Bond strength of glass carbomer material to enamel and dentin following different surface pretreatments

References

• Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e100–e121.10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtanus JD, Huysmans M-CD. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study. J Dent. 2007;35:156–162.10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito CR, Velasco LG, Bonini GA, et al. Glass ionomer cement hardness after different materials for surface protection. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93:243–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algera T, Kleverlaan C, De Gee A, et al. The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. Eur J Orthodont. 2005;27:472–476.10.1093/ejo/cji041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ıonomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7:16–32.10.3390/jfb7030016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 2014;22:67–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, et al. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent. 2005;33:459–467.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater. 2002;18:454–462.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00068-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater. 2001;17:445–455.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho E, Cardoso M, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1347–1357.10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanumiharja M, Burrow M, Tyas M. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners. J Dent. 2000;28:361–366.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamama H, Burrow M, Yiu C. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives. Aust Dent J. 2014;59:193–200.10.1111/adj.2014.59.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olegário IC, Malagrana APVFP, Kim SSH, et al. Mechanical properties of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and nanoparticle glass carbomer. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook WD. An investigation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 1981;26:105–112.10.1111/adj.1981.26.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarak EH, El-Badrawy W, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104:92–97.10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60098-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci. 2011;53:273–282.10.2334/josnusd.53.273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1076–1081.10.1177/00220345830620101501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, et al. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yiu CK, Tay FR, King NM, et al. Interaction of glass-ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res. 2004;83:283–289.10.1177/154405910408300403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Glass-ionomer adhesion: the mechanisms at the interface. J Dent. 2006;34:615–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Smales R, Ngo H, et al. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001;2:153–67.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Tang T, Zhang ZL, et al. Improvement of enamel bond strengths for conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers: acid-etching vs. conditioning. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14:1013–1024.10.1631/jzus.B1300034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Development of a self-etch adhesive for resin-modified glass ıonomers. J Dent Res. 2006;85:349–353.10.1177/154405910608500413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth ınterfaces. J Dent Res. 2007;86:656–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliades T, Brantley W. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13–23.10.1093/ejo/22.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura KR, Tay F, Endo T, et al. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ıonomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:315–339.10.4012/dmj.27.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2008;6:471–479.
   Google Scholar