The effect of different restoration techniques on fracture strength of teeth with flared roots

References

• Ferrari M, Breschi L, Grandini S, editors. Fiber posts and endodontically treated teeth: a compendium of scientific and clinical perspectives. 1st ed. Gauteng: Modern Dentistry Media Wendy Wood; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast metal post and cores. Am. J. Dent. 2000;13:15B–18B.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galhano GA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber- based posts. J. Endod. 2005;31:209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Robbıns JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J. Endod. 2004;30:289–301.10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borrachini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J. Adhes. Dent. 2005;7:235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RR, Boaro LC, Kuroe T, Azevedo CL, Singer JM. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and ‘C’ factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Dent. Mater. 2006;22:818–823.10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel SS. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with a polyethylene ribbond and prefabricated fiberglass post. Gen. Dent. 2000;48:700–706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchi GM, Pulillo LA, Pimenta LA, De Lima FA. Effect of different filling materials in combination with intraradicular posts on the resistance to fracture of weakened roots. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:623–629.
   Google Scholar
• Boudrias P, Sakkal S, Petrova Y. Anatomical post design meets quartz fiber technology: rationale and case report. Compend. Cont. Educ. Dent. 2001;22:337–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J. Adhes. Dent. 2003;5:243–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savi A, Manfredi M, Tamani M, Fazzi M, Pizzi S. Use of customized fiber posts for the aesthetic treatment of severely compromised teeth: a case report. Dent. Traumatol. 2008;24:671–675.10.1111/edt.2008.24.issue-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moosavi H, Maleknejad F, Kimyavi S. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2008;9:30–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kivanç BH, Alaçam T, Ulusoy OI, Genç O, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. Int. Endod. J. 2009;42:997–1003.10.1111/iej.2009.42.issue-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukui Y, Komada W, Yoshida K, Otake S, Okada D, Mıura H. Effect of reinforcement with resin composite on fracture strength of structurally compromised roots. Dent. Mater. J. 2009;28:602–609.10.4012/dmj.28.602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using ligt-transmitting plastic posts. Quintescence Int. 1994;25:313–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clavijo VG, Reis JM, Kabbach W, Silva AL, Oliveira Junior OB, Andrade MF. Fracture strength of flared bovine roots restored with different intraradicular posts. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2009;17:574–578.10.1590/S1678-77572009000600007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagase DY, Takemoto S, Hattori M, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. Influence of fabrication techniques on retention force of fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent. Mater. J. 2005;24:280–285.10.4012/dmj.24.280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz. Oral Res. 2005;19:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca RB, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007;98:277–284.10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60101-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J. Adhes. Dent. 2008;10:251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:963–971.10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites – a comparative study. Dent. Mater. 2006;22:934–941.10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J. Dent. Res. 2000;79:818–823.10.1177/00220345000790030601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? J. Endod. 2008;34:1006–1010.10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Raposo LH, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Menezes MS, Soares PB, Magalhães D. Effect of different cements on the biomechanical behavior of teeth restored with cast dowel-and-cores-in vitro and FEA analysis. J. Prosthodont. 2010;19:130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J. Endod. 1989;15:512–516.10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori M, Takemoto S, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y. Durability of fiber-post and resin core build-up systems. Dent. Mater. J. 2010;29:224–228.10.4012/dmj.2009-113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maceri F, Martignoni M, Vairo G. Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: a finite-element approach. J. Biomech. 2007;40:2386–2398.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogheib LV, Pereira JR, do Valle AL, de Oliveira JA, Pegoraro F. Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with composite resin and glass fiber post. Braz. Dent. J. 2008;19:329–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchi GM, Mitsui FH, Cavalcanti AN. Effect of remaining dentine structure and thermal-mechanical aging on the fracture resistance of bovine roots with different post and core systems. Int. Endod. J. 2008;41:969–976.10.1111/iej.2008.41.issue-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva GR, Santos-Filho PC, Simamoto-Júnior PC, Martins LR, Mota AS, Soares CJ. Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots. Braz. Dent. J. 2011;22:230–237.10.1590/S0103-64402011000300009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004;17:369–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann M, Metzdorf G, Fokkinga W, Watzke R, Sterzenbach G, Bayne S, Rosentritt M. Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured review. J. Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:299–312.10.1111/jor.2009.36.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen NN. Stress-strain response in human dentine: rethinking fracture predilection in postcore restored teeth. Dent. Traumatol. 2004;20:90–100.10.1111/edt.2004.20.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Guindy J, Fouda MY. Effect of obturating systems, dowel materials, and adhesive luting techniques on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. J. Prosthodont. 2010;19:544–552.10.1111/jopr.2010.19.issue-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorrentino R, Zarone F. Mechanical resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. In: Ferrai M, Breschi L, Grandini S, editors. Fiber posts and enodontically treated teeth: a compendium of scientific and clinical perspectives. 1st ed. Modern Dentistry Media: Wendy Wood; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J. Dent. 1997;25:435–440.
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, Dauvillier BS. Effect of TEGDMA/BisGMA ratio on stress development and viscoelastic properties of experimental two-paste composites. J. Dent. Res. 2003;82:824–828.10.1177/154405910308201012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Carvalho CA, Goracci C, Antoniolli F, Mazzoni A, Mazzotti G, Cadenaro M, Breschi L. Influence of luting material filler content on post cementation. J. Dent. Res. 2009;88:951–956.10.1177/0022034509342851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Effects of C-factor and resin volume on the bonding to root canal with and without fibre post insertion. J. Dent. 2011;39:422–429.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modelling approach. J. Endod. 2006;31:584–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2000;131:497–503.10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroudi K, Saleh AM, Silikas N, Watts DC. Shrinkage behaviour of flowable resin-composites related to conversion and filler-fraction. J. Dent. 2007;35:651–655.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho E, Chikawa H, Kishikawa R, Inai N, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Influence of elasticity on gap formation in a lining technique with flowable composite. Dent. Mater. J. 2006;25:538–544.10.4012/dmj.25.538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:709–715.10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosentritt M, Naumann M, Hahnel S, Handel G, Reill M. Evaluation of tooth analogs and type of restoration on the fracture resistance of post and core restored incisors. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Part B Appl. Biomater. 2009;91B:272–276.10.1002/jbm.b.v91b:1
   Google Scholar
• Büttel L, Krastl G, Lorch H, Naumann M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R. Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance. Int. Endodon. J. 2009;42:47–53.10.1111/iej.2008.42.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayad MF, Bahannan SA, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of irrigant, dowel type, and root-reinforcing material on fracture resistance of thin-walled endodontically treated teeth. J. Prosthodont. 2011;20:180–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar