Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength between ceramic systems and metal bracketsFootnote

Presented at the FDI Annual World Dental Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, August 2013.

References

• Cochran D, O’Keefe KL, Turner DT, et al. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:297–300.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70188-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:285–290.10.1093/ortho/26.4.285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GA. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain—Bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:245–252.10.1016/0889-5406(88)90034-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, et al. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:540–546.10.1016/S0889-5406(02)56911-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman SM, Dressler KB, Grenadier MR. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:503–506.10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90356-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kao EC, Boltz KC, Johnston WM. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to porcelain veneer laminates. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:458–468.10.1016/0889-5406(88)90003-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachrisson Y, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:420–430.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70124-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukiattrakoon B, Samruajbenjakul B. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:87–93.10.1093/ejo/cjp055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock BO, Eick JD, Ackerman RJ, et al. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;106:358–364.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70056-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkkahraman H, Kucukesmen HC. Porcelain surface-conditioning techniques and the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:440–443.10.1093/ejo/cjl026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panah FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS empress 2. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:409–414.10.1111/jopr.2008.17.issue-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prost Dent. 1995;73:464–470.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa T, Horie K, Aida M, et al. The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater. 1992;8:238–240.10.1016/0109-5641(92)90092-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachrisson BU, Büyükyılmaz T. Recent advances in bonding to gold, amalgam and ceramic. J Clin Orthod. 1993;27:661–75.
   Google Scholar
• Major PW, Koehler JR, Manning KE. 24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:322–329.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70028-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebbe B, Stein E. Orthodontic brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:431–436.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70125-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, et al. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:402–406.10.1093/ejo/cjn118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassaei S, Moradi F, Aghili H, et al. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid. Orthodont (Chic.) 2013;14:e82–e87.10.11607/ortho.856
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini MH, Sobouti F, Etemadi A, et al. Shear bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic porcelain treated by Nd:YAG laser and hydrofluoric acid. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:837–841.10.1007/s10103-013-1458-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, et al. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:66–69.10.1067/mpr.2003.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e100–e121.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulet JF, Van Meerbeek B. Editorial: statistics: a nuisance, a tool, or a must? J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:287–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:508–513.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70170-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ, Lee RB. Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1075–1081.10.1177/00220345890680060401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addison O, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM. The effect of thermocycling on the strength of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials. Dent Mater. 2003;19:291–297.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00046-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guruprasada, Rivankar N, Dhiman RK, et al. Evaluation of the effect of surface preparation using phosphoric acid and luting cement on the flexural strength of porcelain laminate veneering material. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015; 71:299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:355–359.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zeng J, Wang S, et al. Influence of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;255:416–418.10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves PR, Moraes RR, Costa AR, et al. Effect of etching time and light source on the bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:245–248.10.1590/S0103-64402011000300011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf DM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain. Am J Dent. 1993;6:155–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Uemura ES, et al. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a resin-based cement to ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2006; 17: 290–295.
   Google Scholar
• Güler AU, Yilmaz F, Yenisey M, et al. Effect of acid etching time and a self-etching adhesive on the shear bond strength of composite resin to ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:21–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:387–392.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70183-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poosti M, Jahanbin A, Mahdavi P, et al. Porcelain conditioning with Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser for bracket bonding in orthodontics. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:321–324.10.1007/s10103-010-0878-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar