Novel approaches to control multiple tasks in redundant manipulators: stability analysis and performance evaluation

References

• De Luca A, Flacco F. Integrated control for pHRI: collision avoidance, detection, reaction and collaboration. In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob); Rome, Italy: IEEE; 2012. p. 288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghian H, Villani L, Kamranian Z, et al. Visual servoing with safe interaction using image moments. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); Hamburg, Germany; 2015. Sep. p. 5479–5485.
   Google Scholar
• Aghakhani N, Geravand M, Shahriari N, et al. Task control with remote center of motion constraint for minimally invasive robotic surgery. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Karlsruhe, Germany; 2013 May. p. 5807–5812.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Khatib O. Multi-link multi-contact force control for manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Barcelona, Spain; 2005 Apr. p. 3613–3618.
   Google Scholar
• Sentis L, Petersen J, Philippsen R. Implementation and stability analysis of prioritized whole-body compliant controllers on a wheeled humanoid robot in uneven terrains. Autonom Robots. 2013;35(4):301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatib O, Chung SY. Suprapeds: humanoid contact-supported locomotion for 3D unstructured environments. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); Hong Kong, China; 2014 May. p. 2319–2325.
   Google Scholar
• Liu M, Tan Y, Padois V. Generalized hierarchical control. Autonom Robots. 2016;40(1):17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano B, Slotine JJE. A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. In: Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 1991’. Robots in Unstructured Environments’. 91 ICAR; Pisa, Italy: IEEE; 1991. p. 1211–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Mistry M, Nakanishi J, Schaal S. Task space control with prioritization for balance and locomotion. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS 2007; San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE; 2007. p. 331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghian H, Villani L, Keshmiri M, et al. Dynamic multi-priority control in redundant robotic systems. Robotica. 2013;31(7):1155–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentis L, Park J, Khatib O. Compliant control of multicontact and center-of-mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Trans Rob. 2010 Jun;26(3):483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaverini S. Singularity-robust task-priority redundancy resolution for real-time kinematic control of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Rob Automat. 1997 Jun;13(3):398–410.
   Google Scholar
• Escande A, Mansard N, Wieber PB. Hierarchical quadratic programming: Fast online humanoid-robot motion generation. Int J Rob Res. 2014;33(7):1006–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caccavale F, Chiaverini S, Siciliano B. Second-order kinematic control of robot manipulators with Jacobian damped least-squares inverse: theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 1997;2(3):188–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaverini S, Siciliano B, Egeland O. Review of the damped least-squares inverse kinematics with experiments on an industrial robot manipulator. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 1994;2(2):123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Flacco F, De Luca A. A reverse priority approach to multi-task control of redundant robots. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014); Chicago, IL, USA; IEEE; 2014. p. 2421–2427.
   Google Scholar
• Mistry M, Buchli J, Schaal S. Inverse dynamics control of floating base systems using orthogonal decomposition. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Anchorage, AK, USA; May; 2010. p. 3406–3412
   Google Scholar
• Caccavale F, Natale C, Siciliano B, et al. Resolved-acceleration control of robot manipulators: a critical review with experiments. Robotica. 1998 Sep;16(5):565–573. DOI:10.1017/S0263574798000290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi J, Cory R, Mistry M, et al. Operational space control: a theoretical and empirical comparison. Int J Rob Res. 2008;27(6):737–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi M, Behzadipour S, Vossoughi G. Model reference adaptive impedance control in cartesian coordinates for physical human--robot interaction. Adv Rob. 2014;28(19):1277–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortesão R, Dominici M. Robot force control on a beating heart. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2017 Aug;22(4):1736–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemiti N, Morel G, Ortmaier T, et al. Mechatronic design of a new robot for force control in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2007 Apr;12(2):143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luh J, Walker M, Paul R. Resolved-acceleration control of mechanical manipulators. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1980;25(3):468–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghian H, Villani L, Keshmiri M, et al. Task-space control of robot manipulators with null-space compliance. IEEE Trans Rob. 2014;30(2):493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott C, Dietrich A, Albu-Schäffer A. Prioritized multi-task compliance control of redundant manipulators. Automatica. 2015;53:416–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu P, Mauser J, Sastry S. Dynamic control of redundant manipulators. J Rob Syst. 1989;6(2):133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil KA. Divergence of linear acceleration-based redundancy resolution schemes. IEEE Trans Robot Automat. 2002 Aug;18(4):625–631.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghian H, Keshmiri M, Villani L, et al. Priority oriented adaptive control of kinematically redundant manipulators. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Saint Paul, MN, USA; 2012 May. p. 293–298.
   Google Scholar
• Yanai H, Takeuchi K, Takane Y. Projection matrices, generalized inverse matrices, and singular value decomposition. Statistics for social and behavioral sciences. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ott C. Cartesian impedance control of redundant and flexible-joint robots. Springer tracts in advanced robotics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nemec B, Žlajpah L, Omrcen D. Comparison of null-space and minimal null-space control algorithms. Robotica. 2007;25(5):511–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. Advanced robotics: Redundancy and optimization. 1st ed. Boston (MA): Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib O. A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: the operational space formulation. IEEE J Rob Automat. 1987;3(1):43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sepulchre R, Jankovic M, Kokotovic PV. Constructive nonlinear control. Communications and control engineering. London: Springer; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Boullion TL, Odell PL. Generalized inverse matrices. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Luca AD, Albu-Schaffer A, Haddadin S, et al. Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; Beijing, China; 2006 Oct. p. 1623–1630.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Tan Y, Wang G, et al. On stability properties of nonlinear time-varying systems by semi-definite time-varying lyapunov candidates. IFAC Proc. 2008;41(2):1123–1128. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667016391029
   Google Scholar
• Khalil HK, Grizzle J. Nonlinear systems. 3rd Edition. (NJ): Prentice hall; 1996.
   Google Scholar