Effects of material properties on the mechanical and durability behaviors of Khorasan mortar mixtures: a review

References

• Örmecioğlu HT. Tarihi Yapıların Yapısal Güçlendirilmesinde Ana İlkeler ve Yaklaşımlar [Main principles and aproaches in structural strenghtening of historical buildings]. J Polytechnic. 2010;13(3):233–237 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü TC (T.R. Directorate General of Foundations). Yurt İçi Taşınmaz Vakıf Kültür Varlıklarına Örnekler [Examples of domestic immovable foundation cultural assets [accessed 2020 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.vgm.gov.tr/faaliyetler/restore-edilen-tasinmaz-vakif-kultur-varliklari/yurt-ici-tasinmaz-vakif-kultur-varliklarina-ornekler (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Topçu İB, Göbel S, Işıkdağ B. Genleştirilmiş perlitin horasan harçlarında kullanılması [Using expanded perlite in Khorasan mortars]. 2nd International Sustainable Building Sympodium; Ankara, Turkey; 2015. p. 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Moropoulou A, Bakolas A, Anagnostopoulou S. Composite materials in ancient structures. Cem Concr Compos. 2005;27(2):295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman M, Güner A, Aksoy İ. The history and properties of khorasan mortar and concrete. Turkish and Islamic Science and Technology in the 16th Century, ITU Research Centre of History of Science and Technology, İstanbul, Turkey; 1986. p. 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Böke H, Akkurt S, Ipekoğlu B. Tarihi yapılarda kullanılan horasan harcı ve sıvalarının özellikleri [The properties of Khorasan mortar and plasters used in historical buildings]. Yapı Magazine. 2004;269:90–95 (in Turkish)
   Google Scholar
• Mavioğlu ÜA. Farklı Puzolanik Katkılar ile Hazırlanan Horasan Harçlarının Değişen Parametrelerinin İncelenmesi [Investigation in changing parameters of Horasan mortars with different puzzolanic substitutes] [M. A Thesis]. Istanbul Technical University; 2011. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Gür D. Tarihi Yapıların Onarımında Kullanılmak Üzere Puzolan Katkılı Hidrolik Kireç Esaslı Onarım Harcı Üretilme Olanaklarının Araştırılması [A study on hydraulic lime mortars with pozzolan addition for historic masonry repairs] [M.A Thesis]. İstanbul Technical University; 2019 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Ashurst J, Ashurst N. Mortars, plasters and renders. Practical building conservation: English heritage technical handbook. Surrey, UK: Gower Technical Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Küçükkaya AG. Yapı Taşlarının Restorasyonu. Istanbul, Turkey: Özlem Matbaacılık; 2014 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Torraca G. Porous building materials: materials science for architectural conservation. International Centre for the Study of The Preservation and The Restoration of Cultural Property, Rome, Italy; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Dayı M. Tarihi Yapılarda Kullanılan Horasan Harçlarının İncelenmesi ve Alternatif Horasan Harçlarının Üretilmesi [Examination of the Khorasan mortars used in historical buildings and production of alternative Khorasan mortar] [PhD. Dissertation]. Gazi University; 2017 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Seabra MP, Paiva H, Labrincha JA, et al. Admixtures effect on fresh state properties of aerial lime based mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23(2):1147–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgen Ö. Horasan Harcı Üzerine Deneysel Çalışmalar [Experimental studies on Khorasan mortar]. Ankara, Turkey: Culture and Tourism Ministry; 2012 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Böke H, Akkurt S, Uǧurlu BIE. Onarım Amaçlı Horasan Harç ve Sıvaların Hazırlanması [Preparation of Khorasan mortar and plasters for repair]. Mater Architect. 2007;3:68–72 (in Turkish)
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz C. Portland Çimentosu Kullanımının Horasan Harcı Özelliklerine Etkisi [The effect of using Portland cement over the properties of Khorasan mortar] [Master Thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sickels LB. Organic additives in mortars. Edinburgh Architect Res. 1981;8:7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Benchiheub D, Amouri C, Houari H, et al. Effect of natural pozzolana and polypropylene fibers on the performance of lime mortar for old buildings restoration. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(12):1324–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gani MSJ. Cement and concrete. Florida, USA: CRC Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan ST, Erdoğan TY. Bağlayıcı Malzemelerin ve Betonun Onbin Yıllık Tarihi [Ten thousand-year history of binding materials and concrete]. Ankara, Turkey: METU Press Publishing; 2007 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Mehta PK, Monteiro PJ. Concrete; microstructure, properties and materials. New York City, USA: McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lea FM. Investigations on Pozzolanas. Building research. Technical Paper No: 27; 1940.p. 1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lanas J, Alvarez JI. Masonry repair lime-based mortars: factors affecting the mechanical behaviour. Cem Concr Res. 2003;33(11):1867–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanas J, Bernal JP, Bello MA, et al. Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(12):2191–2201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüzer N, Doran B, Berilgen MM, et al. Tarihi yapıların tuğla duvar özgün malzeme özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ve yük altında davranışının model deneylerle araştırılması [Determination of original brick wall material properties of historical buildings and investigation of their behavior under load with model experiments]. Ankara, Turkey: TUBITAK; 2015 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Faria P, Fernando H, Rato V. Comparative evaluation of lime mortars for architectural conservation. J Cult Heritage. 2008;9(3):338–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalha MG, Veiga MR, De Brito J. The time factor in lime quality. 7th International Brick Masonry Conference Proceedings, London, UK; 2006. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Grilo J, Silva AS, Faria P, et al. Mechanical and mineralogical properties of natural hydraulic lime-metakaolin mortars in different curing conditions. Constr Build Mater. 2014;51:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva BA, Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A. Influence of natural hydraulic lime content on the properties of aerial lime-based mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2014;72:208–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdoğan TY. Beton [Concrete]. Ankara, Turkey: METU Press Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Cizer Ö, Van Balen K, Van Gemert D. Competition between hydration and carbonation in hydraulic lime and lime-pozzolana mortars. Advanced materials research. 2010;133: 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut Ü. Perlitin puzolanik aktivitesi [Pozzolanic activity of perlite] [PhD. Dissertation]. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul; 2007 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Tokyay M. Cement and concrete mineral admixtures. London: CRC Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gürdal E, Özgünler SA, Kahraman G. Anemas Zindanları’ nın Restorasyonunda Kullanılacak Onarım Harcının Üretimi İçin Yapılan Deneysel Çalışmalar [The experimental studies of the reparation mortar’s production for the restoration of anemas dungeons]. J Restorat Conser Studies. 2009;3:22–34 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Vavričuk A, Bokan-Bosiljkov V, Kramar S. The influence of metakaolin on the properties of natural hydraulic lime-based grouts for historic masonry repair. Constr Build Mater. 2018;172:706–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircan RK, Kaplan G. Yüksek Fırın Cürufu ve Bazalt Lifi Takviyeli Restorasyon Harçlarının Sülfat Dayanıklılığının İncelenmesi [A study on the sulfate resistance of the blast-furnace slag and basalt fiber reinforced restoration mortars]. 6th International Symposium on Conservation and Strengthening of Historical Buildings 2017, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish); 2017. p. 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Iucolano F, Liguori B, Colella C. Fibre-reinforced lime-based mortars: a possible resource for ancient masonry restoration. Constr Build Mater. 2013;38:785–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarelli ML, Sbardella F, Zuena M, et al. Basalt fiber reinforced natural hydraulic lime mortars: a potential bio-based material for restoration. Mater Des. 2014;63:398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato L, Stefanidou M, Milazzo G, et al. Study and evaluation of nano-structured cellulose fibers as additive for restoration of historical mortars and plasters. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4(7):6954–6965.
   Google Scholar
• Altun MG, Özen S, Aghabaglou AM. Polipropilen Lif Kullanımının Doğal Hidrolik Kireçli Harçların Kuruma Büzülmesine Etkisi. [The effect of using polypropylene fiber on drying shrinkage of natural hydraulic lime mortars] Sakarya Univ J Sci. 2018;22(2):427–435 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Işıkdağ B, Topçu IB. The effect of ground granulated blast-furnace slag on properties of Horasan mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2013;40:448–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işıkdağ B, Topçu IB. Improvement of Khorasan mortar with fly ash for restoration of historical buildings. Sci Eng Comp Mater. 2014;21(3):359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinemre M. 2009. Kesme Taş Duvarlarda Kullanılan Tarihi Horasan Harçlarının Mekanik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi [Investigation of mechanical properties of historical khorasan mortars used in cutting stone walls] [M. A. Thesis]. Sakarya University of Applied Sience, Sakarya (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Ersen A, Gürdal E, Güleç A, et al. Geleneksel Harçlar ve Koruma Harçları (Traditional mortars and conservation mortars. J Restor Conserv Studies. 2016;16:36–50. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Pusat SE. 2002. Tarihi Yapıların Onarımında Kullanılacak Harç Türleri [Types of mortar used in the repair of historical buildings] [M. A. Thesis]. Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgal F, Faria J, Jalali S. Some considerations about the use of lime-cement mortars for building conservation purposes in Portugal: a reprehensible option or a lesser evil. Constr Build Mater. 2012;30:488–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbe L, Vitina I, Setina J. The influence of cement on properties of lime mortars. Procedia Eng. 2017;172:325–332.
   Google Scholar
• Silva BA, Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A. Natural hydraulic lime versus cement for blended lime mortars for restoration works. Constr Build Mater. 2015;94:346–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böke H, Akkurt S, Ipekoğlu B, et al. Characteristics of brick used as aggregate in historic brick-lime mortars and plasters. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(6):1115–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğurlu E, Böke H. Koruma amaçlı üretilecek horasan harç ve sıvalarda kullanılacak kirecin ve tuğlaların özellikleri [Properties of lime and bricks used in Khorasan mortars and plasters to be produced for protection]. National Building Materials Congress and Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish); 2010. p. 85–396.
   Google Scholar
• Altaş GK, Özgünler SA, Güldal E. İstanbul'daki Roma Dönemi Saray Yapılarının Horasan Harçlarının İncelenmesi (Khorasan mortar investigation in the roman palace structures in Istanbul]. Found Restor Annual. 2012;4:41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Baronio G, Binda L, Lombardini N. The role of brick pebbles and dust in conglomerates based on hydrated lime and crushed bricks. Constr Build Mater. 1997;11(1):33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos AR, do Rosário Veiga M, Matias L, et al. Evolution of the microstructure of lime based mortars and influence on the mechanical behaviour: the role of the aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2018;187:907–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos AR, Veiga M. d R, Santos Silva A, et al. Durability and compatibility of lime-based mortars: the effect of aggregates. Infrastructures. 2018;3(3):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Silva BA, Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A, et al. Fresh and hardened state behaviour of aerial lime mortars with superplasticizer. Constr Build Mater. 2019;225:1127–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández JM, Duran A, Navarro-Blasco I, et al. Influence of nanosilica and a polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer on the performance of lime mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2013;43:12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Nicolás M, Duran A, Navarro-Blasco I, et al. Study on the effectiveness of PNS and LS superplasticizers in air lime-based mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2016;82:11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izaguirre A, Lanas J, Alvarez JI. Effect of water-repellent admixtures on the behaviour of aerial lime-based mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(11):1095–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izaguirre A, Lanas J, Alvarez JI. Ageing of lime mortars with admixtures: durability and strength assessment. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(7):1081–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachemi M, Hossain KMA, Lambros V, et al. Performance of new viscosity modifying admixtures in enhancing the rheological properties of cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(2):185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 934-2. Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout. Concrete admixtures-definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling. London, United Kingdom:European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Izaguirre A, Lanas J, Alvarez JI. Behaviour of a starch as a viscosity modifier for aerial lime-based mortars. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;80(1):222–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman J, Choo BS. 2003. Advanced concrete technology 3. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A, Silva B, et al. Influence of water reducers on the early age properties of aerial lime mortars. 3rd International Conference on Protection of Historical Constructions, Lisbon, Portugal; 2017. p. 337–338.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C226-19. Standard specification for air-entraining additions for use in the manufacture of air-entraining hydraulic cement. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Atahan HN, Carlos C, Jr,Chae S, et al. The morphology of entrained air voids in hardened cement paste generated with different anionic surfactants. Cem Concr Compos. 2008;30(7):566–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang X, Guo Y, Qiu X. The feasibility of synthetic surfactant as an air entraining agent for the cement matrix. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22(8):1774–1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva BA, Ferreira Pinto AP, Gomes A, et al. Suitability of different surfactants as air-entraining admixtures for lime mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2020;256:118986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Huertas MO. Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: mineralogical and textural changes. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(12):2278–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cultrone G, Sebastian E, Huertas MO. Durability of masonry systems: a laboratory study. Constr Build Mater. 2007;21(1):40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange DA, Ouyang C, Shah SP. Behavior of cement based matrices reinforced by randomly dispersed microfibers. Adv Cem Based Mater. 1996;3(1):20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cao J, Chung DD. Carbon fiber reinforced cement mortar improved by using acrylic dispersion as an admixture. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31(11):1633–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella G, Fiore V, Galtieri G, et al. Effects of natural fibres reinforcement in lime plasters (kenaf and sisal vs. polypropylene. Constr Build Mater. 2014;58:159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal S, Alliche A, Pilvin P. Mechanical behaviour of polymer modified mortars. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;380(1–2):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt AM. Fibre reinforced cement-based (FRC) composites after over 40 years of development in building and civil engineering. Compos Struct. 2008;86(1–3):3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla KK. 1998. Fibrous materials. Cambridge: United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izaguirre A, Lanas J, Alvarez JI. Effect of a polypropylene fibre on the behaviour of aerial lime-based mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(2):992–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdoğdu Ş, Nas M, Nayır S, et al. Uçucu Kül ve Polipropilen Lifli Kireç Harçlarının Çimento Takviyesi ile Mekanik Özelliklerinin İyileştirilmesi [Improvement of mechanical properties of lime mortars containing fly ash and polypropylene fibers by adding cement]. 6th International Symposium on Conservation and Strengthening of Historical Buildings, Trabzon, Turkey; 2017. p. 247–256 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Tekin Ç, Kurugöl S. Çeşitli Organi̇k Katkıların Ki̇reci̇n Karboni̇zasyonu Üzeri̇ndeki Etki̇si̇”, [Impacts of various organic additives on carbonization of lime]. J Facul Eng Architect Gazi Univ. 2012;27(4):717–728.
   Google Scholar
• Alberti LB. 1966. Ten books on architecture. Transatlantic arts. New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock J, Riley HT. 1900. The natural history of pliny. London, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra S. 2003. History of architecture and ancient building materials in India. New Delhi, India: Tech Books International.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckova S, Crhova M, Vankova L, et al. Towards proteomic analysis of milk proteins in historical building materials. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2009;284(1–3):42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diker HF. Belgeler Işığında Fosatti’nin Ayasofya’da Yokettiği İzler ve Ayasofya’da Kullanılan Harç Üzerine Etimolojik ve Deneysel Bir Araştırma [An etymological and experimental research on the traces destroyed by Fosatti in Hagia Sophia and the mortar used in Hagia Sophia in the light of documents]. In: 28th Research Results Meeting, T. R. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, General Directorate of Cultural Assets and Museums, Volume 2, Istanbul, Turkey; 2010 (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Elert K, Sánchez RMG, Benavides-Reyes C, et al. Influence of animal glue on mineralogy, strength and weathering resistance of lime plasters. Constr Build Mater. 2019;226:625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventolà L, Vendrell M, Giraldez P, et al. Traditional organic additives improve lime mortars: new old materials for restoration and building natural stone fabrics. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(8):3313–3318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar