Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic modifications for cell-based immunofluorescence assay

References

• Lee SK, Lee ST. The laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. J Epilepsy Res. 2016;6(2):45–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogric M, Tercelj M, Praprotnik S, et al. Detection of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive overview of methodology pitfalls and benefits. Immunol Res. 2017;65(1):172–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun N, Zhou C, Zhou X, et al. Use of a rat basophil leukemia (RBL) cell-based immunological assay for allergen identification, clinical diagnosis of allergy, and identification of anti-allergy agents for use in immunotherapy. J Immunotoxicol. 2015;12(2):199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hematian A, Sadeghifard N, Mohebi R, et al. Traditional and modern cell culture in virus diagnosis. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(2):77–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torino S, Corrado B, Iodice M, et al. PDMS-based microfluidic devices for cell culture. Inventions. 2018;3(3):65–14.
   Google Scholar
• Xu D, Huang X, Guo J, et al. Automatic smartphone-based microfluidic biosensor system at the point of care. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;110:78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong J, Ueda H. ELISA-type assays of trace biomarkers using microfluidic methods. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed. 2017;9:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Singh RK, Mandal S, et al. Plasma modification of polymer surfaces and their utility in building biomedical microdevices. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2010;24(15–16):2707–2739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao CW. Polymer microfluidics: simple, low-cost fabrication process bridging academic lab research to commercialized production. Micromachines. 2016;7(12):225–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Arakaki A, Takeyama H, et al. Detection of cryptosporidium parvum oocysts using a microfluidic device equipped with the SUS micromesh and FITC-labeled antibody. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;96(2):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chiao M. Anti-fouling coatings of poly(dimethylsiloxane) devices for biological and biomedical applications. J Med Biol Eng. 2015;35(2):143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokaltun A, Yarmush ML, Asatekin A, et al. Recent advances in nonbiofouling PDMS surface modification strategies applicable to microfluidic technology. Technology. 2017;5(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Ellis AV, Voelcker NH. Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis. 2010;31(1):2–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoozgar B, Morarescu D, Sheardown H. Sulfadiazine modified PDMS as a model material with the potential for the mitigation of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;111:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah YJ, Koh YT, Lim K, et al. Simple surface engineering of polydimethylsiloxane with polydopamine for stabilized mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and multipotency. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18162–18112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuddannaya S, Chuah YJ, Lee MH, et al. Surface chemical modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) for the enhanced adhesion and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(19):9777–9784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Z, Ross D, Jia W, et al. Bioactive polydimethylsiloxane surface for optimal human mesenchymal stem cell sheet culture. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(2):167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trantidou T, Elani Y, Parsons E, et al. Hydrophilic surface modification of PDMS for droplet microfluidics using a simple, quick, and robust method via PVA deposition. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2017;3(1):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valamehr B, Jonas SJ, Polleux J, et al. Hydrophobic surfaces for enhanced differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(38):14459–14464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu MH. Simple poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface modification to control cell adhesion. Surf Interface Anal. 2009;41(1):11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu VA, Jastromb WE, Bhatia SN. Engineering protein and cell adhesivity using PEO-terminated triblock polymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60(1):126–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Choi DS, Nguyen YH, et al. Studying cancer stem cell dynamics on PDMS surfaces for microfluidics device design. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2332–2338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah YJ, Kuddannaya S, Lee MH, et al. The effects of poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface silanization on the mesenchymal stem cell fate. Biomater Sci. 2015;3(2):383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuddannaya S, Bao J, Zhang Y. Enhanced in vitro biocompatibility of chemically modified poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces for stable adhesion and long-term investigation of brain cerebral cortex cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(45):25529–25538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Yamamoto T, Kojima N, et al. Stable immobilization of rat hepatocytes as hemispheroids onto collagen-conjugated poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces: importance of direct oxygenation through PDMS for both formation and function. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99(6):1472–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuchowska A, Kwiatkowski P, Jastrzebska E, et al. Adhesion of MRC-5 and A549 cells on poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface modified by proteins. Electrophoresis. 2016;37(3):536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with Image J. Biophotonics Intern. 2004;11:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Greivenkamp JE. Field guide to geometrical optics. Bellingham (WA): SPIE Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gomathi N, Mishra I, Varma S, et al. Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) through oxygen and nitrogen plasma treatment to improve its characteristics towards biomedical applications. Surf Topogr-Metrol. 2015;3:3607–3619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Jia W, Long F, et al. Polydopamine and collagen coated micro-grated polydimethylsiloxane for human mesenchymal stem cell culture. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:142–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adly NY, Hassani H, Tran AQ, et al. Observation of chemically protected polydimethylsiloxane: towards crack-free PDMS. Soft Matter. 2017;13(37):6297–6303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong L, Chen P, Zhou Q. Adhesion promotion between PDMS and glass by oxygen plasma pre-treatment. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28(11):1046–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malikov EY, Muradov MB, Akperov OH, et al. Synthesis and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol based multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2014;61:129–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napaphak J, Thaned P, Ekapol L. Preparation and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)-poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) mucoadhesive buccal patches for delivery of lidocaine HCL. Int J App. Pharm. 2018;10:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HR, Chang PC. Novel pluronic-chitosan micelle as an ocular delivery system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101(5):689–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitrenko ME, Penkova AV, Atta RR, et al. The development and study of novel membrane materials based on polyphenylene isophthalamide – pluronic F127 composite. Mater Des. 2019;165:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Yl, Wang J, Liu HZ. FTIR spectroscopic investigation of effects of temperature and concentration on PEO − PPO − PEO block copolymer properties in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules. 2002;35(16):6426–6431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg M, Shoham G. FTIR spectra of solid poly-l-lysine in the stretching NH mode range. Biophys Chem. 2007;125(1):166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili AA, Ahmad MR. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Actuat B Chem. 2015;16:18149–18184.
   Google Scholar
• Bodas D, Khan-Malek C. Hydrophilization and hydrophobic recovery of PDMS by oxygen plasma and chemical treatment—an SEM investigation. Sensor Actuat B Chem. 2007;123(1):368–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson BJ, Gillmor SD, Braun JM, et al. Long-term reduction in poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface hydrophobicity via cold-plasma treatments. Langmuir. 2013;29(42):12990–12996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Li CM, Zhou Q, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane) solid surface for immunoassay. Bioconjug Chem. 2007;18(2):281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camino G, Lomakin SM, Lazzari M. Polydimethylsiloxane thermal degradation part 1. Kinetic Aspects, Polym. 2001;42(6):2395–2402.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley WW, Feghhi S, Han SJ, et al. Thermal fracture of oxidized polydimethylsiloxane during soft lithography of nanopost arrays. J Micromech Microeng. 2011;21(5):054013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardhaoui M, Naciri M, Mullen T, et al. Evaluation of cell behaviour on atmospheric plasma deposited siloxane and fluorosiloxane coatings. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2010;24(5):889–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Strohmeyer N, Wang J, et al. Increasing throughput of AFM-based single cell adhesion measurements through multisubstrate surfaces. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015;6:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaojing S, Edmond WKY, Heather ASU, et al. Microfluidic cell culture and its application in high-throughput drug screening: cardiotoxicity assay for hERG channels. J Biomol Screen. 2010;16:101–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin H, Marshall D. Microfluidics for single cell analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(1):110–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar