Dependence of adhesion force on contact time due to water thin-film flow revealed with an AFM cantilever at low humidity

References

• Zhao YP, Wang LS, Yu TX. Mechanics of adhesion in MEMS – a review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2003;17(4):519–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaghloul U, Papaioannou G, Bhushan B, et al. On the reliability of electrostatic NEMS/MEMS devices: review of present knowledge on the dielectric charging and stiction failure mechanisms and novel characterization methodologies. Microelectron Reliab. 2011;51(9–11):1810–1818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep. 2005;59(1–6):1–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite FL, Bueno CC, Da Roz AL, et al. Theoretical models for surface forces and adhesion and their measurement using atomic force microscopy. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(10):12773–12856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia R. Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: methods, theory and applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49(16):5850–5884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez-Vilas A, Gonzalez-Martin ML, Labajos-Broncano L, et al. Experimental analysis of the influence of surface topography on the adhesion force as measured by an AFM. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2002;16(13):1737–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farshchi-Tabrizi M, Kappl M, Butt H-J. Influence of humidity on adhesion: an atomic force microscope study. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2008;22(2):181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau A, Regnier S, Delchambre A, et al. Theoretical and experimental study of the influence of AFM tip geometry and orientation on capillary force. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2010;24(15–16):2499–2510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison AJ, Corti DS, Beaudoin SP. Capillary forces in nanoparticle adhesion: a review of AFM methods. Part Sci Technol. 2015;33(5):526–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Chen R, Huang P. Temperature dependence of microscale adhesion force between solid surfaces using an AFM. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2015;29(2):133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Huang P. Study on microscale adhesion between solid surfaces with scanning probe. Sci China Technol Sci. 2013;56(12):2934–2952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak A, Wormeester H, Zandvliet HJW, et al. The influence of instrumental parameters on the adhesion force in a flat-on-flat contact geometry. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;308:106–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak A, Wormeester H, Zandvliet HJW, et al. The influence of instrumental parameters on the adhesion force in a flat-on-rough contact geometry. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;353:1285–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Meng Y. Behaviors of time-dependent and time-independent adhesion forces revealed using an AFM under different humidities and measuremental protocols. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;78:121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Lai T. Influence of lateral movement on level behavior of adhesion force measured repeatedly by an atomic force microscope (AFM) colloid probe in dry conditions. Materials. 2021;14(2):370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedin DL, Rowlen KL. Adhesion forces measured by atomic force microscopy in humid air. Anal Chem. 2000;72(10):2183–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Lio A, Hu J, et al. Wetting and capillary phenomena of water on mica. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102(3):540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando Y. Effect of contact geometry on the pull-off force evaluated under high-vacuum and humid atmospheric conditions. Langmuir. 2008;24(4):1418–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirghi L. Transport mechanisms in capillary condensation of water at a single-asperity nanoscopic contact. Langmuir. 2012;28(5):2558–2566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirghi L, Szoszkiewicz R, Riedo E. Volume of a nanoscale water bridge. Langmuir. 2006;22(3):1093–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Zhao YP. Growth of liquid bridge in AFM. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2007;40(14):4368–4375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich YI, Singh A, Hahn M, et al. Kinetics of liquid annulus formation and capillary forces. Langmuir. 2011;27(22):13514–13523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Mulder P, Kleijn JM, et al. Effect of surface roughness and softness on water capillary adhesion in apolar media. J Phys Chem A. 2012;116(25):6481–6488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Meng Y. Logarithmic contact time dependence of adhesion force and its dominant role among the effects of AFM experimental parameters under low humidity. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;419:294–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Meng Y. Time-dependent dynamic behaviors of a confined liquid to achieve tailored adhesion force with repeated contacts revealed by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir. 2018;34(50):15211–15227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks BL, DeYoreo JJ. Dynamic meniscus growth at a scanning probe tip in contact with a gold substrate. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110(21):10231–10233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter JL, Bechhoefer J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev Sci Instrum. 1993;64(7):1868–1873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvilli J. Intermolecular and surface forces. Singapore: Elsevier; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, et al. Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces – I. Role of asperity geometry. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;232(1):10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao HW, Baró AM, Sáenz JJ. Electrostatic and contact forces in force microscopy. J Vac Sci Technol B. 1991;9(2):1323–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Sun Y, Ding W, et al. The formation of liquid bridge in different operating modes of AFM. Sci China Phys Mech. 2016;59(9):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitorino MV, Vieira A, Marques CA, et al. Direct measurement of the capillary condensation time of a water nanobridge. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai S, Bhushan B. Meniscus and viscous forces during separation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces with liquid-mediated contacts. Mater Sci Eng R. 2008;61(1–6):78–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich YI, Esayanur MS, Moudgil BM. Capillary forces between two spheres with a fixed volume liquid bridge: theory and experiment. Langmuir. 2005;21(24):10992–10997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilamakuri SK, Bhushan B. A comprehensive kinetic meniscus model for prediction of long-term static friction. J Appl Phys. 1999;86(8):4649–4656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YP. Physical mechanics of surfaces and interfaces. Beijing: Science Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mate CM. Application of disjoining and capillary pressure to liquid lubricant films in magnetic recording. J Appl Phys. 1992;72(7):3084–3090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Bhushan B. Tribological performance of magnetic thin-film glass disks: its relation to surface roughness and lubricant structure and its thickness. Wear. 1995;190(1):60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletzke GF, Ted Davis H, Scriven LE. How liquids spread on solids. Chem Eng Commun. 1987;55(1–6):41–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T-D, Gao J, Szoszkiewicz R, et al. Structured and viscous water in subnanometer gaps. Phys Rev B. 2007;75(11):115415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major RC, Houston JE, McGrath MJ, et al. Viscous water meniscus under nanoconfinement. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96(17):177803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feibelman PJ. Effect of high-viscosity interphases on drainage between hydrophilic surfaces. Langmuir. 2004;20(4):1239–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay DB, Kim SH. Evolution of the adsorbed water layer structure on silicon oxide at room temperature. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(35):16760–16763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar