Investigation of the suitability of adhesive tapes for sealing building structures of various surfaces

References

• Domínguez-Amarillo S, Fernández-Agüera J, Campano MÁ, et al. Effect of airtightness on thermal loads in legacy low-income housing. Energies. 2019;12(9):1677. doi: 10.3390/en12091677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillott MC, Loveday DL, White J, et al. Improving the airtightness in an existing UK dwelling: the challenges, the measures and their effectiveness. Build Environ. 2016;95:227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miszczuk A. The level of airtightness in energy-efficient single-family houses in Poland. Procedia Eng. 2016;153:461–466. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.158.
   Google Scholar
• Kalamees T, Alev Ü, Pärnalaas M. Air leakage levels in timber frame building envelope joints. Build Environ. 2017;116:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price S, Baines A, Jennings P. Good practice guide to airtightness; 2020. Available from: https://www.passivhaustrust.org.uk/guidance_detail.php?gId=48
   Google Scholar
• Carrié FR, Jobert R, Leprince V. Contributed report 14. Methods and techniques for airtight buildings. Belgium: Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gombosuren D, Maki T. Prediction of joint shear deformation index of RC beam–column joints. Buildings. 2020;10(10):176. doi: 10.3390/buildings10100176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölsch P, Zirkelbach D, Nusser B. Airflow through lightweight wall assemblies – influence of size and location of leakages. XIII International Conference Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings; Clearwater Beach, FL; 2016. p. 459–484.
   Google Scholar
• Gullbrekken L, Schjøth Bunkholt N, Geving S, et al. Air leakage paths in buildings: typical locations and implications for the air change rate. E3S Web Conf. 2020;172:05010. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202017205010.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Shimizu M, Inaba K, et al. Tack performance of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes under tensile loading. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2013;45:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut RH. Peeling pressure-sensitive adhesive tape from thin elastic strip. J Adhes. 2010;86(7):675–697. doi: 10.1080/00218464.2010.482387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William P, Jacobs V, Dolan JD, et al. An evaluation of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive tapes for bonding wood in building construction applications. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26(10–11):1349–1381. doi: 10.1163/156856111X618254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech Z, Milker R. Development trends in pressure-sensitive adhesive systems. Mater Sci. 2005;23(4):1015–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapari S, Mestry S, Mhaske ST. Developments in pressure-sensitive adhesives: a review. Polym Bull. 2021;78(7):4075–4108. doi: 10.1007/s00289-020-03305-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan I, Poh BT. Natural rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesives: a review. J Polym Environ. 2011;19(3):793–811. doi: 10.1007/s10924-011-0299-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski A, Czech Z, Byczyński Ł. How does the surface free energy influence the tack of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs)? J Coat Technol Res. 2013;10(6):879–885. doi: 10.1007/s11998-013-9522-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Li M, Liu A. A review on mechanical properties of pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2013;41:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EP. Viscoelastic properties of pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Adhes. 1997;60(1–4):233–248. doi: 10.1080/00218469708014421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fufa M, Labonnote N, Frank S, et al. Durability evaluation of adhesive tapes for building applications. Constr Build Mater. 2018;161:528–538. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden S, Maroy K, Steeman M, et al. Tape as a means to ensure air- and watertightness of building joints: experimental assessment. 14th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. Belgium: Ghent University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Linden S, Bossche NV. Airtightness of sealed building joints: comparison of performance before and after artificial ageing. Build Environ. 2020;180:107010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jucienė M, Dobilaitė V. Impact of climatic effects and various surfaces on the tack of adhesive tapes for building & construction. J Build Eng. 2021;42:102825. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Linden S, Van Den Bossche N. Comparative study on the feasibility of watertight face-sealed building joints under simulated wind-driven rain conditions. Build Res Informat. 2021;49(7):748–762. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2021.1888687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletnes M, Frank S. Performance and durability of adhesive tapes for building applications. From product documentation to scientific knowledge (and back again). XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components DBMC; Barcelona; 2020. p. 269–276. doi: 10.23967/dbmc.2020.106.
   Google Scholar
• Akhmedgoraeva AR, Stytsenkov AA, Galimzyanova RY, et al. The influence of thickness and reinforcement on the properties of sealing tapes of incongealable type on the basis of butyl rubber depending on the nature of the glued substrate. Polym Sci Ser D. 2019;12(2):137–141. doi: 10.1134/S1995421219020035.
   Google Scholar
• Antosik AK, Weisbrodt M, Mozelewska K, et al. Impact of environmental conditions on silicone pressure-sensitive adhesives. Polym Bull. 2020;77(12):6625–6639. doi: 10.1007/s00289-019-03099-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Jin K, Shim J, et al. Sustainable triblock copolymers as tunable and degradable pressure sensitive adhesives. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(32):12036–12044. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju YH, Lee H, Han CJ, et al. Pressure-sensitive adhesive with controllable adhesion for fabrication of ultrathin soft devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(36):40794–40801. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c11986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creton C. Pressure-sensitive adhesives: an introductory course. MRS Bull. 2003;28(6):434–439. doi: 10.1557/mrs2003.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 1942. Self-adhesive tapes – measurement of thickness; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• EN ISO 29864. Self-adhesive tapes – measurement of breaking strength and elongation at break; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Moore DR. An introduction to the special issue on peel testing. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2008;28(4–5):153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN ISO 29862. Self-adhesive tapes – determination of peel adhesion properties; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EN ISO 29863. Self-adhesive tapes – measurement of static shear adhesion; 2018.
   Google Scholar