Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations

References

• Karaarslan ES, Usumez A, Ozturk B, Cebe MA. Effect of cavity preparation techniques and different preheating procedures on microleakage of class V resin restorations. Eur. J. Dent. 2012;6:87–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:608–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am. J. Dent. 1998;11:281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, May KN Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper. Dent. 2000;25:186–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2000;118:517–524.
   Google Scholar
• Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J. Dent. 2012;40:475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusgoz A, Ülker M, Yesilyurt C, Yoldas OH, Ozil M, Tanriver M. Silorane-based composite: depth of cure, surface hardness, degree of conversion, and cervical microleakage in class II cavities. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2011;23:324–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2007;19:340–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J. Dent. 1992;20:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Scmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98–FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007;9:121–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012;16:191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide class II MOD cavities. Oper. Dent. 2009;34:578–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am. J. Dent. 2003;16:414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper. Dent. 2005;30:492–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2013;25:55–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent. Mater. 2010;26:1176–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am. J. Dent. 2001;14:163–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am. J. Dent. 2000;13:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper. Dent. 2001;26:253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:135–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999;82:209–213.
   Google Scholar
• Coli P, Brannstrom M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:583–591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bala O, Uctasli MB, Unlu I. The leakage of class II cavities restored with packable resin-based composites. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2003;4:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J. Dent. 2001;29:55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Kirkevang LL, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Poulsen S. Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2011;15:291–295.
   Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. Dent. Mater. J. 2006;25:445–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low-shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent. Mater. J. 2007;26:149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar