Adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite using different surface conditioning methods

References

• D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007;9:319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJ. Tooth colored inlays: state of the art. J. Ir. Dent. Assoc. 1992;38:2–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, et al. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001;85:386–395.10.1067/mpr.2001.114267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength. Clin. Oral Invest. 2009;13:317–323.10.1007/s00784-008-0228-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Giannini M, Oliveira MT, et al. Effects of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2004;12:45–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, et al. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent. Mater. 1992;8:193–196.10.1016/0109-5641(92)90082-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994;72:189–193.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura GM, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, et al. Enhancement of resin bonding to heat-cured composite resin. Oper. Dent. 1996;21:249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ. Composite inlay/luting resin bond strength- surface treatment effects. J. Dent. 1996;24:129–135.10.1016/0300-5712(95)00054-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenbarger GC, Swenney WT, Bowen RL. Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1967;74:753–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Greener EH, Lautenschlager EP. Shear bond strengths of two resin luting cements to laboratory-cure prosthetic composite resin. Am. J. Dent. 1993;6:13–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin CT, Lee SY, Keh ES, et al. Influence of silanization and filler fraction on aged dental composites. J. Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:919–926.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00573.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J. Adhes. Dent 2007;9:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Alander P, Valittu PK, et al. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005;16:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam LE, Mc Comb D. Shear bond strengths of resin luting cement to laboratory-made composite resin veneers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1991;66:314–321.10.1016/0022-3913(91)90256-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura H, Kato H, Atsuta M. Shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain of two luting cements in combination with three surface treatments. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997;78:511–517.10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70068-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Ritter AV. Class I and II indirect tooth-colored restorations. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, editors. Art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. Saint Louis (MO): Mosby; 2006. p. 603–622.
   Google Scholar
• Türkmen C, Durkan M, Cimilli H, et al. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2011;19:363–369.10.1590/S1678-77572011005000011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSchepper EJ, Tate TH, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to microfilled composites. Am. J. Dent. 1993;6:235–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J. Dent. Res. 1984;63:1396–1399.10.1177/00220345840630121101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JC, Hart DA, Estey AW, et al. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90:18–23.10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00217-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üşümez A, Aykent F. Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces prepared with acid and Er, Cr:YSGG laser etching. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, et al. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part 1 - microtensile bond strengths. J. Adhes. Dent. 2006;8:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm K-JM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive materials: a report of the ASC MD 156 task group on test methods for adhesion of restorative materials. Dent. Mater. 1991;7:74–83.10.1016/0109-5641(91)90049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentine: a brief history and state of art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dérand P, Dérand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2000;13:131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, et al. Tensile bond strength of four resin luting agents bonded to bovine enamel and dentin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;89:558–564.10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00177-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, et al. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005;93:551–558.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, et al. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J. Dent. 2009;37:848–856.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHoff PH, Annusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent. Mater. 1995;11:126–131.10.1016/0109-5641(95)80047-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M, et al. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surface of composite resins. J. Dent. Res. 1982;61:791–796.10.1177/00220345820610062801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel M, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:498–508.10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, et al. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997;77:122–126.10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio TT, Lastumäki TM, Vallittu PK. Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent. Mater. 2001;17:80–86.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00064-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders W. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J. Dent. 1990;18:158–162.10.1016/0300-5712(90)90059-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent. Mater. 2003;19:575–583.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori S, Minami H, Minesaki Y, et al. Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching on shear bond strength of an indirect resin composite to an adhesive cement. Dent. Mater. J. 2008;27:515–522.10.4012/dmj.27.515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am. J. Dent. 1994;7:200–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, et al. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;89:479–488.10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J. Dent. 2008;36:969–976.10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, et al. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2005;17:224–235.10.1111/jerd.2005.17.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pontes AP, Oshima HM, Pacheco JF, et al. Shear bond strength of direct composite repairs in indirect composite systems. Gen. Dent. 2005;53:343–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valandro LF, Pelogia F, Galhano G, et al. Surface conditioning of a composite used for ınlay/onlay restorations: effect on μTBS to resin cement. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007;9:495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendeke J, Özcan M. Effect of physico-chemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007;9:399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga M, et al. Survival and complication rates of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2016. (Epub). doi: 10.1177/0022034516652848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar