Development of a novel motion capture and gait analysis system for rat locomotion

References

• Bickenbach J, Officer A, World Health Organization, International Spinal Cord Society. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. World Health Organization; 2013. p. 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nooijen CFJ, Hoeve NT, Field-Fote EC. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in individuals with SCI regardless of training approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6(1):36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz GAS, Merkler D, Dietz V, et al. Efficient testing of motor function in spinal cord injured rats. Brain Res. 2000;883(2):165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WL, Jindrich DL, Roy RR, et al. Quantitative metrics of spinal cord injury recovery in the rat using motion capture, electromyography and ground reaction force measurement. J Neurosci Methods. 2012;206(1):65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans GC, Deumens R, Honig WM, et al. The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination.J Neurotrauma. 2005;22(2):214–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto PA, Filipe VM, Magalhães LG, et al. A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques for the determination of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats following spinal cord injury.J Neurosci Methods. 2008;173(2):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballermann M, Tse AD, Misiaszek JE. Adaptations in the walking pattern of spinal cord injured rats. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23(6):897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Almström S, Giménez-Llort L, et al. Gait analysis of adult paraplegic rats after spinal cord repair. Exp Neurol. 1997;148(2):544–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhimani AD, Kheirkhah P, Arnone GD, et al. Functional gait analysis in a spinal contusion rat model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;83:540–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamers FPT, Lankhorst AJ, van Laar TJ, et al. Automated quantitative gait analysis during overground locomotion in the rat: its application to spinal cord contusion and transection injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18(2):187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo JH, Nixon MS. Automated markerless analysis of human gait motion for recognition and classification. Etri J. 2011;33(2):259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene BR, McGrath D, O'Neill R, et al. An adaptive gyroscope-based algorithm for temporal gait analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48(12):1251–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong K, Granat MH. A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. Med Eng Phys. 1999;21(2):87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrizi A, Pennestrì E, Valentini PP. Comparison between low-cost marker-less and high-end marker-based motion capture systems for the computer-aided assessment of working ergonomics. Ergonomics. 2016;59(1):155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puthenveetil SC, Daphalapurkar CP, Zhu W, et al. Comparison of marker-based and marker-less systems for low-cost human motion capture. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Vol. 55867. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Elhayek A, de Aguiar E, Jain A, et al. Efficient convent-based marker-less motion capture in general scenes with a low number of cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Corazza S, Muendermann L, Chaudhari AM, et al. A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: visual hull and simulated annealing approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(6):1019–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza S, Mündermann L, Gambaretto E, et al. Markerless motion capture through visual hull, articulated icp and subject specific model generation. Int J Comput Vis. 2010;87(1–2):156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodin H, Richardt C, Casas D, et al. Egocap: egocentric marker-less motion capture with two fisheye cameras. ACM Trans Graph (TOG). 2016;35(6):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tome D, Toso M, Agapito L, et al. Rethinking pose in 3d: multi-stage refinement and recovery for markerless motion capture. In 2018 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). IEEE; 2018. p. 474–483.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin B, Rozantsev A, Lepetit V, et al. Direct prediction of 3d body poses from motion compensated sequences. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016. p. 991–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Mirbozorgi SA, Ghovanloo M. Towards a kinect-based behavior recognition and analysis system for small animals. In 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS). IEEE; 2015. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan PJ, Howard J, Cootes TF, et al. Realtime markerless rigid body head motion tracking using the Microsoft Kinect. In 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC). IEEE; 2012. p. 2241–2246.
   Google Scholar
• Ceseracciu E, Sawacha Z, Cobelli C. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: proof of concept. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e87640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winiarski S. Human locomotion analysis technique with SIMI motion. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2003;5(1):544–50.
   Google Scholar
• Karakostas T, Hsiang S, Boger H, et al. Three-dimensional rodent motion analysis and neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;231:31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle JH, López AC, Patel YA, et al. Open ephys: an open-source, plugin-based platform for multichannel electrophysiology. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(4):045003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn PJ, Jain AK. BONSAI: 3D object recognition using constrained search. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1991;13(10):1066–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winiarski S. Human locomotion analysis technique with SIMI motion. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2003;5(1):544–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, et al. Ssd: single shot multibox detector. In European conference on computer vision. Cham: Springer; 2016; p. 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Redmon J, Farhadi A. Yolov3: an incremental improvement. 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu SC, Huang JY, Kao WC, et al. Human body motion parameters capturing using kinect. Mach Vis Appl. 2015;26(7–8):919–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior CFC, Pederiva CN, Bose RC, et al. ETHOWATCHER: validation of a tool for behavioral and video-tracking analysis in laboratory animals. Comput Biol Med. 2012;42(2):257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL. Digital image processing using Matlab. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshelham K, Elberink SO. Accuracy and resolution of kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors. 2012;12(2):1437–1454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden F, Winkler D. Bayesian regularization of neural networks. In Artificial neural networks. Humana Press; 2008. p. 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Weichert F, Bachmann D, Rudak B, et al. Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors. 2013;13(5):6380–6393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt DJ, Clifford J. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In KDD Workshop. Vol. 10. no. 16. 1994. p. 359–370.
   Google Scholar