Biological Psychology, 80, 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1631–1643. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 721–742. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 244(2), 61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Jacobs, A. M., & Sommer, W. (2012). Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychological Research, 76, 145–158. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0376-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga, K., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2007). Masked cross-modal repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 337–376. doi:10.1080/01690960600652471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804–823. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11, 539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S. (2011). What goes up, must come down: Multiple regression analysis of single-item ERPs reveals yoked oscillation of orthographic and semantic processing. Psychophysiology, 48, S43. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Better the DVL you know: Acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single word reading, Psychological Science, 18, 122–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). Minding the PS, queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of semantic processing across multiple stimulus types. Psychophysiology, 45, 458–466. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00636.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326–338. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48, 176–186. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Plaut, D. C. (2012). A neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model of event-related potential word reading data. Brain and Language, 120, 271–281. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., Stites, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). Won't get fooled again: An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 257–274. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.606667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(4), 538–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, M., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19, 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Holcomb, P. (2010). Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: An ERP investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2012). Masked repetition priming of letter-in-string identification: An ERP investigation. Brain Research.
   Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2011). When less is more: Feedback, priming, and the pseudoword superiority effect. Brain research, 1386, 153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language. Retrieved from http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
   Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Wieringa, B. M., Weyerts, H., Szentkuti, A., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (2001). Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia, 39(1), 91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from: http://usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327–357. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McKinnon, R. (1997). Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biological Psychology, 46(2), 143–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller, K. A., Gonsalves, B., Grabowecky, M., Bozic, V. S., & Yamada, S. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of recollecting faces of known and unknown individuals. Neuroimage, 11(2), 98–110. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, J. P., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 674–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and lexical access in reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner, Comprehension processes in reading (pp 143–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princeton University. (2010). About WordNet. Retrieved from http://wordnet.princeton.edu
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermuller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–336. doi:10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 187–189. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00092-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Clifton, Jr. C. (2009). Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology, 80, 4–9. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201. doi:10.3758/BF03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2012a). Eye movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity. Visual Cognition, 20, 360–390. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.667006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2012b). Using E-Z reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–185. doi:10.1037/a0026473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: Using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48, 993–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01169.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. L. T., Gonnerman, L., & Plaut, D. C. ( Under Review). An improved model of semantic similarity based on lexical co-occurrence. Cognitive Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Caharel, S. (2011). ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception. Vision Research, 51, 1297–1311. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. (2008). Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage, 39, 1959–1979. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. (2011). The N170: Understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ERP components (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 18, 367–379. doi:10.3758/BF03197126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M.D., & Nagy, M.E. (1987). Lexical contribution ot nonword repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 15, 473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240–251. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3530240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence for transfer appropriate processing of memory: Processing versus feature similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 612–619. doi:10.3758/BF03196810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3), 398–409. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00142-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segalowitz, S. J., & Zheng, X. (2009). An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biological psychology, 80(1), 122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 489–493. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 2195–2200. doi:10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D. A., Lewis, G., & Marantz, A. (2012). Disambiguating form and lexical frequency effects in MEG responses using homonyms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 275–287. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.607712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454–461. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Perea, M., Marín, A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: An ERP study. Brain and language, 118(3), 105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024–1037. doi:10.1162/08989290051137558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3001–3014. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. P., & Rugg, M. D. (1992). Word Frequency and Multiple Repetition as Determinants of the Modulation of Event-Related Potentials in a Semantic Classification Task. Psychophysiology, 29(6), 664–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar