Can bovine tooth replace human tooth in laboratory studies? A systematic review

References

• Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(3):273–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca RB, Haiter-Neto F, Carlo HL, et al. Radiodensity and hardness of enamel and dentin of human and bovine teeth, varying bovine teeth age. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53(11):1023–1029.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca RB, Haiter-Neto F, Fernandes-Neto AJ, et al. Radiodensity of enamel and dentin of human, bovine and swine teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49(11):919–922.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field JC, German MJ, Waterhouse PJ. Qualifying the lapped enamel surface: a profilometric, electron microscopic and microhardness study using human, bovine and ovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59(5):455–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teruel J de D, Alcolea A, Hernández A, et al. Comparison of chemical composition of enamel and dentine in human, bovine, porcine and ovine teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(5):768–775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krifka S, Börzsönyi A, Koch A, et al. Bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel—human vs. bovine primary teeth in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):888–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, et al. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares FZM, Follak A, da Rosa LS, et al. Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):1385–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galhano G, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, et al. Comparison of resin push-out strength to root dentin of bovine- and human-teeth. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20(3):332–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turssi CP, Messias DF, Corona SM, et al. Viability of using enamel and dentin from bovine origin as a substitute for human counterparts in an intraoral erosion model. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):332–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rüttermann S, Braun A, Janda R. Shear bond strength and fracture analysis of human vs bovine teeth. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes MB, Sinhoreti MAC, Correr Sobrinho L, et al. Comparative study of the dental substrate used in shear bond strength tests. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003;17(2):171–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, et al. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(5):355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li Y, Wang X, et al. The enamel microstructures of bovine mandibular incisors. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2012;295:1698–1706.
   Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Reprint–preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009;89(9):873–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggion CM. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(4):182–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araújo RM, Araújo MAM, Silva RCSP, et al. Influencia de diferentes meios de armazenamento de dentes extraídos na infiltração marginal. J Bras Clin Estético Odontol. 1999;3:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Resende AM, Gonçalves S. Avaliação da infiltração marginal em dentes humanos e bovinos com dois diferentes sistemas adesivos. Cienc Odontol Bras. 2002;5:38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Abuabara A, Santos A d, Aguiar FHB, et al. Evaluation of microleakage in human, bovine and swine enamels. Braz Oral Res. 2004;18(4):312–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yavuz I, Aydin H, Ulku R, et al. A new method: measurement of microleakage volume using human, dog and bovine permanent teeth. Electron J Biotechnol. 2006;9(1):8–191.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida KGB, Scheibe KGBA, Oliveira AEF, et al. Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(2):92–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simas CMS, Costa EL, Cláudia Maria Coelho Alves FFL, et al. Efeito do substrato e do tipo de adesivo dental na microinfiltração em restaurações de resina composta substrate and type of dental adhesive’s effect on microleakage in composite resin restoration. Odontol Clín-Cient. 2011;10:43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz I, Tumen EC, Kaya CA, et al. The reliability of microleakage studies using dog and bovine primary teeth instead of human primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):42–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spitzer D, ten Bosch JJ. Luminescence quantum yields of sound and carious dental enamel. Calcif Tissue Res. 1977;24(3):249–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodas Duran JE, Panzeri H, Vinha D. Comparative study of the thermoluminescence of x ray-irradiated human and bovine teeth. Rev Fac Odontol Ribeiro Preto. 1984;21(2):122–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YK, Yu B. Measurement of opalescence of tooth enamel. J Dent. 2007;35(8):690–694.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu B, Ahn J-S, Lee Y-K. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(1):57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia ML, Aguiar FHB, Mathias P, et al. The effect of coffee solution on tooth color during home bleaching applications. Am J Dent. 2009;22:175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaz S, Russell RGG, Fleisch H. Isolation of inorganic pyrophosphate from bovine and human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1968;13(6):683–696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG, Sheykholeslam Z. Effect of fluoride on etched human and bovine tooth enamel surfaces as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1972;17(2):271–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fincham AG. Changing amino acid profiles of developing dental enamel in individual human teeth and the comparison of the protein matrix of developing human and bovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1980;25(10):669–674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shu M, Wong L, Miller JH, et al. Development of multi-species consortia biofilms of oral bacteria as an enamel and root caries model system. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(1):27–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu DJ, Darling CL, Lachica MM, et al. Nondestructive assessment of the inhibition of enamel demineralization by CO2 laser treatment using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2008;13(5):054027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Edgar WM. Factors influencing the development of dental erosion in vitro: enamel type, temperature and exposure time. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(8):624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes LAA, Pedro RL, Vieira ASB, et al. Effectiveness of high speed instrument and air abrasion on different dental substrates. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(3):235–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attin T, Wegehaupt F, Gries D, et al. The potential of deciduous and permanent bovine enamel as substitute for deciduous and permanent human enamel: erosion-abrasion experiments. J Dent. 2007;35(10):773–777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fais LMG, Marcelo CC, Silva RHBT, et al. Human teeth versus bovine teeth: Cutting effectiveness of diamond burs. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2013;9:39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hove LH, Young A, Tveit AB. An in vitro study on the effect of TiF(4) treatment against erosion by hydrochloric acid on pellicle-covered enamel. Caries Res. 2007;41(1):80–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khalefa M, Finke C, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Effects of air-polishing devices with different abrasives on bovine primary and second teeth and deciduous human teeth. J Orofac Orthop. 2013;74(5):370–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koulourides T, Chien M. The ICT in situ experimental model in dental research. J Dent Res. 1992;71(3_suppl):822–827.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, et al. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1382–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinelli LAP, Marcelo CC, Pita APG, et al. Photomicrographic study of diamond burs grinding in differents substrates. Cienc Odontol Bras. 2004;7:60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Putt MS, Kleber CJ, Muhler JC. A comparison of the polishing properties of human and bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1980;59(7):1177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobral MA, Lachowski KM, de Rossi W, et al. Effect of Nd:YAG laser and acidulated phosphate fluoride on bovine and human enamel submitted to erosion/abrasion or erosion only: an in vitro preliminary study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(5):709–713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White AJ, Yorath C, Ten Hengel V, et al. Human and bovine enamel erosion under “single-drink conditions”. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(6):604–609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field JC, Waterhouse PJ, German MJ. The early erosive and abrasive challenge: a profilometric, electron microscopic and microhardness study using human, bovine and ovine enamel. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017;25(2):93–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes MB, Yan Z, Consani S, et al. Evaluation of the coefficient of thermal expansion of human and bovine dentin by thermomechanical analysis. Braz Dent. 2012;23:3–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castanho GM, Marques MM, Marques JB, et al. Micromorphological and hardness analyses of human and bovine sclerotic dentin: a comparative study. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(3):274–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collys K, Slop D, Cleymaet R, et al. Load dependency and reliability of microhardness measurements on acid-etched enamel surfaces. Dent Mater. 1992;8(5):332–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donassollo TA, Romano AR, Demarco FF, et al. Surface microhardness evaluation of enamel and dentin in bovine. Rev Odontol Ciência. 2007;22:311–316.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin F, Koulourides T, Pigman W. The characterization of enamel surface demineralization, remineralization, and associated hardness changes in human and bovine material. Arch Oral Biol. 1969;14(12):1407–1417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lippert F, Butler A, Lynch R. Characteristics of methylcellulose acid gel lesions created in human and bovine enamel. Caries Res. 2013;47(1):50–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masuda AK, Quitero MFZ, Espejo-Trung LC, et al. Histological and microhardness evaluation of early artificial carious lesions in human and bovine enamel: in vitro study. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2013;16(4):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira BCL, Fernandes PM, Paiva ACJ, et al. Avaliação comparativa da ultraestrutura e propriedades físicas do esmalte bovino, bubalino e humano. Pesq Vet Bras. 2014;34(5):485–490.
   Google Scholar
• Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Levine MJ. Lubrification of human and human and bovine enamel compared in an artificial mouth. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40(11):1063–1072.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rios D, Honório HM, Magalhães AC, et al. Scanning electron microscopic study of the in situ effect of salivary stimulation on erosion and abrasion in human and bovine enamel. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(2):132–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza-Gabriel A, Colucci V, Turssi CP, et al. Microhardness and SEM after CO(2) laser irradiation or fluoride treatment in human and bovine enamel. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73(11):1030–1035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strassler HE, Minah GE, Kula KS. Microbiological and microhardness evaluation of artificial enamel fissures worn intraorally by humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23(1):6–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen WC, Nancollas GH. The kinetics of dissolution of tooth enamel-a constant composition study. J Dent Res. 1986;65(5):663–668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han L, Abu-Bakr N, Okamoto U, et al. Study of the fluoridated adhesive resin cement-fluoride release, fluoride uptake and acid resistance of tooth structures. Dent Mater J. 2001;20(1):114–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levinkind M, Vandernoot TJ, Elliott JC. Electrochemical impedance characterization of human and bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1990;69(12):1806–1811.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Featherstone JD, Mellberg JR. Relative rates of progress of artificial carious lesions in bovine, ovine and human enamel. Caries Res. 1981;15(1):109–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmunds DH, Whittaker DK, Green RM. Suitability of human, bovine, equine, and ovine tooth enamel for studies of artificial bacterial carious lesions. Caries Res. 1988;22(6):327–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meurman JH, Frank RM. Progression and surface ultrastructure of in vitro caused erosive lesions in human and bovine enamel. Caries Res. 1991;25(2):81–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E, Meyer-Lueckel H. Effects of irradiation on in situ remineralization of human and bovine enamel demineralized in vitro. Caries Res. 2006;40(2):130–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch RJM, Ten Cate JM. The effect of lesion characteristics at baseline on subsequent de- and remineralisation behaviour. Caries Res. 2006;40(6):530–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka JLO, Medici Filho E, Salgado JAP, et al. Comparative analysis of human and bovine teeth: radiographic density. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(4):346–351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes MB, Sinhoreti MAC, Gonini Júnior A, et al. Comparative study of tubular diameter and quantity for human and bovine dentin at different depths. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(4):279–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lippert F, Lynch R. Comparison of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness and transverse microradiography for the study of early caries lesion formation in human and bovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59(7):704–710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Teruel-Fernández J de D, Alcolea-Rubio LA, et al. Structural differences in enamel and dentin in human, bovine, porcine, and ovine teeth. Ann Anat. 2018;218:7–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Carvalho MFF, Leijôto-Lannes ACN, Rodrigues MCN, et al. Viability of Bovine teeth as a substrate in bond strength tests: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(6):471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar