Numerical study of the local behaviour of adhesive bonds under dynamic loading

References

• Galliot C, Rousseau J, Verchery G. Drop weight tensile impact testing of adhesively bonded carbon/epoxy laminate joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012;35:68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea MD, da Silva LFM. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part L. J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2009;223:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Adams RD, Blackman BRK, et al. Higher rate and impact tests. In: da Silva LFM, Dillard DA, Blackman B, Adams RD,editors. Testing adhesive joints. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2012. p. 273–317.
   Google Scholar
• Galliot C. Static and dynamic behavior of adhesively bonded composite laminates [PhD thesis]. ISAT Nevers (France): University of Burgundy; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Goglio L. Impact tests. In: da Silva LFM, Achsner A, Adams RD, editors. Handbook of adhesion technology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. p. 503–532.
   Google Scholar
• ASTMD950-03. Standard test method for impact strength of adhesive bonds. ASTM D950–03; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Harris JA. A critical assessment of the block impact test for measuring the impact strength of adhesive bonds. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1996;16:61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili SMR, Shokuhfar A, Hoseini SD, et al. Experimental study of the influence of adhesive reinforcement in lap joints for composite structures subjected to mechanical loads. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2008;28:436–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goglio L, Rossetto M. Impact rupture of structural adhesive joints under different stress combinations. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2008;35:635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato C, Ikegami K. Strength of adhesively-bonded butt joints of tubes subjected to combined high-rate loads. J. Adhes. 1999;70:57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goglio L, Peroni L, Peroni M, et al. High strain-rate compression and tension behaviour of an epoxy bi-component adhesive. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2008;28:329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykhere SL, Kumar P, Singh RK, et al. Dynamic shear strength of adhesive joints made of metallic and composite adherents. Mater. Des. 2010;31:2102–2109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama T, Nakai K. Determination of the impact tensile strength of structural adhesive butt joints with a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015;56:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya UK, Gautam ARS, Hosur M, et al. Experimental-numerical studies of transverse impact response of adhesively bonded lap joints in composite structures. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2006;26:184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang SS, Yang C, Zhao Y. Impact response of single-lap composite joints. Compos. Eng. 1995;5:1011–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi I, Sawa T, Suga H. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to impact bending moments. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2002;16:1327–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, et al. The impact wedge-peel performance of structural adhesives. J. Mater. Sci. 2000;35:1867–1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Rodriguez Sanchez FS. The fracture behaviour of structural adhesives under high rates of testing. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2009;76:2868–2889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTMD1002-10. Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-metal). ASTM D1002–10; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Park H, Kim H. Damage resistance of single lap adhesive composite joints by transverse ice impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2010;37:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2007;27:227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard JY. Numerical analysis of edge effects in adhesively-bonded assemblies application to the determination of the adhesive behaviour. Comput. Struct. 2008;86:1704–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Créac’hcadec R, Jamin G, Cognard JY, et al. Experimental analysis of the mechanical behaviour of a thick flexible adhesive under tensile/compression-shear loads. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2014;48:258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yosibash Z. Computing singular solutions of elliptic boundary value problems in polyhedral domains using the p-fem. Appl. Numer. Math. 2000;33:71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTMD3983-98. Standard test method for measuring strength and shear modulus of nonrigid adhesives by the thick-adherend tensile-lap specimen. ASTM D3983–98; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ISO11003-2. Adhesives-determination of shear behaviour of structural adhesives-part 2: tensile test method using thick adherends. ISO 11003-2; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cognard JY, Créac’hcadec R, Sohier L, et al. Influence of adhesive thickness on the behaviour of bonded assemblies under shear loadings using a modified TAST fixture. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2010;30:257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard JY, Créac’hcadec R, Sohier L, et al. Analysis of the nonlinear behavior of adhesives in bonded assemblies -- comparison of TAST and Arcan tests. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2008;28:393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Créac’hcadec R, Sohier L, Cellard C, et al. An arcan tensile compression shear test reducing the edge effects suited for the determination of the load-displacement behaviour of adhesives in bonded assemblies. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2015; 61: 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcan L, Arcan M, Daniel L. Sem fractography of pure and mixed mode interlaminar fracture in graphite/epoxy composites. Vol. 948. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM Technical Publication; 1987. p. 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cognard JY, Davies P, Sohier L, et al. A study of the non-linear behaviour of adhesively-bonded composite assemblies. Compos. Struct. 2006;76:34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard JY, Davies P, Gineste B, et al. Development of an improved adhesive test method for composite assembly design. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005;65:359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard JY, Créac’hcadec R. Analysis of the non linear behaviour of an adhesive in bonded assemblies under shear loadings. proposal of an improved tast test. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2009;23:1333–1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Abaqus 6.12 Documentation. Providence, RI, USA; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Belingardi G, Goglio L, Tarditi A. Investigating the effect of spew and chamfer size on the stresses in metal/plastics adhesive joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2002;22:273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye RH, Heller M. Through-thickness shape optimisation of bonded repairs and lap-joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2002;22:7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang TP, Mallick PK. Effect of spew geometry on stresses in single lap adhesive joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1998;18:167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispler AR, Tong L, Grant SP, et al. Shape optimisation of adhesive fillets. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2000;20:221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar