A framework for classification of snow- and icephobicity

References

• Gent RW, Dart NP, Cansdale JT. Aircraft icing. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2000;358(1776):2873–2911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savadjiev K, Farzaneh M. Modeling of icing and ice shedding on overhead power lines based on statistical analysis of meteorological data. IEEE Trans Power Delivery. 2004;19(2):715–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent O, Ilinca A. Anti-icing and de-icing techniques for wind turbines: critical review. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2011;65(1):88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawluk RE, Chen Y, She Y. Photovoltaic electricity generation loss due to snow – a literature review on influence factors, estimation, and mitigation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;107:171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher F, Schaum D, Herbster C, et al. Analysis of causes of icing conditions which contributed to the crash of continental flight 3407. Daytona Beach (FL): Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuo Y, Håkonsen V, He Z, et al. Enhancing the mechanical durability of icephobic surfaces by introducing autonomous self-healing function. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(14):11972–11978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo P, Zheng Y, Wen M, et al. Icephobic/anti-icing properties of micro/nanostructured surfaces. Adv Mater. 2012;24(19):2642–2648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojoudi H, Wang M, Boscher ND, et al. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter. 2016;12(7):1938–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrebæk P-OA, Rønneberg S, Li T, et al. Snow adhesion on icephobic surfaces. (Submitted Publ.) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Varanasi KK, Deng T, Smith JD, et al. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97(23):234102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønneberg S, He J, Zhang Z. The need for standards in low ice adhesion surface research: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(3):319–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen L. Ice adhesion – Theory, measurements and countermeasures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26(4–5):413–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovin K, Dhyani A, Thouless MD, et al. Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing. Science. 2019;364(6438):371–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Gong Q, Zhan S, et al. Robust anti-icing performance of a flexible superhydrophobic surface. Adv Mater. 2016;28(35):7729–7735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60529. Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Codes). Geneva Int Electrotech Comm Ed. 2001;2.1:1–3. http://www.dsmt.com/pdf/resources/iprating.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rønneberg S, Laforte C, Volat C, et al. The effect of ice type on ice adhesion. AIP Adv. 2019;9:5086242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen L, Zhang J, Karlsson T, et al. Modelling the growth of large rime ice accretions. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2018;151:133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejazi V, Sobolev K, Nosonovsky M. From superhydrophobicity to icephobicity: forces and interaction analysis. Sci Rep. 2013;3:e02194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Vågenes ET, Delabahan C, et al. Room temperature characteristics of polymer-based low ice adhesion surfaces. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Xiao S, Gao H, et al. Multiscale crack initiator promoted super-low ice adhesion surfaces. Soft Matter. 2017;13(37):6562–6568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovin K, Kobaku SPR, Lee DH, et al. Designing durable icephobic surfaces. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3):e1501496–e1501496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Zheng S, Bellido-Aguilar DA, et al. Transparent icephobic coatings using bio-based epoxy resin. Mater Des. 2018;140:516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irajizad P, Al-Bayati A, Eslami B, et al. Stress-localized durable icephobic surfaces. Mater Horiz. 2019;6(4):758–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh DP, Singh JP. Delayed freezing of water droplet on silver nanocolumnar thin film. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;102(24):243112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZJ, Kwon DJ, DeVries KL, et al. Frost formation and anti-icing performance of a hydrophobic coating on aluminum. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2015;60:132–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Q, Pang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Mechanism of delayed frost growth on superhydrophobic surfaces with jumping condensates: more than interdrop freezing. Langmuir. 2014;30(51):15416–15422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work A, Lian Y. A critical review of the measurement of ice adhesion to solid substrates. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2018;98:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønneberg S, Zhuo Y, Laforte C, et al. Interlaboratory study of ice adhesion using different techniques. Coatings. 2019;9(10):678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrebæk P-O, Jelle BP, Klein-Paste A, et al. A gravity-based method for snow adhesion measurements. (Submitted Publ.) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss A, Weiss H. Photovoltaic cell electrical heating system for removing snow on panel including verification, in. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(25):24561–24568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews RW, Pearce JM. The effect of spectral albedo on amorphous silicon and crystalline silicon solar photovoltaic device performance. Sol Energy. 2013;91:233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar