Surface topography effect on fibroblasts population on epiclon-based polyimide films

References

• Nagura I, Fujioka H, Kokubu T, Makino T, Sumi Y, Kurosaka M. Repair of osteochondral defects with a new porous synthetic polymer scaffold. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:258–264. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B2.17754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ KV, Turner KT. Methods to measure the strength of cell adhesion to substrates. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:2027–2058. 10.1163/016942410X507911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legeay G, Coudreuse A, Poncin-Epaillard F, Herry JM, Bellon-Fontaine MN. Surface engineering and cell adhesion. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:2301–2322. 10.1163/016942410X508037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seunarine K, Gadegaard N, Tormen M, Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD. 3D polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine. 2006;1:281–296. 10.2217/17435889.1.3.281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Ploux L, Ponche A. Cell/material interfaces: influence of surface chemistry and surface topography on cell adhesion. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:831–852. 10.1163/016942409X12598231568186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carré A, Lacarrière V. How substrate properties control cell adhesion. A physical–chemical approach. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:815–830. 10.1163/016942409X12598231567862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Mocanasu RC, Stoddart PR, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP. Impact of nano-topography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnol. J. 2008;3:536–544. 10.1002/(ISSN)1860-7314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Decuzzi P, Ferrari M. Modulating cellular adhesion through nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2010;31:173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Janshoff A, Lorenz B, Pietuch A, et al. Cell adhesion to ordered pores: consequences for cellular elasticity. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:2287–2300. 10.1163/016942410X508028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzler TP, Huwiler C, Drobek T, Voros J, Spencer ND. Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5000–5006. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3188–3197. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan YW, Cui FZ, Hou SP, Xu QY, Chen LN, Lee IS. Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2002;120:17–23. 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00181-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJH, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:1099–1108. 10.1089/107632702320934191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumoto N, Hiruma H, Nagaoka S, Fujiyama K, Kaneko A, Kawakami H. Cell processing on polyimide surface patterned by rubbing. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008;19:1002–1008. 10.1002/pat.v19:8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomathi N, Mishra D, Maiti TK, Neogi S. Enhanced cell adhesion to helium plasma-treated polypropylene. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2009;23:1861–1874. 10.1163/016942409X12459095670593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasálková N, Makajová Z, Pařízek M, et al. Cell adhesion and proliferation on plasma-treated and poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted polyethylene. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010;24:743–754. 10.1163/016942409X12579497420762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JB, Oh JS, Gil EL, Kyoung SJ, Lim JT, Yeom GY. Polyimide surface treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma for metal adhesion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010;157:D614–D619. 10.1149/1.3493585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Kenny JM. Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010;95:2126–2146. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzic AI, Stoica I, Fifere N, Vlad CD, Hulubei C. Morphological effects on transparency and absorption edges of some semi-alicyclic polyimides. J. Polym. Res. 2013;20:130–137. 10.1007/s10965-013-0130-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens SH, Inventor, American Dental Association Health Foundation, Assignee, Polymerizable conditioners for adhesive bonding to dentin and enamel. United States patent US 6,001,897. 1999 Dec 14.
   Google Scholar
• Hulubei C, Hamciuc E, Bruma M. New polyimides based on epiclon. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2007;52:1063–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioanid GE. Plasma reactors for polymer materials chemical processing. Rom. J. Phys. 2005;50:1071–1079.
   Google Scholar
• Rankl M, Laib S, Seeger S. Surface tension properties of surface-coatings for application in biodiagnostics determined by contact angle measurements. Colloids Surf. B. 2003;30:177–186. 10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00085-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goissis G, Lacerda C, Barbosa MP, Pinatti A. Surface tension control of collagen biomaterials by the selective hydrolysis of internal carboxyamides of the protein matrix. Rev. Bras. Eng. Biomed. 1999;15:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• van Oss CJ. Surface properties of fibrinogen and fibrin. J. Protein Chem. 1990;9:487–491. 10.1007/BF01024625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Oss CJ. Long-range and short-range mechanisms of hydrophobic attraction and hydrophilic repulsion in specific and aspecific interactions. J. Mol. Recognit. 2003;16:177–190. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonda R, Aelenei N, Apostu M-O, Melnig V. Surface tension control of crosslinked drawn collagen films. AL. I. Cuza University Scientific Annals, section Biophysics, Medical Physics and Environment Physics. 2007;III:57–62.
   Google Scholar
• ASME B46.1. Surface texture (surface roughness, waviness, and lay); 2009.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 25178-2. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – surface texture: areal – part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shishkovsky I, Morozov Y, Smurov I. Nanostructural self-organization under selective laser sintering of exothermic powder mixtures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009;255:5565–5568. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.09.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacob M, Bele A, Patras X, et al. Preparation of electromechanically active silicone composites and some evaluations of their suitability for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2014;43:392–402. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt L, Jiang X. Advanced techniques for assessment surface topography. 1st ed. Development of a basis for 3D surface texture standards ‘Surfstand’. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse DJ. Handbook of surface and nanometrology. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2011. 10.1201/b10415
   Google Scholar
• Gentile F, Medda R, Cheng L, et al. Selective modulation of cell response on engineered fractal silicon substrates. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:211–222. 10.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare RS, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 2007;6:997–1003. 10.1038/nmat2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douketis C, Wang Z, Haslett TL, Moskovits M. Fractal character of cold-deposited silver films determined by low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter. 1995;51:11022–11031. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.11022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn W, Zösch A. The dependence of fractal dimension on measuring conditions of scanning probe microscopy. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1999;365:168–172. 10.1007/s002160051466
   Google Scholar
• Dalet P, Papon E, Villenave J-J. Surface free energy of polymeric materials: relevancy of conventional contact angle data analyses. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1999;13:857–870. 10.1163/156856199X00712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovici D, Barzic AI, Stoica I, et al. Plasma modification of surface wettability and morphology for optimization of the interactions involved in blood constituents spreading on some novel copolyimide films. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012;32:781–799. 10.1007/s11090-012-9376-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhusari D, Hayden H, Tanikella R, Allen SAB, Kohl PA. Plasma treatment and surface analysis of polyimide films for electroless copper buildup process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005;152:F162–F170. 10.1149/1.2006587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naddaf M, Balasubramanian C, Alegaonkar PS, et al. Surface interaction of polyimide with oxygen ECR plasma. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B. 2004;222:135–144. 10.1016/j.nimb.2003.12.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki N, Tasaka S, Hibi K. Surface modification of Kapton film by plasma treatments. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 1992;30:1425–1431. 10.1002/pola.1992.080300722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves P, Pinto S, Kaiser JP, Bruinink A, de Sousa HC, Gil MH. Surface grafting of a thermoplastic polyurethane with methacrylic acid by previous plasma surface activation and by ultraviolet irradiation to reduce cell adhesion. Colloids Surf. B. 2011;82:371–377. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK. Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir. 1988;4:884–891. 10.1021/la00082a018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Volpe C, Maniglio D, Brugnara M, Siboni S, Morra M. The solid surface free energy calculation: I. In defense of the multicomponent approach. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;271:434–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton RM, Rasmussen AC, Davies JE. Protein adsorption at the interface between charged polymer substrata and migrating osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1988;9:24–29. 10.1016/0142-9612(88)90065-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar