Assessment of the sealant/tooth interface using optical coherence tomography

References

• Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–1181.10.1126/science.1957169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger C, Fercher A. Performance of fourier domain vs time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express. 2003;11:889–894.10.1364/OE.11.000889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaechi B, Higham S, Podoleanu A, Rogers JA, Jackson DA. Use of optical coherence tomography for assessment of dental caries: quantitative procedure. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:1092–1093.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00840.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaechi B, Podoleanu A, Higham SM, Jackson DA. Correlation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence and optical coherence tomography applied for detection and quantification of early dental caries. J. Biomed. Opt. 2003;8:642–647.10.1117/1.1606685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko C-T, Choo-Smith L-P, Hewko M, Leonardi L, Sowa MG, Dong CCS, Williams P, Cleghorn B. Ex vivo detection and characterization of early dental caries by optical coherence tomography and Raman spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2005;10:031118.10.1117/1.1915488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong SL, Darling CL, Fried D. Nondestructive measurement of the inhibition of demineralization on smooth surfaces using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Lasers Surg. Med. 2007;39:422–427.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu DP, Sowa MG, Hewko MD, Choo-Smith LP. Assessment of early demineralization in teeth using the signal attenuation in optical coherence tomography images. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008;13:054053.10.1117/1.2992129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RS, Darling CL, Featherstone JDB, Fried D. Remineralization of in vitro dental caries assessed with polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006;11:014016.10.1117/1.2161192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinescu C, Negrutiu ML, Todea C, Balabuc C, Filip L, Rominu R, Bradu A, Hughes M, Podoleanu AGh. Quality assessment of dental treatments using en-face optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Optics. 2008;13:054065.10.1117/1.2992593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder-Smith CH, Wilder-Smith P, Kawakami-Wong H, Voronets J, Osann K, Lussi A. Quantification of dental erosions in patients with GERD using optical coherence tomography before and after double-blind, randomized treatment with esomeprazole or placebo. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2788–2795.10.1038/ajg.2009.441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzman JS, Osann K, Pharar J, Lee K, Ahn Y-C, Tucker T, Sabet S, Chen Z, Gukasyan R, Smith PW. Ability of optical coherence tomography to detect caries beneath commonly used dental sealants. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010;42:752–759.10.1002/lsm.20963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn WG, Gooch BF, Caufield PW. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2008;139:271–278.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braz AKS, Aguiar CM, Gomes ASL. Evaluation of the integrity of dental sealants by optical coherence tomography. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:e60–e64.10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie AM, Stephen KW, Key EJ. Fissure sealants retention: a comparison of sealants types under field conditions. Commun. Dent. Health. 1990;7:273–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper. Dent. 2000;25:274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry AO, Rueggeberg F. The effect of acid primer or conventional acid etching on microleakage in a photoactivated sealant. Pediat. Dent. 2003;25:127–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AFS, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J. Dent. 2006;34:381–388.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro GQM, Montes MAJR, Gomes ASL, Mota CCBO, Campello SL, Freitas AZ. Marginal analysis of resin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:e213–e223.10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-destructive 3D imaging of composite restorations using optical coherence tomography: marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesives. J. Dent. 2011;39:316–325.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldchtein F, Gelikonov V, Iksanov R, Gelikonov G, Kuranov R, Sergeev A, Gladkova N, Ourutina M, Reitze D, Warren J. In vivo OCT imaging of hard and soft tissue of the oral cavity. Opt. Express. 1998;3:239–250.10.1364/OE.3.000239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Marginal adaptation. J. Dent. 1993;21:265–273.10.1016/0300-5712(93)90104-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot EH. Adaptation and radiographic evaluation of four adhesive systems. J. Dent. 1997;25:391–397.10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00048-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Burrow MF, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper. Dent. 1995;20:160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otis L, al-Sadhan RI, Meiers J, Redford-Badwel D. Identification of occlusal sealants using optical coherence tomography. J. Clin. Dent 2003;14:7–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones R, Staninec M, Fried D. Imaging artificial caries under composite sealants and restorations. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004;9:1297–1304.10.1117/1.1805562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duma VF, Lee K, Meemon P, Rolland JP. Experimental investigations of the scanning functions of galvanometer-based scanners with applications in OCT. Appl. Opt. 2011;50:5735–5749.10.1364/AO.50.005735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcauteanu C, Bradu A, Sinescu C, Topala FI, Negrutiu LM, Podoleanu A. Quantitative evaluation of dental abfraction and attrition using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:021108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernat R, Tatla TS, Pang J, Tadrous PJ, Bradu A, Dobre G, Gelikonov G, Gelikonov V, Podoleanu AGh. Dual instrument for in vivo and ex vivo OCT imaging in an ENT department. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2012;3:3346–3356.10.1364/BOE.3.003346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demian D, Duma VF, Sinescu C, Negrutiu ML, Cernat R, Topala FI, Hutiu Gh, Bradu A, Podoleanu A. Design and testing of prototype handheld scanning probes for optical coherence tomography. J. Eng. Med. 2014;228:743–753.10.1177/0954411914543963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K-J, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of interfacial defects at composite restorations by swept source optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18:076018.10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar