Recursive process of motion recognition and generation for action-based interaction

References

• Donald M. Origin of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. 2001;661–670.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese V, Goldman A. Mirror neuron and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cognit. Sci. 1998;2:493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuniyoshi Y, Inaba M, Inoue H. Learning by watching: extracting reusable task knowledge from visual observation of human performance. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 1994;10:799–822.
   Google Scholar
• Morimoto J, Doya K. Hierarchical reinforcement learning for motion learning: learning “stand-up” trajectories. Adv. Robot. 1999;13:267–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mataric MJ. Getting humaniods to move and imitate. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2000;15:18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruno M, Wolpert D, Kawato M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 2001;13:2201–2220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tani J, Ito M. Self-organization of behavioral primitives as multiple attractor dynamics: a robot experiment. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2003;33:481–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata T, Matsumoto S, Tani J, Komatani K, Okuno HG. Human-robot cooperation using quasi-symbols generated by RNNPB model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2007; Roma, Italy. p. 2156–2161.
   Google Scholar
• Okada M, Nakamura D, Nakamura Y. On-line and hierarchical design methods of dynamics based information processing system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’03); 2003; Las Vegas, USA. p. 954–959.
   Google Scholar
• Inamura T, Toshima I, Tanie H, Nakamura Y. Embodied symbol emergence based on mimesis theory. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2004;23:363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billard A, Siegwart R. Robot learning from demonstration. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 2004;47:65–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulic D, Takano W, Nakamura Y. Representability of human motions by factorial hidden markov models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ 2007 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2007; San Diego, USA. p. 2388–2393.
   Google Scholar
• Takano W, Nakamura Y. Integrating whole body motion primitives and natural language for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots; 2008; Daejon, Korea. p. 708–713.
   Google Scholar
• Takano W, Nakamura Y. Statistically integrated semiotics that enables mutual inference between linguistic and behavioral symbols for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2009; Kobe, Japan. p. 646–652.
   Google Scholar
• Takano W, Yamane K, SugiharaT, Yamamoto K, Nakamura Y. Primitive communication based on motion recognition and generation with hierarchical mimesis model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2006; Orlando, USA. p. 3602–3609.
   Google Scholar
• Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1978;1:515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth G, Jarrett N. What minds have in common is space: spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 1991;9:55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breazeal C, Scassellati B. Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caretaker. Adapt. Behav. 2000;8:49–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozima H, Yano H. A robot that learns to communicate with human categivers. In: Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics; 2001; Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai S, Hosoda K, Morita A, Asada M. Emergence of joint attention through bootstrap learning based on the mechanisms of visual attention and learning with self-evaluation. Jpn. Soc. Artif. Intell. 2004;19:10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pedica C, Vilhjalmsson HH. Spontaneous avatar behavior for human territoriality. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2010;24:575–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues RA, Lima Bicho A, Paravisi M, Jung CR, Magalhães LP, Musse SR. Tree paths: a new model for steering behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents; 2009; Amsterdam, Netherlands. p. 358–371.
   Google Scholar
• Snape J, Berg JVD, Guy SJ, Manocha D. The hybrid reciprocal velocity obstacle. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2011;27:696–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg JVD, Guy SJ, Lin M, Manocha D. Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Robotics Research; 2011; Flagstaff, USA. p. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura Y, Fukuzawa T, Asama H. Smooth collision avoidance in human-robot coexisting environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2010; Taipei, Taiwan. p. 3887–3892.
   Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Zanlungo F, Hayashi K, Kanda T. Towards a socially acceptable collision avoidance for a mobile robot navigating among pedestrians using a pedestrian model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2014;6:443–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratsamee P, Mae Y, Ohara K, Takubo T, Arai T. Human-robot collision avoidance using a modified social force model with body pose and face orientation. Int. J. HR. 2013; 10: 1350008-1–1350008-24.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiner L, Juang BH. Fundamentals of speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall; 1993.
   Google Scholar