The effect of smear layer thickness on bonding strength to dentin of restorative glass-ionomer cements

References

• Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(Suppl 1):31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Hipolito V, Rodrigues FP, Piveta FB, et al. Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Richter B. A practice-based evaluation of the handling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material. Int Dent J. 2006;56(3):142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifacio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(6):471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie N, Hickel R, Valceanu AS, et al. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, et al. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, et al. Clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in extended size class II cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):685–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners. J Dent. 2000;28(5):361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, et al. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:153–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook NB, Feitosa SA, Patel A, et al. Bonding ability of paste-paste glass ionomer systems to tooth structure: in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):304–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hibridization of dental hard tissues. London: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdan MH, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, et al. Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives. J Dent. 2013;41(10):861–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Sai K, et al. Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2018;34(2):246–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(6):471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latta MA, Radniecki SM. Bond strength of self-adhesive restorative materials affected by smear layer thickness but not dentin desiccation. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuammar MF, Schulman A, Salama FS. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;25(3):221–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Nicolo R, Shintome LK, Myaki SI, et al. Bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement to primary dentin after cutting with different bur types and dentin conditioning. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(5):459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkaya H, Arslan S. A two-year clinical comparison of three different restorative materials in class II cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):E32–E42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes PM, Wendt SL, Jr., Retief DH, et al. Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. Dent Mater. 1990;6(3):204–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000;79(2):709–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigao J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e24–e37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadas M, Demirbuga S. Influence of a short-time antioxidant application on the dentin bond strength after intracoronal bleaching. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(10):1720–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila WM, Hesse D, Bonifacio CC. Surface conditioning prior to the application of glass-ionomer cement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(5):391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res. 2007;86(7):656–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshika S, De Munck J, Sano H, et al. Effect of conditioning and aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LC, Nunes MC, Dibb RG, et al. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewlett ER, Caputo AA, Wrobel DC. Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment of dentin with polyacrylic acid. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(6):767–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshika S, Ting S, Ahmed Z, et al. Effect of conditioning and 1 year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin . Dent Mater. 2021;37(1):106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton DG, Haveman CW. Dentin surface treatment and bond strength of glass ionomers. Am J Dent. 1994;7(1):47–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardoso MV, Delme KI, Mine A, et al. Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mechanism of resin-modified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin. J Dent. 2010;38(11):921–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira PN, Yamada T, Tei R, et al. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent. 1997;10:128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Dent Res. 1998;77(9):1749–1759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Snauwaert J, et al. A novel approach to AFM characterization of adhesive tooth-biomaterial interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47(1):85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Sidhu SK, Watson TF, et al. Water-dependent interfacial transition zone in resin-modified glass-ionomer cement/dentin interfaces. J Dent Res. 2004;83(8):644–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations–a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2002;18(4):295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu SK, Pilecki P, Cheng PC, Watson TF. The morphology and stability of resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive at the dentin/resin-based composite interface. Am J Dent. 2002;15:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao C, Ahmed MH, Okazaki Y, et al. Bonding efficacy of a new self-adhesive restorative onto flat dentin vs Class-I cavity-bottom dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, et al. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):758–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 29022. Dentistry-adhesion-notched-edge shear bondstrength test. 1st ed. Geneva (Switzerland): InternationalOrganization for Standardization; 2013. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4:283–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar