The effect of bulk-fill flowable composites on the fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of endodontically treated premolars

References

• Sathorn C, Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH. Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis. J. Endod. 2005;31:288–292.10.1097/01.don.0000140579.17573.f7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Queiroz EC, Araújo TC, Campos RE, Araújo CA, Soares CJ. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J. Prosthodont. 2008;17:114–119.10.1111/jopr.2008.17.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations. J. Dent. 2011;39:527–535.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-López S, De Haro-Gasquet F, Vílchez-Díaz MA, Ceballos L, Bravo M. Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection. Oper. Dent. 2006;31:33–38.10.2341/04-165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de V Habekost L, Camacho GB, Azevedo EC, Demarco FF. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007;98:186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MR, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Lee IB. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent. Mater. 2007;23:288–295.10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J. Dent. 2009;37:724–730.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suliman AA, Boyer DB. Interferometric measurements of cusp deformation of teeth restored with composites. J. Dent. Res. 1993;72:1532–1536.10.1177/00220345930720111201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J. Dent. Res. 1984;63:146–148.10.1177/00220345840630021001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper. Dent. 2001;26:406–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J. Oral Rehabil. 1993;20:495–499.10.1111/jor.1993.20.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J. Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:115–122.10.1111/jor.1992.19.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Light-curing units, polymerization, and clinical implications. J. Adhes. Dent. 2000;2:167–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oskoee SS, Oskoee PA, Navimipour EJ, Shahi S. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars. Oper. Dent. 2007;32:510–514.10.2341/06-149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J. Dent. Res. 1993;72:1434–1442.10.1177/00220345930720101401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations – a 3D finite element analysis. Dent. Mater. 2002;18:295–303.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00042-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming GJ, Awan M, Cooper PR, Sloan AJ. The potential of a resin-composite to be cured to a 4 mm depth. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:522–529.10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J. Dent. 2011;39:643–647.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J. Dent. 2012;40:500–505.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:348–355.10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:269–277.10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman E, Ozgunaltay G. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner. Oper. Dent. 2013;38:282–289.10.2341/11-400-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008;99:30–37.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60006-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohbauer U, von der Horst T, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:435–440.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00088-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994;71:565–567.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeh ES, Messer HH. Long-term paresthesia following inadvertent forcing of sodium hypochlorite through perforation in maxillary incisor. Endod Dent. Traumatol. 1989;5:200–203.10.1111/edt.1989.5.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1980;43:419–422.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90213-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJ. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J. Dent. 1992;20:131–139.10.1016/0300-5712(92)90124-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent. Traumatol. 1990;6:49–55.10.1111/edt.1990.6.issue-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fokkinga WA, Le Bell AM, Kreulen CM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Int. Endod. J. 2005;38:230–237.10.1111/iej.2005.38.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivanç BH, Alaçam T, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of premolars with one remaining cavity wall restored using different techniques. Dent. Mater. J. 2010;29:262–267.10.4012/dmj.2009-061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:543–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodonti-cally-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am. J. Dent. 1997;10:237–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J. Endod. 1992;18:332–335.10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80483-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Int. Endod. J. 2012;45:524–529.10.1111/iej.2012.45.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent. Mater. 1999;15:128–137.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on mi-croleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper. Dent. 2004;29:713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent. Mater. 2013;29:e213–e217.10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1501–1505.10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J. Dent. 2003;31:437–444.10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00121-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim ME, Park SH. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods. Oper. Dent. 2011;36:326–334.10.2341/10-315-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratih DN, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Minimizing dentinal fluid flow associated with gap formation. J. Dent. Res. 2006;85:1027–1031.10.1177/154405910608501110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Nathwani H, Burke FJ, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent. Mater. 2005;21:324–335.10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J. Dent. Res. 1996;75:871–878.10.1177/00220345960750030301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar