Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength using different cementing agents in molar and premolar attachments

References

• Finnema KJ, Özcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:615–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millett DT, Mandall NA, Mattick RCR, Hickman J. Glenny A-M. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011;6:CD008236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banks P, Macfarlane TV. Bonded versus banded first molar attachments: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Orthod. 2007;34:128–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viwattanatipa N, Prasertsangwal J, Juntavee N. Weibull analysis of shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes bonded to five resin composites. Orthod. Waves. 2008;67:100–127.
   Google Scholar
• Newman GV. Epoxy adhesive for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am. J. Orthod. 1965;51:901–912.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishara SE, Gordon VV, Von Wald L, Olsen M. Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:243–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal T, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Sar Z, Buyukerkmen A. Can previously bleached teeth be bonded safely? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:628–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, García-Godoy F, Park MG, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent. Mater. J. 2009;28:730–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaladejo A, Montero J, Gomez de Diego F, López-Valverde A. Effect of adhesive application prior to bracket bonding with flowable composites. Angle. Orthod. 2011;81:716–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercelino C, Pinzan A, Gurgel JA, Bramante FS, Pinzan LM. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct bonding of orthodontic molar tubes. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2011;16:60.e1–60.e8.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato M, Montero J, Ceballos L, Oyagüe R, Fuentes V, Sánchez JM, Albaladejo A. Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength of flowable composite resins and APC plus to orthodontic molar tubes. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2012;27:811–819.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato M, Montero J, Fuentes V, Albaladejo A. Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength of refrigerated and pre-heated of different composite resins to orthodontic molar tubes. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2013;1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente A, Bravo LA. Evaluation of different flowable materials for bonding brackets. Am. J. Dent. 2009;22:111–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras AH. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:525–534.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan PM, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Attilio M, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:410–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tecco S, Traini T, Caputi S, Festa F, de Luca V, D’Attilio M. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:672–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:1105–1109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA, Zanella E. Effect of a self-etching primer on shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets in vivo. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:127–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan JV, James D, Soo PP, Tzou S. The APC plus adhesive coated appliance system: features and technical review. Orthod. Perspect. 2004;11:5–9.
   Google Scholar
• White LW. Glass ionomer cement. J. Clin. Orthod. 1986;20:387–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook PA. Direct bonding with glass ionomer cement. J. Clin. Orthod. 1990;24:509–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsten L. Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Scand J. Dent. Res. 1977;85:503–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trimpeneers LM, Verbeeck RMH, Dermaut LR, Moors MG. Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. Eur. J. Orthod. 1996;18:89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Romeo A, Higuera B, Garcı’a-Godoy F. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin modified glass. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;69:58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pretreatment. Am. J. Orthod. 1984;85:333–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox N, McCabe J, Buckley J. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br. J. Orthod. 1994;21:33–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Lopes M, Perdigão J, Ambrose WW, Rosa BT. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dent. Mater. 2002;18:227–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. In vitro study of 24-h and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:620–624.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talpur M, Cunningham S, Moles D, Jones S. The relationship between base dimensions, force to failure, and shear bond strengths of bondable molar tubes. Angle Orthod. 2012;3:536–540.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger GL. Utilizing the smartclip self-ligating appliance. In: 3M Unitek, editor. Orthodontic perspectives: the system approach. Vol. 23. Monrovia, CA: 3M Unitek Publication; 2005. p. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Finnema K, Ybema A. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. Eur. J. Orthod. 2008;30:176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:284–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenzo MC, Portillo M, Moreno P, Montero J, Castillo-Oyagüe R, García A, Albaladejo A. In vitro analysis of femtosecond laser as an alternative to acid etching for achieving suitable bond strength of brackets to human enamel. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013. doi:10.1007/510103-013-1278-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br. J. Orthod. 1975;2:171–178.
   Google Scholar