Experimental investigation of repair of impact-damaged aircraft winglet under static bending moments

References

• Hale J. Boeing 787 from the ground up. Aero Mag Boeing. 2006;24:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Heslehurst RB. Defects and damage in composite materials and structures. CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Smith LJ. Adhesive-bonded scarf and stepped-lap joints. Long Beach (CA): Mcdonnell-Douglas Corporation; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Baker AA, Jones R. Bonded repair of aircraft structures. Netherlands: Springer; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambides MN, Hardouin R, Kinloch AJ, et al. Adhesively-bonded repairs to fibre-composite materials I. experimental. Compos Part A-Appl S. 1998;29:1371–1381.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambides MN, Kinloch AJ, Matthews FL. Adhesively-bonded repairs to fibre-composite materials II. Finite element modelling. Compos Part A-Appl S. 1998;29:1383–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odi RA, Friend CM. A comparative study of finite element models for the bonded repair of composite structures. J Reinf Plast Comp. 2002;21:311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her SC, Chao M. Adhesively bonded patch repair of composite laminates. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25:2569–2585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman AB, Wang CH. Improved design methods for scarf repairs to highly strained composite aircraft structure. Compos Struct. 2006;75(1–4):132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katnam KB, Da Silva LFMD, Young TM. Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: a review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2013;61:26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Xu F, Feng W, et al. Experiment and design methods of composite scarf repair for primary-load bearing structures. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2016;88:27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Salmon FT, Pocius AV. Modeling of cohesive failure processes in structural adhesive bonded joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18:287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SB, Sridhar I, Sivashanker S, et al. Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv. 2006;132:113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Gunnion AJ. On the design methodology of scarf repairs to composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ. Experimental and finite element analysis on the performance of vacuum-assisted resin infused single scarf repairs. Mater Des. 2008;29:436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittingham B, Baker AA, Harman A, et al. Micrographic studies on adhesively bonded scarf repairs to thick composite aircraft structure. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2009;40:1419–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh JY, Georgiadis S, Orifici AC, et al. Effects of bondline flaws on damage tolerance of composite scarf joints. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2013;55(7):110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSF, Domingues JJMS. Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2007;21:855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridha M, Tan VBC, Tay TE. Traction-separation laws for progressive failure of bonded scarf repair of composite panel. Compos Struct. 2011;93:1239–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSF, Domingues JJMS, et al. Computational modelling of the residual strength of repaired composite laminates using a cohesive damage model. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2008;22:1565–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutis C, Hu FZ. Failure analysis of scarf-patch-repaired carbon fiber/epoxy laminates under compression. AIAA J. 2000;38:737–740.
   Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Gunnion AJ. Optimum shapes of scarf repairs. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2009;40:1407–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AMG, Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSFD, et al. Numerical evaluation of three-dimensional scarf repairs in carbon-epoxy structures. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;30:329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng XQ, Yasir B, Hu R, et al. Study of tensile failure mechanisms in scarf repaired CFRP laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2013;41:177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramantani DA, Campilho RDSG, De Moura MFSFD, et al. Stress and failure analysis of repaired sandwich composite beams using a cohesive damage model. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2010;12:369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi S, Kinloch AJ, Matthews FL, et al. The static mechanical performance of repaired composite sandwich beams: part II – finite element modelling. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2003;5:267–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi S, Kinloch AJ, Matthews FL, et al. The static mechanical performance of repaired composite sandwich beams: part I – experimental characterisation. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2003;5:179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirollos BWM, Trede R, Lampen P. The experimental static mechanical performance of ironed repaired GFRP–honeycomb sandwich beams. J Sandwich Struct Mater. 2012;14:694–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Guan Z, Guo X, et al. Process factors and edgewise compressive properties of scarf-repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Appl Compos Mater. 2014;21:689–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcı O, Çoban O, Bora MÖ, et al. Experimental investigation of single and repeated impacts for repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Mat Sci Een A-Struct. 2017;682:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar