Microscopic evaluation of the thickness and structure of the cement and cement–dentin interdiffusion zone after luting posts with three different luting cements

References

• Watzke R, Blunck U, Frankenberger R, et al. Interface homogeneity of adhesively luted glass fiber posts. Dent. Mater. 2008;24:1512–1517.10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, et al. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent. Mater. 2002;18:596–602. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary JM, Jensen ME, Sheth JJ. Load transfer of posts and cores to roots through cements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989;62:298–302. 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90336-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1978;39:401–405.10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80156-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CH. The retention of dental posts. J. Dent. 1982;10:154–165.10.1016/S0300-5712(82)80011-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen D, Poyrazoglu E, Tuncelli B. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements. J. Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:585–589.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01276.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, et al. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998;79:520–525.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70172-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin M, Splieth C, Wilkens M, et al. Effect of cement type on retention of a tapered post with a self-cutting double thread. J. Dent. 2000;28:577–582.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00045-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent. Mater. 2001;17:422–429.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00102-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Gomes G, Augusto V. The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts. J. Prosthodont. 2007;16:154–164.10.1111/jopr.2007.16.issue-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitter K, Paris S, Martus P, et al. A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine. Int. Endod. J. 2004;37:840–848.10.1111/iej.2004.37.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF, et al. Penetration of bonding resins into fibre-reinforced composite posts: a confocal microscopic study. Int. Endod. J. 2005;38:46–51.10.1111/iej.2005.38.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J. Endod. 2004;30:289–301.10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, et al. Retrospective study of clinical behavior of several types of fiber posts. Am. J. Dent. 2000;13:B15–B18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, et al. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998;80:151–157.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70103-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhara KS, Mankar S, Jayshankar CM, et al. Scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts and composite resin: an in vitro study. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2014;6:74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998;80:280–301.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon DL1, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: part II. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1992;68:885–890.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90544-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermilyea SG, Kuffler MJ, Huget EF. The effects of die relief agent on the retention of full coverage castings. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1983;50:207–210.10.1016/0022-3913(83)90015-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembree JH Jr, Cooper EWJr. Effect of die relief on retention of cast crowns and inlays. Oper. Dent. 1979;4:104–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad MF1, Rocha EP, Assunção WG. Cementation of prosthetic restorations: from conventional cementation to dental bonding concept. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2011;22:952–958.10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, et al. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:128–133.10.1111/jor.2005.32.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working group 4 materials: cementation. Clin. Oral Implan. Res. 2007;18:193–204.10.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-s3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SN, Kipnis V. The three-dimensional effects of adjustment and cementation on crown seating. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1993;6:248–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, et al. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self- etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J. Adhes. Dent. 2006;8:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al. J. Adhes. Dent. 2005;7:235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio C, Chiesa M, Lombardini M, et al. Influence of ethanol drying on the bond between fiber posts and root canals: SEM analysis. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Aleisa KI. Bond strengths of custom cast and prefabricated posts luted with two cements. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Oper. Dent. 2011;36:266–273.10.2341/10-236-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary JM, Holmes DC, Johnson WT. Post and core retention with different cements. Gen. Dent. 1995;43:416–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aguiar TR1, Vermelho PM, André CB, et al. Interfacial ultramorphology evaluation of resin luting cements to dentin: a correlative scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analysis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2013;76:1234–1239. 10.1002/jemt.v76.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, et al. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J. Dent. Res. 2008;87:974–979.10.1177/154405910808701012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, et al. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on dentin microtensile bond strengths and nanoleakage of luting cements. J. Dent. 2009;37:440–448.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:963–971. 
10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silveira Teixeira, C, Santos Felippe MC, Silva-Sousa YT, et al. Interfacial evaluation of experimentally weakened roots restored with adhesive materials and fibre posts: an SEM analysis. J. Dent. 2008;36:672–682.10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar