Compliance, mass distribution and contact forces in cursorial and scansorial locomotion with biorobotic physical models

References

• Trimmer B. Soft robots. Curr Biol. 2013;23(15):R639–R641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida F, Laschi C. Soft robotics: challenges and perspectives. Procedia Comput Sci. 2011;7:99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Yang GZ, Bellingham J, Dupont PE, et al. The grand challenges of science robotics. Sci Robot. 2018;3(14):eaar7650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertson MD, McDonald G, Korinek G, et al. Serially actuated locomotion for soft robots in tube-like environments. IEEE Robot Automat Lett. 2017;2(2):1140–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney N, Bongard J, Lipson H. Evolving soft robots in tight spaces. Proceedings of the annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation; ACM; 2015. p. 935–942.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee H, Pusalkar N, Ren H. Single-motor controlled tendon-driven peristaltic soft origami robot. J Mech Robot. 2018;10(6):064501.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson H. Challenges and opportunities for design, simulation, and fabrication of soft robots. Soft Robotics. 2014;1(1):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus D, Tolley MT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature. 2015;521(7553):467–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirody JA, Jinn J, Libby T, et al. Geckos race across the water's surface using multiple mechanisms. Curr Biol. 2018;28(24):4046–4051.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusufi A, Kawano DT, Libby T, et al. Righting and turning in mid-air using appendage inertia: reptile tails, analytical models and bio-inspired robots. Bioinspir Biomim. 2010;5(4):045001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby T, Moore TY, Chang-Siu E, et al. Tail-assisted pitch control in lizards, robots and dinosaurs. Nature. 2012;481(7380):181–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Asbeck AT, Cutkosky MR, et al. Spinybotii: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines. Proceedings of 12th international conference on advanced robotics (ICAR); IEEE; 2005. p. 601–606.
   Google Scholar
• Asbeck AT, Kim S, McClung A, et al. Climbing walls with microspines. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference robotics and automation (ICRA); IEEE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Martone M, Pavlov C, Zeloof A, et al. Enhancing the vertical mobility of a robot hexapod using microspines. 2019. arXiv:190604811.
   Google Scholar
• Manoonpong P, Petersen D, Kovalev A, et al. Enhanced locomotion efficiency of a bio-inspired walking robot using contact surfaces with frictional anisotropy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Sun S, Wu X, et al. A wheeled wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine mechanisms. J Bionic Eng. 2015;12(1):17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick WR, Cutkosky MR, Lentink D. Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion. Interface Focus. 2017;7(1):20160094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HN, Siddall R, Stephens B, et al. A passively adaptive microspine grapple for robust, controllable perching. Proceedings of 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft); IEEE; 2019. p. 80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Souri H, Banerjee H, Jusufi A, et al. Wearable and stretchable strain sensors: materials, sensing mechanisms, and applications. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2:2000039.
   Google Scholar
• Boxerbaum AS, Oro J, Peterson G, et al. The latest generation whegsTMrobot features a passive-compliant body joint. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS); IEEE; 2008. p. 1636–1641.
   Google Scholar
• Jusufi A, Goldman DI, Revzen S, et al. Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(11):4215–4219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddall R, Schwab F, Michel J, et al. Heads or tails? cranio-caudal mass distribution for robust locomotion with biorobotic appendages composed of 3d-printed soft materials. Proceedings of conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems; Springer; 2019. p. 240–253.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AM, Lowe J, Roskilly K, et al. Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs. Nature. 2013;498(7453):185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Braae M. Rapid turning at high-speed: Inspirations from the cheetah's tail. 2013 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS); IEEE; 2013. p. 5506–5511.
   Google Scholar
• Patel A, Braae M. An actuated tail increases rapid acceleration manoeuvres in quadruped robots. Innovations and advances in computing, informatics, systems sciences, networking and engineering; Springer; 2015. p. 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson AM, Libby T, Chang-Siu E, et al. Tail assisted dynamic self righting. Adaptive mobile robotics. World Scientific; 2012. p. 611–620.
   Google Scholar
• Libby T, Johnson AM, Chang-Siu E, et al. Comparative design, scaling, and control of appendages for inertial reorientation. IEEE Trans Robot. 2016;32(6):1380–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut N, Haldane D, Zarrouk D, et al. Effect of inertial tail on yaw rate of 45 gram legged robot. International conference on climbing and walking robots and the support technologies for mobile machines; 2012. p. 157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima T, Nishikawa S, Kuniyoshi Y. Active bending motion of pole vault robot to improve reachable height. 2014 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA); IEEE; 2014. p. 4208–4214.
   Google Scholar
• Basu C, Wilson AM, Hutchinson JR. The locomotor kinematics and ground reaction forces of walking giraffes. J Experi Biol. 2019;222(2):jeb159277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TJ, Taylor CR. Energetic cost of locomotion in kangaroos. Nature. 1973;246(5431):313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kram R, Dawson TJ. Energetics and biomechanics of locomotion by red kangaroos (macropus rufus). Comparative Biochem Physiol Part B: Biochem Mol Biol. 1998;120(1):41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman J, Seipel J. Energy efficiency of legged robot locomotion with elastically suspended loads. IEEE Trans Robot. 2013;29(2):321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve M. Simscape multibody contact forces library. 2020. retrieved September 27, 2019. Available From: https://github.com/mathworks/Simscape-Multibody-Contact-Forces-Library/releases/tag/20.1.5.1.
   Google Scholar
• Spenko MJ, Haynes GC, Saunders J, et al. Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot. J Field Robot. 2008;25(4-5):223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagna JC, Goldman DI, Lin PC, et al. Distributed mechanical feedback in arthropods and robots simplifies control of rapid running on challenging terrain. Bioinspir Biomim. 2007;2(1):9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM, et al. Deeplabcut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(9):1281–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf Z, Jusufi A, Vogt D, et al. Fish-like aquatic propulsion studied using a pneumatically-actuated soft-robotic model. Bioinspir Biomim. 2020;15(4):046008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright B, Vogt DM, Wood RJ, et al. Soft sensors for curvature estimation under water in a soft robotic fish. Proceedings of 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft); 2019. p. 367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Jusufi A, Vogt DM, Wood RJ, et al. Undulatory swimming performance and body stiffness modulation in a soft robotic fish-inspired physical model. Soft Robot. 2017;4(3):202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Siddall R, Schwab F, et al. Modeling and control of a soft robotic fishtail with integrated soft sensing. Adv Intell Syst. 2021. In press. doi:10.1002/aisy.202000244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar