Shear performance of timber-GFRP double-lap adhesive joints for civil engineering applications

References

• Stazi F, Giampaoli M, Nisi L, et al. Mechanical performance reduction of GFRP specimens with polyester matrix exposed to continuous condensation. Compos B. 2016;99:330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh H-S, Sim J. Interface debonding failure in beams strengthened with externally bonded GFRP. Compos Interfaces. 2004;11:25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paygozar B, Dizaji SA, da Silva LFM. Bonding dissimilar materials via adhesively bonded spot-welded joints: cohesive zone model technique. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34:2352–2363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godat A, Légeron F, Gagné V, et al. Use of FRP pultruded members for electricity transmission towers. Compos Struct. 2013;105:408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollaway LC. A review of the present and future utilisation of FRP composites in the civil infrastructure with reference to their important in-service properties. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24:2419–2445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Bai Y. Web crippling behaviour of pultruded glass fibre reinforced polymer sections. Compos Struct. 2014;108:789–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T. Recent all-composite and hybrid fibre-reinforced polymer bridges and buildings. Prog Struct Eng Mater. 2001;3:132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Terlizzi P, Alderucci V, Munafò T. An innovative window with an invisible frame: from the applied research to the industrial production. Tema Technol Eng Mater Archit. 2017;3:61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Terlizzi V, Alderucci T, Munafò P. Facciata continua in pultruso: verifica tecnologica e prestazionale. In: EdicomEdizioni, editor. Colloqui.AT.e 2017. Monfalcone: EdicomEdizioni; 2017. p. 98–99.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Bai Y, Qi Y, et al. Post-fire mechanical performance of modular GFRP multicellular slabs with prefabricated fire resistant panels. Compos B Eng. 2018;143:55–67.,.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Karmoty HZ. Thermal protection of reinforced concrete columns strengthened by GFRP laminates (experimental and theoretical study). HBRC J. 2012;8:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey GJ. Testing of pultruded glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials and structures. In: Bai J, editor. Advanced fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for structural applications. Burlington: Elsevier, 2013; p. 440–508.
   Google Scholar
• Giampaoli M, Terlizzi V, Rossi M, et al. Mechanical performances of GFRP-steel specimens bonded with different epoxy adhesives, before and after the aging treatments. Compos Struct. 2017;171:145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Marchione F. Stress distribution in double-lap adhesive joints: effect of adherend reinforcement layer. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;105:102780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh MN, Saeedifar M, Zarouchas D, et al. Stress analysis of double-lap bi-material joints bonded with thick adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;97:102480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buell TW, Saadatmanesh H. Strengthening timber bridge beams using carbon fiber. J Struct Eng. 2005;131:173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober K-U, Harte AM, Kliger R, et al. FRP reinforcement of timber structures. Constr Build Mater. 2015;97:106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando D, Frangi A, Kobel P. Behaviour of basalt fibre reinforced polymer strengthened timber laminates under tensile loading. Eng Struct. 2016;117:437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert BP, Underhill ID, Fernando D, et al. Structural solutions to produce long timber veneer based composite hollow sections. Constr Build Mater. 2017;139:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theakston FH. A feasibility study for strengthening timber beams with fiberglass. Can Agric Eng. 1965;7:17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery GM, Harte AM. Low-grade glued laminated timber reinforced with FRP plate. Compos B Eng. 2011;42:724–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Fernando D, Heitzmann MT, et al. GFRP-to-timber bonded joints: adhesive selection. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;94:29–39.,.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione F, Munafò P. Experimental investigation on timber-glass double-lap adhesive joints reinforced with nylon fabric. Constr Build Mater. 2021;275:122152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler JG, Frihart CR. Assessment of increased wet wood bonding for epoxy-bonded samples using a melamine-urea-formaldehyde priming agent. Wood Adhes. 2005;2006:99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Munafo P. Frame for windows, doors and external perimeter panels made with profiles joined with structural adhesives – double glazing with spacer joined with structural adhesives. 1020000023128; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• A. D904-99, ASTM D904-99:2013. Standard practice for exposure of adhesive specimens to artificial light. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2013. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Marchione F, Munafò P. Experimental strength evaluation of glass/aluminum double-lap adhesive joints. J Build Eng. 2020;30:101284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione F, Munafò P. Effect of thermal aging on the mechanical performance of timber-timber single-lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;108:102883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D3528-16. Standard test method for strength properties of double lap shear adhesive joints by tension loading. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 6270-2. Paints and varnishes — determination of resistance to humidity — part 2: procedure for exposing test specimens in condensation water atmospheres. 2005. https://www.iso.org/standard/32219.html
   Google Scholar
• ISO 4587:2003. Adhesives — determination of tensile lap-shear strength of rigid-to-rigid bonded assemblies. 2003. https://www.iso.org/standard/34852.html
   Google Scholar
• Asif M. Sustainability of timber, wood and bamboo in construction. In: Khatib JM, editor. Sustainability of construction materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009. p. 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal M, Gogoi G, Dutta N, et al. Development of biobased wood polymer nanocomposites: industrial applications, market, and future trends. In: Hussain CM, editor. Handbook of Polymer Nanocomposites for Industrial Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. p. 587–615.
   Google Scholar
• Vick CB. Adhesive bonding of wood materials, wood handbook – wood as an engineering. 9-1-9–24; 1999. https://www.pdhexpress.com/pdhcourse/pdf/wood_adhesive_bonding_aia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bianche JJ, de Cássia Oliveira Carneiro A, Vital BR, et al. Improving the understanding of wood bonding: behavior of different adhesives on the surface of eucalyptus and pine wood. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;112:102987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione F, Munafò P. Experimental investigation on timber-glass double-lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;106:102818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie EM. Handbook of adhesives and sealants. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2007. https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071479165.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft IA, Comyn J, Mubashar A. Effect of water and mechanical stress on durability. In: da Silva L, Öchsner A, Adams R, editors. Handbook of adhesion technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 879–914.
   Google Scholar
• Dowdy S, Weardon S, Chilko D. Statistics for research. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471477435.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM 5573-99. Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints. Annu B ASTM Stand. 2002;15. 3 pages.
   Google Scholar