A postural control model incorporating multisensory inputs for maintaining a musculoskeletal model in a stance posture

References

• Nashner LM, Black FO, Wall C, et al. Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J Neurosci. 1982;2:536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba R, Ogawa H, Takakusaki K, et al. Muscle activities changing model by difference in sensory inputs on human posture control. In: Intelligent autonomous systems 12. Springer; 2013. p. 479–491.
   Google Scholar
• Karim H, Fuhrman SI, Sparto P, et al. Functional brain imaging of multi-sensory vestibular processing during computerized dynamic posturography using near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2013;74:318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikema DJ, Hatzitaki V, Tzovaras D, et al. Application of intermittent galvanic vestibular stimulation reveals age-related constraints in the multisensory reweighting of posture. Neurosci Lett. 2014;561:112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Agada P, Kiemel T, et al. Dynamic reweighting of three modalities for sensor fusion. PloS One. 2014;9:e88132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:1097–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ. Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:410–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo AD. An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance. J Neural Eng. 2005;2:S235–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo S, Massaquoi SG. A model of cerebellum stabilized and scheduled hybrid long-loop control of upright balance. Biol Cybern. 2004;91:188–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masani K, Vette AH, Kawashima N, et al. Neuromusculoskeletal torque-generation process has a large destabilizing effect on the control mechanism of quiet standing. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1465–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottaro A, Casadio M, Morasso PG, et al. Body sway during quiet standing: is it the residual chattering of an intermittent stabilization process? Human Movement Sci. 2005;24:588–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottaro A, Yasutake Y, Nomura T, et al. Bounded stability of the quiet standing posture: an intermittent control model. Human Movement Sci. 2008;27:473–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk P, Glendinning P, Brown M, et al. Modelling human balance using switched systems with linear feedback control. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9:234–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawthrop P, Loram I, Lakie M, et al. Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control. Biol Cybern. 2011;104:31–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Nomura T, Morasso P. Stability of a double inverted pendulum model during human quiet stance with continuous delay feedback control. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC; 2011; p. 7450–7453.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Nomura T, Casadio M, et al. Intermittent control with ankle, hip, and mixed strategies during quiet standing: a theoretical proposal based on a double inverted pendulum model. J Theor Biol. 2012;310:55–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, et al. A multisensory integration model of human stance control. Biol Cybern. 1999;80:299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, et al. An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control. Biol Cybern. 2001;84:103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo AD. An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42:87–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettich G, Fennell L, Mergner T. Double inverted pendulum model of reactive human stance control [Internet]. Multibody dynamics conference; 2011. Available from: http://www.posturob.uniklinik-freiburg.de
   Google Scholar
• Mergner T. A neurological view on reactive human stance control. Ann Rev Control. 2010;34:177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebenay M, Lippi V, Mergener T. Human-like humanoid robot posture control. In: 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO); 2015. p. 304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Clark AE. Biarticular muscles influence postural responses: implications for treatment of stiff-knee gait [master’s thesis]. University of Tennessee; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chiba R, Takakusaki K, Ota J, et al. Human upright posture control models based on multisensory inputs; in fast and slow dynamics. Neurosci Res. 2016;104:96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens B. Humanoid push recovery. In: 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots; IEEE; 2007. p. 589–595.
   Google Scholar
• Yasin A, Huang Q, Xu Q, et al. Biped robot push detection and recovery. In: International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA); IEEE; 2012. p. 993–998.
   Google Scholar
• Nenchev DN, Nishio A. Ankle and hip strategies for balance recovery of a biped subjected to an impact. Robotica. 2008;26:643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, et al. Opensim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:1940–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard M, Uchida T, Seth A, et al. Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135:021005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au C. Gait 2392 and 2354 models [Internet]; 2013. Available from: http://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:8080/display/OpenSim/Gait+2392+and+2354+Models.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan A, Modenese L, Phillips AT. A novel computational framework for deducing muscle synergies from experimental joint moments. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014;8:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalshøi O, Iversen CH, Nielsen DB, et al. Walking patterns and hip contact forces in patients with hip dysplasia. Gait Posture. 2015;42:529–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt K, Crossley F. Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J Appl Mech. 1975;42:440–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks J. Simulation-based design to prevent ankle injuries [Internet]; 2014. Available from: http://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:8080/display/OpenSim/Simulation-Based+Design+to+Prevent+Ankle+Injuries.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1988;17:359–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters JM. An improved muscle-reflex actuator for use in large-scale neuromusculoskeletal models. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:359–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs DA. First-order activation dynamics [Internet]; 2015. Available from: http://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:8080/display/OpenSim/First-Order+Activation+Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple T, et al. Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults. J Physiol. 1999;514:915–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Burke D, Gandevia SC. Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:3994–4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitmann S, Ferns N, Breakspear M. Muscle co-contraction modulates damping and joint stability in a three-link biomechanical limb. Front Neurorobot. 2011;5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hof A, Gazendam M, Sinke W. The condition for dynamic stability. J Biomech. 2005;38:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai YC, Patton J. Center of mass velocity-position predictions for balance control. J Biomech. 1997;30:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermann M, Van den Bogert AJ. Predictive simulation of gait in rehabilitation. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology; IEEE; 2010: p. 5444–5447.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang P, Chiba R, Takakusaki K, et al. Generation of the human biped stance by a neural controller able to compensate neurological time delay. PloS One. 2016;11:e0163212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen N, Müller SD, Koumoutsakos P. Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (cma-es). Evol Comput. 2003;11:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The CMA evolution strategy [Internet]; 2015. Available from: https://www.lri.fr/hansen/cmaesintro.html.
   Google Scholar
• Warnica MJ, Weaver TB, Prentice SD, et al. The influence of ankle muscle activation on postural sway during quiet stance. Gait Posture. 2014;39:1115–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Oviedo G, Ting LH. Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:2144–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F. Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol. 2004;556:267–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An Q, Ishikawa Y, Nakagawa J, et al. Measurement of just noticeable difference of hip joint for implementation of self-efficacy: in active and passive sensation and in different speed. Adv Rob. 2014;28:505–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn TW, Wang JM, Hicks JL, et al. Predictive simulation generates human adaptations during loaded and inclined walking. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar