Comparative analysis between co-curing and adhesive bonding of glass-epoxy composite laminates and AA5083 aluminium sheets for Maritime application: effect of surface pattern

References

• Sasikumar A, Guerrero JM, Quintanas-Corominas A, et al. Numerical study to understand thermo-mechanical effects on a composite-aluminium hybrid bolted joint. Composite Srtuctures. 2021;275:114396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore V, Di Franco F, Miranda R, et al. Effects of anodizing surface treatment on the mechanical strength of aluminium alloy 5083 to fibre reinforced composites adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;108:102868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese L, Galtieri G, Borsellino C, et al. Durability of hybrid clinch-bonded steel/aluminium joints in salt spray environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87(9-12):3137–3147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SW, Kim HS, Lee DG. Optimum design of the co-cured double lap joint composed of aluminium and carbon epoxy composite. Compos Struct. 2006;75(1–4):289–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart-Smith LJ. In: Reinhart TJ. editor. Composites. Ohio: ASM International; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Vinson JR, Sierakowski RL. The behavior of structures composed of composite materials. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Shin KC, Lee JJ, Lee DG. A study on the lap shear strength of a co-cured single lap joint. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(1):123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WS, Lee JJ. Adhesion strength and fatigue life improvement of co-cured composite/metal lap joints by silane-based interphase formation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2007;21(2):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, He K, Gong Z, et al. The shear strength of composite secondary bonded single-lap joints with different fabrication methods. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34:936–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Liu J, Xia H, et al. Effects of surface treatment and adhesive thickness on the shear strength of precision bonded joints. Polym Test. 2021;94:107063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva LFM, Critchlow GW, Figueiredo MAV. Parametric study of adhesively bonded single lap joints by the Taguchi method. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2008;22(13):1477–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva LFM, Carbas RJC, Critchlow GW, et al. Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2009;29(6):621–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea MD, Da Silva LFM. Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion. 2009;85(4-5):261–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva LFM, Rodrigues TNSS, Figueiredo MAV, et al. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength. The Journal of Adhesion. 2006;82(11):1091–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packham DE. Handbook of adhesion. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zain NM, Ahmad SH, Ali ES. Effect of surface treatments on the durability of green polyurethane adhesive bonded aluminium alloy. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;55:43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora MO, Coban O, Akman E, et al. Comparison of novel surface treatments of Al 2024 alloy for al/cfrp adhesive bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;103:102721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen BB, Olafsen K, Stori A, Vinje K. Silanisation of adhesively bonded aluminium alloy AA6060 with γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane. I. Durability investigation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2002;16(14):1931–1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SY, Choi WJ. Investigation on the effectiveness of silane-based field level surface treatments of aluminium substrates for on-aircraft bonded repairs. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;95:102414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SY, Choi WJ, Choi HS. A review of the recent developments in surface treatment techniques for bonded repair of aluminium airframe structures. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2018;80:16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briskham P, Smith G. Cyclic stress durability testing of lap shear joints exposed to hot-wet conditions. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2000;20(1):33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielecki W, Pawlus P, PerŁowski R, et al. Surface topography effect on strength of lap adhesive joints after mechanical pre-treatment. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;13(2):175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderucci T, Borsellino C, Di Bella G. Effect of surface pattern on strength of structural lightweight bonded joints for marine applications. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;103005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva LFM, Ferreira NMAJ, Richter-Trummer V, et al. Effect of grooves on the strength of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;30(8):735–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D1002-10 2019. Standard test method for apparent shear strength of Single-Lap-Joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-Metal). West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Alderucci T, Rossi M, Chiappini G, et al. Effect of different aging conditions on the shear performance of joints made between GFRP and glass with a UV absorbance coating. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;94:76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsellino C, Calabrese L, Di Bella G, et al. Comparisons of processing and strength properties of two adhesive systems for composite joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2007;27(6):446–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar