Developments and clinical evaluations of robotic exoskeleton technology for human upper-limb rehabilitation

References

• Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, et al. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):3–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopura RARC, Bandara DSV, Kiguchi K, et al. Developments in hardware systems of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: a review. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;75:203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molteni F, Gasperini G, Cannaviello G, et al. Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: narrative review. PM R. 2018;10(9):S174–S188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimaldi G, Manto M. Functional impacts of exoskeleton-based rehabilitation in chronic stroke: multi-joint versus single-joint robotic training. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(9):913–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “About Stroke,” 2019. [Online]. [cited: 27 Nov 2019]. Available from: https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke.
   Google Scholar
• Manna SK, Bhaumik S. A bioinspired 10 DOF wearable powered arm exoskeleton for rehabilitation. J Robot. 2013;2013:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C. Mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(12):3049–3091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duret C, Grosmaire A, Krebs HI. Robot-assisted therapy in upper extremity hemiparesis: overview of an evidence-based approach. Front Neurol. 2019;10(April):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Losey DP, McDonald CG, Battaglia E, et al. A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human–robot interaction. Appl Mech Rev. 2018;70(1):10804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biroua FI. Development and testing of a mixed feedback control system for robotic hand exoskeleton. 2019 15th international conference on engineering of modern electric systems (EMES); IEEE; 2019. p. 17–20
   Google Scholar
• Pirondini E, Coscia M, Marcheschi S, et al. Evaluation of the effects of the arm light exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: a pilot study on healthy subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle D. Clinical evaluation of an upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury [PhD diss]. Rice University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bertani R, Melegari C, De Cola MC, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(9):1561–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Unger J, Zariffa J, et al. Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review. Disability Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2018;13(7):704–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao F, Gao Y, Wang Y, et al. Design and evaluation of a 7-DOF cable-driven upper limb exoskeleton. J Mech Sci Technol. 2018;32(2):855–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Tu X, He J. Design and evaluation of the RUPERT wearable upper extremity exoskeleton robot for clinical and in-home therapies. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybern: Syst. 2016;46(7):926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Wang X, Chen B, et al. Patient-active control of a powered exoskeleton targeting upper limb rehabilitation training. Front Neurol. 2018;9(October):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisoli A, Sotgiu E, Procopio C, et al. Training and assessment of upper limb motor function with a robotic exoskeleton after stroke. 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob); 2012. p. 1782–1787.
   Google Scholar
• Péter O, Fazekas G, Zsiga K, et al. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy: review and recommendations for future clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res. 2011;34(3):196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng B, Zhang Y, Meng W, et al. Bilateral robots for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(7):587–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, Van Wegen EEH, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Li-Tsang CWP, Au RKC. Robotic approaches for the rehabilitation of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40(1):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiloyannis M, Chiaradia D, Frisoli A, et al. Physiological and kinematic effects of a soft exosuit on arm movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassert R, Dietz V. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1772–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener R, Lünenburger L, Colombo G. Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):679–693.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietz V, Fouad K. Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. Brain. 2014;137(3):654–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal-Crespo L, McHughen S, Cramer SC, et al. The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task. Exp Brain Res. 2010;201(2):209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger J-C, Lambercy O, Califfi A, et al. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli L, Krewer C, Gassert R, et al. Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9(1):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saposnik G, Levin M, Stroke outcome research Canada (SORCan) working group, virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1380–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung EYY, Ng TKW, Yu KKK, et al. Robot-assisted training for people with spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(11):2320–2331.e12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Li Z, Zhao K, et al. Synergy-based control of assistive lower-limb exoskeletons by skill transfer. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics:2019;4435(c).
   Google Scholar
• Wei D, Li Z, Wei Q, et al. Human-in-the-loop control strategy of unilateral exoskeleton robots for gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. 2019;8920(c).
   Google Scholar
• Science E. A bioinspired 10 DOF wearable powered arm exoskeleton for rehabilitation. J Robot. 2013;2013(December):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Li Y, Bai S. A human-centered design optimization approach for robotic exoskeletons through biomechanical simulation. Rob Auton Syst. 2017;91:337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Agrawal SK. Design of a cable-driven arm exoskeleton (CAREX) for neural rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Robot. 2012;28(4):922–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Su C, Li G, et al. Fuzzy Approximation-based adaptive backstepping control of an exoskeleton for human upper limbs. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2015;23(3):555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Xiao S, Ge SS, et al. Constrained multilegged robot system modeling and fuzzy control with uncertain kinematics and dynamics incorporating foot force optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. Jan. 2016;46(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu EC, Wang R, Huq R, et al. Development of a robotic device for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a user-centered design approach. Paladyn, J Behav Robot. 2011;2(4):176–184.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew RP, Mica EJ, Meinhold W, et al. Introduction and initial exploration of an active/passive exoskeleton framework for portable assistance. IEEE Int Conf Intell Robot Syst. 2015;2015 (Decmber):5351–5356.
   Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. Dielectric elastomers as actuators for upper limb prosthetics: challenges and opportunities. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(4):403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiguchi K, Rahman MH, Sasaki M, et al. Development of a 3DOF mobile exoskeleton robot for human upper-limb motion assist. Rob Auton Syst. 2008;56(8):678–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain SK. A study of 200 cases of congenital limb deficiencies. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994;18(3):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotland TR, Galway HR. A long-term review of children with congenital and acquired upper limb deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65-B(3):346–349.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal PM. Strokes in young in India. J Int Med Sci Acad. 2004;17(2):79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Warlow C, Sudlow C, Dennis M, et al. Stroke. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1211–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Sample Survey Office. Disabled persons in India: a statistical profile, pp. 0–107, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 update, 2004 Updat., p. 146, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, et al. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(1):43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Cerebral palsy,” 2016. [Online]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cerebral-palsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20353999.
   Google Scholar
• Elkouzi DA. “Understanding Parkinson’s.” [Online]. Available from: http://www.parkinson.org/understanding-parkinsons/what-is-parkinsons.
   Google Scholar
• Bélaise C, Maso FD, Michaud B, et al. An EMG-marker tracking optimisation method for estimating muscle forces. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2017;42:119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyoncu M. Design and actuator Selection of a lower extremity exoskeleton. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2014;19(2):623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasiri MDSD, Ranaweera RKPS, Gopura RARC. Development of a surface muscle pressure monitoring system for wearable robotic devices. 2019 Moratuwa engineering research conference (MERCon); 2019. p. 544–549.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekara JMP, Gopura RARC, Jayawardane TSS, et al. Control methodologies for upper limb exoskeleton robots. 2012 IEEESICE international symposium on system integration (SII); 2012. p. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Li Z. Cooperative manipulation of wearable dual-arm exoskeletons using force communication between partners. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;0046(c):1.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Li Z, Kan Z, et al. Reference trajectory reshaping optimization and control of robotic exoskeletons for human-robot co-manipulation. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal MZ. Signal acquisition using surface EMG and circuit design considerations for robotic prosthesis. In: Naik GR, editor. Computational intelligence in electromyography analysis. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2012. p. 427–448 https://doi.org/10.5772/52556.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Quraishi MS, Elamvazuthi I, Daud SA, et al. Eeg-based control for upper and lower limb exoskeletons and prostheses: a systematic review. Sensors (Switzerland). 2018;18(10):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan J, Kalani A, Dwivedy SK. Reference trajectory based Jacobian transpose control of a novel lower limb exoskeleton system for children. 2019 5th international conference on signal processing, computing and control (ISPCC); 2019. p. 102–107,
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan Y, Gobee S, Durairajah V. Development of an upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation with feedback from EMG and IMU sensor. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;76(Iris):53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yue C, Lin X, Zhang X, et al. Design and performance evaluation of a wearable sensing system for lower-limb exoskeleton. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8610458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Du ZJ, Wang W, et al. Development of a wearable exoskeleton rehabilitation system based on hybrid control mode. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2016;13(5):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Yuan Y, Luo L, et al. Hybrid brain/muscle signals powered wearable walking exoskeleton enhancing motor ability in climbing stairs activity. IEEE Trans Med Rob Bionics. 2019;1(4):218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Anam K, Al-Jumaily AA. Active exoskeleton control systems: state of the art. Procedia Eng. 2012;41(Iris):988–994.
   Google Scholar
• He W, Li Z, Dong Y, et al. Design and adaptive control for an upper limb robotic exoskeleton in presence of input saturation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2019;30(1):97–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bembli S, Haddad NK, Belghith S. Robustness analysis of an upper limb exoskeleton controlled by sliding mode algorithm. Mech, Mach, Rob Mechatron Sci. 2019;58:99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kang HB, Wang JH. Adaptive control of 5 DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with improved safety. ISA Trans. 2013;52(6):844–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Du Z, Cong L, et al. Active disturbance rejection control based human gait tracking for lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton. ISA Trans. 2017;67:389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Li J, Zhao S, et al. Adaptive neural control of a Kinematically Redundant exoskeleton robot using brain-machine interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2019;30(12):3558–3571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong U, In HK, Cho KJ. Implementation of various control algorithms for hand rehabilitation exercise using wearable robotic hand. Intell Serv Rob. 2013;6(4):181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Chu B, Rogers E. Iterative learning control for robotic-assisted upper limb stroke rehabilitation in the presence of muscle fatigue. Control Eng Pract. 2014;31:63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AM, Pretty CG, Adams M, et al. Review of upper limb hybrid exoskeletons. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017;50(1):15169–15178.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Ward J, Sugar T, et al. Characterization of the dynamic properties of pneumatic muscle actuators. 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics; 2007. p. 764–770,
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell DG, Razak A, Goodwin M. Braided pneumatic muscle actuators. IFAC Proc. 1993;26(1):522–527.
   Google Scholar
• van Ninhuijs B, van der Heide LA, Jansen JW, et al. Overview of actuated arm support systems and their applications. Actuators. 2013;2(4):86–110.
   Google Scholar
• Herr H. Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp AS, Chapman EM, Cienfuegos PJ. Modeling and analysis of hydraulic piston actuation of McKibben fluidic artificial muscles for hand rehabilitation. Int J Rob Res. 2019: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364919872251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atia MGB, Salah O, Medhat B, et al. Design and analysis of low cost upper limb exoskeleton. 2017 12th international conference on computer engineering and systems (ICCES); 2017. p. 80–84.
   Google Scholar
• “Cyberdyne HAL.” [Online]. Available from: https://www.cyberdyne.jp.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Huang B, Ajoudani A, et al. Asymmetric Bimanual control of dual-Arm exoskeletons for human-cooperative Manipulations. IEEE Trans Robot. 2018;34(1):264–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh J. Rewalk: robotic exoskeletons for spinal cord injury. CADTH Issues Emerg Heal Technol. 2015;141:1–12. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/ReWalk_Robotic_Exoskeletons_for_Spinal_Cord_Injury_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bogue R. Exoskeletons and robotic prosthetics: a review of recent developments. Ind Robot: Int J. 2009;36(5):421–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ReWalk Personal 6.0,” 2018. [Online]. Available from: http://rewalk.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekara M, Gopura R, Jayawardena S. 6-REXOS: upper limb exoskeleton robot with improved pHRI. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2015;12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.5772/60440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez JA, Ng P, Lu S, et al. Design of wrist gimbal: a forearm and wrist exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013;13:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650459.
   Google Scholar
• Ball SJ, Brown IE, Scott SH. MEDARM: A rehabilitation robot with 5DOF at the shoulder complex. 2007 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics; IEEE; 2007. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nef T, Mihelj M, Colombo G, et al. ARMin-robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities. Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006; 2006. p. 3152–3157.
   Google Scholar
• Kiguchi K, Hayashi Y. An EMG-based control for an upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton robot. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern, Part B Cybern. 2012;42(4):1064–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo HS, Xie SSQ. An upper limb exoskeleton with an optimized 4R spherical wrist mechanism for the shoulder joint. 2014 IEEE/ASME international conference on Advanced intelligent mechatronics; 2014. p. 269–274,
   Google Scholar
• Beigzadeh B, Ilami M, Najafian S. Design and development of one degree of freedom upper limb exoskeleton. 2015 3rd RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICROM); 2015. p. 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavian M, Toudeshki AG, Yousefi-Koma A. Design and fabrication of a 3DoF upper limb exoskeleton. 2015 3rd RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICROM); 2015. p. 342–346.
   Google Scholar
• Hong MB, Kim SJ, Kim K. Development of a 10-DOF robotic system for upper-limb power assistance. 2012 9th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI); 2012. p. 61–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K. Development of an exoskeleton robot for human wrist and forearm motion assist. 2007 international conference on industrial and information systems; IEEE, 2007, p. 535–540.
   Google Scholar
• Noda T, Teramae T, Ugurlu B, et al. Development of an upper limb exoskeleton powered via pneumatic electric hybrid actuators with bowden cable. 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2014. p. 3573–3578.
   Google Scholar
• Lo HS, Xie SQ. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(3):261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Chen W, Tomizuka M. Kinematic design and analysis of a 6-DOF upper limb exoskeleton model for a brain-machine interface study. Proc 6th IFAC Symp Mechatronic Syst. 2013;46(5):293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa Y, Kikai T, Eguchi K, et al. Exoskeletal meal assistance system (EMAS III) for progressive muscle dystrophy patient. 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics; 2014. p. 279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, O’Malley MK. Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2006;11(3):280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiguchi K, Iwami K, Yasuda M, et al. An Exoskeletal robot for human shoulder joint. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2003;8(1):125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Yi Y. SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2009. pp. 1126–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Frisoli A, Salsedo F, Bergamasco M, et al. A force-feedback exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation in virtual reality. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2009;6(2):115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rocon E, Belda-Lois JM, Ruiz AF, et al. Design and validation of a rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(1):367–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GR, Carus DA, Parrini G, et al. The design of a five degree of freedom powered orthosis for the upper limb. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med. 1989;215:275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki D, Noritsugu T, Takaiwa M. Development of active support splint driven by pneumatic soft actuator (ASSIST). Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2005;2005(April):520–525.
   Google Scholar
• Klein J, Spencer SJ, Allington J, et al. Biomimetic orthosis for the neurorehabilitation of the elbow and shoulder (BONES). 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics; 2008. pp. 535–541.
   Google Scholar
• Sugar TG, He J, Koeneman EJ, et al. Design and control of RUPERT: A device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(1):336–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry M, Mohajerian P, Schaal S. An exoskeleton robot for human arm movement study. 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2005. pp. 3114–3119.
   Google Scholar
• Schiele A, Hirzinger G. A new generation of ergonomic exoskeletons - The high-performance X-Arm-2 for space robotics telepresence. IEEE Int Conf Intell Robot Syst. 2011: 2158–2165.
   Google Scholar
• Schill O, Wiegand R, Schmitz B, et al. Orthojacket: An active FES-hybrid orthosis for the paralysed upper extremity. Biomed Eng. 2011;56(1):35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Qin L, Yuan X, et al. Bionic control of exoskeleton robot based on motion intention for rehabilitation training. Adv Robot. 2019;33(12):590–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejasz Pawełand Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, et al. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar Noury G, Bradwell H, Thill S, et al. User-defined challenges and desiderata for robotics and autonomous systems in health and social care settings. Adv Robot. 2019;33(7–8):309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsotti M, Leonardis D, Loconsole C, et al. A full upper limb robotic exoskeleton for reaching and grasping rehabilitation triggered by MI-BCI. 2015 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR); 2015. pp. 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris DP, Sawicki GS, Daley MA. A physiologist’s perspective on robotic exoskeletons for human locomotion. Int J Humanoid Rob. 2007;4(3):507–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandilakis C, Sasso-lance E. Exoskeletons for personal use after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Quental C, Folgado J, Ambrósio J. A multibody biomechanical model of the upper limb including the shoulder girdle. Multibody Syst Dyn Vol. 28Springer; 2012. p. 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Yi Y. SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2009. p. 1126–1131,
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi A, Kwon Y, Mcdaid AJ, et al. A learning scheme for EMG based Decoding of Dexterous, In-hand Manipulation motions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(10):2205–2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Mondal A, Gupta M. Kinematic, Dynamic analysis and control of 3 DOF upper-limb robotic exoskeleton. J. Eur. en des Systèmes Autom. 2019;52(3):297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Verma V, Chowdary V, Gupta MK, et al. Iot and robotics in healthcare. In: Ella Hassanien Aboul, Dey Nilanjan, Borra Surekha, editors. Medical big data and internet of medical things, CRC Press; 2018. p. 245–269.
   Google Scholar