Mediated hugs modulate impressions of Hearsay information

References

• Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T. Android as a telecommunication medium with a human-like presence. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 2007; Washington DC, USA. p. 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Nakanishi H, Ishiguro H. Physical embodiment can produce robot operator's pseudo presence. Front ICT. 2015;2(8):27.
   Google Scholar
• Haans A, IJsselsteijn W. Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Real. 2006;9(2–3):149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman G. Social touch technology: a survey of haptic technology for social touch. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017;10(3):391–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallace A, Spence C. The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34(2):246–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Erp JB, Toet A. Social touch in human–computer interaction. Front Dig Humanit. 2015;2:2.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone F, Wessberg J, Olausson H. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron. 2014;82(4):737–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvilehto JT, Glerean E, Dunbar RI, et al. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(45):13811–13816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JD, Rytting M, Heslin R. Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry. 1976;39:416–421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson ML, Powell JL, Lenihan MG. Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. J Nonverbal Behav. 1986;10(1):41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK. Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. J Nonverbal Behav. 1991;15(4):233–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Walther JB, Baesler EJ. Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Hum Commun Res. 1992;19(2):237–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik J. Tactile stimulation and consumer response. J Consum Res. 1992;19(3):449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crusco AH, Wetzel CG. The midas touch the effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1984;10(4):512–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman M, Fordyce J. Prosocial behavior as affected by eye contact, touch, and voice expression. J Soc Psychol. 1983;121(1):125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsell S, Goldman M. The effect of touching different body areas on prosocial behavior. J Soc Psychol. 1984;122(2):269–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson JN, Yee N, Brave S, et al. Virtual interpersonal touch: expressing and recognizing emotions through haptic devices. Human–Comput Interact. 2007;22(3):325–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabibihan JJ, Zheng L, Cher CKT. Affective tele-touch. International Conference on Social Robotics; 2012; Chengdu, China. p. 348–356.
   Google Scholar
• Haans A, de Bruijn R, IJsselsteijn WA. A virtual midas touch? Touch, compliance, and confederate bias in mediated communication. J Nonverbal Behav. 2014;38(3):301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman G, Frederiks AD, van Erp JB. Simulating affective touch: using a vibrotactile array to generate pleasant stroking sensations. International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications; 2016; London, United Kingdom. p. 240–250.
   Google Scholar
• Erk SM, Toet A, Van Erp JB. Effects of mediated social touch on affective experiences and trust. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi H, Tanaka K, Wada Y. Remote handshaking: touch enhances video-mediated social telepresence. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2014; Toronto, Canada. p. 2143–2152.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa K, Nishio S, Koda K, et al. Exploring the natural reaction of young and aged person with telenoid in a real world. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform. 2011;15(5):592–597.
   Google Scholar
• Morris D. Manwatching: a field guide to human behavior. New York: Abrams; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hall ET, Birdwhistell RL, Bock B, et al. Proxemics [and comments and replies]. Curr Anthropol. 1968;9(2–3):83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Forsell LM, Åström JA. Meanings of hugging: from greeting behavior to touching implications. Compr Psychol. 2012;1:2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin T. My experiences as an autistic child and review of selected literature. J Orthomol Psychiatry. 1984;13(3):144–174.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson SM, Edelson MG, Kerr DC, et al. Behavioral and physiological effects of deep pressure on children with autism: a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of grandins' hug machine. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(2):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo C, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J. The hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2003; Millbrae, USA. p. 403–408.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller F, Vetere F, Gibbs MR. Hug over a distance. ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2005; Portland, USA. p. 1673–1676.
   Google Scholar
• Teh JK, Tsai Z, Koh JT. Mobile implementation and user evaluation of the huggy pajama system. IEEE International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; 2012; Vancouver, Canada. p. 471–478.
   Google Scholar
• Morikawa O, Hashimoto S, Munakata T. Embrace system for remote counseling. ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces; 2006; Banff, Canada. p. 318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Sumioka H, Nakae A, Kanai R, et al. Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels. Sci Rep. 2013;3: 3034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwamura K, Sakai K, Minato T. Hugvie: a medium that fosters love. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2013; Gyeongju, Korea. p. 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Nakanishi J, Kuwamura K, Minato T. Evoking affection for a communication partner by a robotic communication medium. International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction; 2013; Sapporo, Japan. p. III–1–III–4.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Ban M, Osawa H, et al. Huggable communication medium maintains level of trust during conversation game. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Rholes WS. Saying is believing: effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1978;14(4):363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ET. Saying is believing effects: when sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations. Shared cognition in organizations: the management of knowledge. Vol. 1. L. Erlbaum; Mahwah. 1999. p. 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Echterhoff G, Higgins ET, Groll S. Audience-tuning effects on memory: the role of shared reality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(3):257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse CJ, Toet A, van Erp JB. Affective and behavioral responses to robot-initiated social touch: toward understanding the opportunities and limitations of physical contact in human–robot interaction. Front ICT. 2017;4:12.
   Google Scholar
• Willemse CJ, van Erp JB. Social touch in human–robot interaction: robot-initiated touches can induce positive responses without extensive prior bonding. Int J Soc Robot. 2019;11(2):285–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiehl WD, Lieberman J, Breazeal C. Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2005; Nashville, USA. p. 408–415.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Vol. 104. National Acad Sciences; 2007. p. 17954–17958. (Proceedings of the national academy of sciences).
   Google Scholar
• Shiomi M, Nakata A, Kanbara M. A robot that encourages self-disclosure by hug. International Conference on Social Robotics; 2017; Tsukuba, Japan. p. 324–333.
   Google Scholar
• Block AE, Kuchenbecker KJ. Softness, warmth, and responsiveness improve robot hugs. Int J Soc Robot. 2019;11(1):49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumioka H, Nishio S, Minato T, et al. Minimal human design approach for sonzai-kan media: investigation of a feeling of human presence. Cognit Comput. 2014;6(4):760–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch SE. Forming impressions of personality. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1946;41(3):258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman JM, Nocera CC, Bargh JA. Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science. 2010;328(5986):1712–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir N, Beard C, Bower E. Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognit Ther Res. 2005;29(4):433–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcher SJ, Fisher JD. Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37(1):87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer M. A bounty of science. Sci Am. 2004;290(2):33–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ditzen B, Neumann ID, Bodenmann G, et al. Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(5):565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman R, Singer M, Zagoory O. Touch attenuates infants' physiological reactivity to stress. Dev Sci. 2010;13(2):271–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morhenn V, Beavin LE, Zak PJ. Massage increases oxytocin and reduces adrenocorticotropin hormone in  humans. Altern Ther Health Med. 2012;18(6):11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale JD. Negative thinking in depression: cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship? Adv Behavi Res Ther. 1983;5(1):3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar