Motion sensor-based haptic master controller with finger band soft actuator for surgical robots

References

• Taylor RH. A perspective on medical robotics. Proc IEEE. 2006;94(9):1652–1664. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.880669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannaford B, Rosen J, Friedman DW, et al. Raven-ii: an open platform for surgical robotics research. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;60(4):954–959. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2228858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Pan B, Fu Y, et al. Design of a new haptic device and experiments in minimally invasive surgical robot. Comput Aided Surg. 2017;22(sup1):240–250.
   Google Scholar
• Field M, Stirling D, Naghdy F, et al. Motion capture in robotics review. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation; IEEE; 2009. p. 1697–1702.
   Google Scholar
• Goradia I, Doshi J, Kurup L. A review paper on oculus rift & project morpheus. Int J Current Eng Technol. 2014;4(5):3196–3200.
   Google Scholar
• Cerulo I., Ficuciello F., Lippiello V., et al. Teleoperation of the schunk s5fh under-actuated anthropomorphic hand using human hand motion tracking. Robot Auton Syst. 2017;89:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guna J, Jakus G, Pogačnik M, et al. An analysis of the precision and reliability of the leap motion sensor and its suitability for static and dynamic tracking. Sensors. 2014;14(2):3702–3720. doi: 10.3390/s140203702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisanuvej P, Giataganas P, Riordan P, et al. Affordable mobile-based simulator for robotic surgery. preprint, 2018. arXiv:180708057.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhou N, Wang S. Direct manipulation of tool-like masters for controlling a master–slave surgical robotic system. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2014;10(4):427–437. doi: 10.1002/rcs.v10.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennib H, Bastawisy A, Mack MJ, et al. Computer-assisted telemanipulation: an enabling technology for endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(3):1060–1063. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00659-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura AM. Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Ind Robot: Int J. 2004;31(6):499–508. doi: 10.1108/01439910410566362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, et al. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(1):151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giabbiconi CM, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Gruber T, et al. Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage. 2007;35(1):255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Ben-Tzvi P. Design and optimization of a five-finger haptic glove mechanism. J Mech Robot. 2015;7(4): 041008. doi: 10.1115/1.4029437
   Google Scholar
• Kato F, Inoue Y, Tachi S. Haptic display glove capable of force/vibration/temperature. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics (ISMCR); IEEE; 2019. p. D2–2.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang Q, Wu J, Sun S, et al. Bio-inspired haptic feedback for artificial palpation in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(10):3184–3193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talhan A, Kim H, Jeon S. Tactile ring: multi-mode finger-worn soft actuator for rich haptic feedback. IEEE Access. 2019;8:957–966. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minamizawa K, Fukamachi S, Kajimoto H, et al. The sigma.7 haptic interface for MiroSurge: A new bi-manual surgical consoleACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Emerging Technologies. SIGGRAPH '07. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2007. p. 3023–3030.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Fukui Y. Development of fingertip type non-grounding force feedback display. In: Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07); IEEE; 2007. p. 582–583.
   Google Scholar
• Tsetserukou D, Hosokawa S, Terashima K. Linktouch: a wearable haptic device with five-bar linkage mechanism for presentation of two-dof force feedback at the fingerpad. In: 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS); IEEE; 2014. p. 307–312.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Colan J, Aoyama T, et al. Cutaneous feedback interface for teleoperated in-hand manipulation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); IEEE; 2022. p. 605–611.
   Google Scholar
• Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D, Kuchenbecker KJ. Cutaneous feedback of fingertip deformation and vibration for palpation in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;63(2):278–287. doi: 10.1109/TBME.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr SB, Okamura AM. Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '17. NewYork, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 3115–3119.
   Google Scholar
• Tadano K, Kawashima K, Kojima K, et al. Development of a pneumatic surgical manipulator ibis iv. J Robot Mechatron. 2010;22(2):179–188. doi: 10.20965/jrm.2010.p0179
   Google Scholar
• Tobergte A, Helmer P, Hagn U, et al. The sigma.7 haptic interface for MiroSurge: A new bi-manual surgical console. 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2011. p. 3023–3030.
   Google Scholar