Polymer-based biomaterials and their applications in tissue adhesives

References

• Young JZ, Medawar PB. Fibrin suture of peripheral nerves. Br Med Bull. 1943;1(7):77–77. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070211.
   Google Scholar
• Toriumi DM, Raslan WF, Friedman M, et al. Histotoxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives a comparative study from the division of facial plastic and recon-structive surgery (Drs Toriumi and Tardy), De-partment of Otolaryngology\p = n-\Headand Neck Sur-gery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(5):546–550. doi:10.1001/archotol.1990.01870050046004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ennker J, Ennker IC, Schoon D, et al. The impact of gelatin-resorcinol glue on aortic tissue: a histomorphologic evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20(1):34–43. doi:10.1016/0741-5214(94)90173-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatooles CJ, Braunwald NS. The use of crosslinked gelatin as a tissue adhesive to control hemorrhage from liver and kidney. Surgery. 1966;60:857–861. doi:10.5555/uri:pii:0039606066901589.
   Google Scholar
• Alston SM, Solen KA, Sukavaneshvar S, et al. In vivo efficacy of a new autologous fibrin sealant. J Surg Res. 2008;146(1):143–148. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele J, Herzog J, Mühe E. Fibrin glue protection of digestive anastomoses. Zentralbl Chir. 1978;103(20):1325–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura R, Torri G, Campari A, et al. Experimental suture of the peripheral nerves with “fibrin glue”. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1981;6:407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Zilch H. [Animal experiments on cementing small osteochondral fragments with fibrin glue]. Handchirurgie. 1980;12:71–715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, F., Henning, K., Holle, J., Kovac, W., Rauchenwald, K., Spängler, H. P., & Urlesberger, H. Experiences with a biological adhesive system (fibrin) in the dressing of kidney parenchymal wounds (animal experiment and 1st clinical experiences). Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 1977;102(20):1235–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney AS, Pathak CP, Hubbell JA. Bioerodible hydrogels based on photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly (α-hydroxy acid) diacrylate macromers. Macromolecules. 1993;26(4):581–587. doi:10.1021/ma00056a005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Patents. Patents adhesive sealant composition. US 5583114A. 10 December, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patents. Patents adhesive composition and method. US 5385606A. 31 January 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Holowka EP, Bhatia SK. Drug delivery: materials design and clinical perspective. Springer, US. 2014. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1998-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mattamal GJ. U.S. FDA perspective on the regulation of cyanoacrylate polymer tissue adhesives in clinical applications. Mater Sci Forum. 2007;539–543:692–697. doi:10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.539-543.692.
   Google Scholar
• The Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves nation’s first commercial surgical glue. Los Angeles Times. 2021; 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• TISSEEL. [Fibrin Sealant] for Surgical Care | Baxter. n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagat V, Becker ML. Degradable adhesives for surgery and tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(10):3009–3039. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas KS, Saha SP. Comparison of hemostatic agents used in vascular surgery. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(12):1663–1672. doi:10.1517/14712598.2013.848193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott MK, Chen T, Williams CM, et al. Mechanical properties of biomimetic tissue adhesive based on the microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed crosslinking of gelatin. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(4):1270–1279. doi:10.1021/bm034529a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitton R, Bianco-Peled H. Novel biomimetic adhesives based on algae glue. Macromol Biosci. 2008;8(5):393–400. doi:10.1002/mabi.200700239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C, et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(7):2307–2312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0712117105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spotnitz WD. Fibrin sealant: the only approved hemostat, sealant, and adhesive—a laboratory and clinical perspective. ISRN Surg. 2014;(2014):203943–203928. doi:10.1155/2014/203943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genyk Y, Kato T, Pomposelli JJ, et al. Fibrin sealant patch (tachosil) vs oxidized regenerated cellulose patch (surgicel original) for the secondary treatment of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(3):261–268. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. EVARREST (fibrin sealant patch). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. n.d. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/approved-blood-products/evarrest-fibrin-sealant-patch.
   Google Scholar
• Rathi S, Saka R, Domb AJ, et al. Protein-based bioadhesives and bioglues. Polym Adv Tech. 2019;30(2):217–234. doi:10.1002/pat.4465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(7):603–632. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mati-Baouche N, Elchinger PH, De Baynast H, et al. Chitosan as an adhesive. Eur Polym J. 2014;60:198–212. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann B, Volkmer E, Kokott A, et al. Characterisation of a new bioadhesive system based on polysaccharides with the potential to be used as bone glue. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(10):2001–2009. doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3782-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan B, Soman D, Payanam U, et al. A novel injectable tissue adhesive based on oxidized dextran and chitosan. Acta Biomater. 2017;53:343–354. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles D. KelmanDale P. DeVore G. Patents collagen-based adhesives and sealants and methods of preparation and use thereof. 15 June 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, et al. Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1583–1594. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology transfer: from bench to Market - University of Alberta. n.d. https://sites.ualberta.ca/∼csps/JPPS3(1)/SympBook00.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hong YM, Loughlin KR. The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology. J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2367–2374. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham H, Padilla J, Nguyen K, et al. Comparison of nerve repair techniques: suture vs. avitene-polyglycolic acid tube. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1991;7(1):31–36. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1006762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Smith LA, Hu J, et al. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(12):2252–2258. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summary of Safety and Effectiveness CryoLife, Inc. BioGlue ® surgical adhesive indications for use contraindications, warnings and precautions. 2001; 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Applications of tissue adhesives in anterior segment surgery. n.d. https://crstoday.com/wp-content/themes/crst/assets/downloads/CRST0909_14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dare EV, Griffith M, Poitras P, et al. Fibrin sealants from fresh or fresh/frozen plasma as scaffolds forin vitroarticular cartilage regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(8):2285–2297. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasso G, Piancone F, Bonifazi R, et al. Prospective, randomized clinical trial of the FLOSEAL matrix sealant in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1520–1526. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oz MC, Cosgrove DM, Badduke BR, et al. Controlled clinical trial of a novel hemostatic agent in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(5):1376–1382. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01194-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensard DD, Beauchamp KM, Hurt RT, et al. Encyclopedia of intensive care medicine. 2012. p. 977–977. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00418-6_3122.
   Google Scholar
• Heher P, Ferguson J, Redl H, et al. An overview of surgical sealant devices: current approaches and future trends. Expert Rev Med Devices. 15(10):747–755. 15 (2018) 747–755. doi:10.1080/17434440.2018.1526672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annabi N, Yue K, Tamayol A, et al. Elastic sealants for surgical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;95(Pt A):27–39. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.05.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wound Healing Market to reach US$35. 065.7 mn by 2025—TMR. n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A. Surgical sealants and high strength adhesives. Mater Today. 2015;18(4):176–177. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masket S, Hovanesian JA, Levenson J, et al. Hydrogel sealant versus sutures to prevent fluid egress after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(12):2057–2066. doi:10.1016/J.JCRS.2014.03.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen B, Barkun A, Carpenter S, et al. Tissue adhesives and fibrin glues. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(3):327–333. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01564-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, et al. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):190–201. doi:10.1001/2013.JAMASURG.33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavafoghi M, Sheikhi A, Tutar R, et al. Engineering tough, injectable, naturally derived, bioadhesive composite hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1–12. doi:10.1002/adhm.201901722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock G, Neurath D, Semple E, et al. Preparation and characterization of human thrombin for use in a fibrin glue. Transfus Med. 2007;17(3):187–191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00717.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premarket approval (PMA). accessdata.fda.gov. n.d. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?ID=P830079.
   Google Scholar
• Trott AT. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives: an advance in wound care. JAMA. 1997;277(19):1559–1560. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540430071037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forooshani PK, Lee BP. Recent approaches in designing bioadhesive materials inspired by mussel adhesive protein. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2017;55(1):9–33. doi:10.1002/POLA.28368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich LA. Future opportunities for bio-based adhesives – advantages beyond renewability. Green Chem. 2019;21(8):1866–1888. doi:10.1039/C8GC03746A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Chen S. Recent advances in tissue adhesives for clinical medicine. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(4):939. doi:10.3390/POLYM12040939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble C, Smulders N, Lewis R, et al. Controlled peel testing of a model tissue for diseased aorta. J Biomech. 2016;49(15):3667–3675. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez M, Kang MH, Kim SM, et al. Hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) dual coating on magnesium alloy under deformation for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(2):34. doi:10.1007/s10856-015-5643-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Ge L, Mueller A, et al. Twisting electrospun nanofiber fine strips into functional sutures for sustained co-delivery of gentamicin and silver. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(4):1435–1445. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2017.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annabi N, Zhang Y-N, Assmann A, et al. Engineering a highly elastic human protein–based sealant for surgical applications. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(410):eaai7466. doi:10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.AAI7466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Wang Y, Miao Y, et al. Hydrogen bonds autonomously powered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels with super-elasticity, self-heal and underwater self-adhesion for sutureless skin and stomach surgery and E-skin. Biomaterials. 2018;171:83–96. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Han Y, Cui M, et al. ZnO nanoparticles as an antimicrobial tissue adhesive for skin wound closure. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5(23):4535–4541. doi:10.1039/c7tb00664k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu MM, Bai J, Shao D, et al. Antibacterial and biodegradable tissue nano-adhesives for rapid wound closure. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:5849–5863. doi:10.2147/IJN.S177109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Q, Chen C, Jiang Y, et al. Engineering an adhesive based on photosensitive polymer hydrogels and silver nanoparticles for wound healing. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(26):5756–5764. doi:10.1039/d0tb00726a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Z, Zhang KR, Gao HL, et al. Activating proper inflammation for wound-healing acceleration via mesoporous silica nanoparticle tissue adhesive. Nano Res. 2020;13(2):373–379. doi:10.1007/s12274-020-2619-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh B, Dhaliwal HK, Portillo-Lara R, et al. Local immunomodulation using an adhesive hydrogel loaded with miRNA-Laden nanoparticles promotes wound healing. Small. 2019;15(36):e1902232. doi:10.1002/smll.201902232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin K, Choi JW, Ko G, et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles as a tissue adhesive and an injectable marker for image-guided procedures. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15807. doi:10.1038/ncomms15807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakinoki S, Taguchi T, Saito H, et al. Injectable in situ forming drug delivery system for cancer chemotherapy using a novel tissue adhesive: characterization and in vitro evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2007;66(3):383–390. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Shi X, Zhao F, et al. An injectable and tumor-specific responsive hydrogel with tissue-adhesive and nanomedicine-releasing abilities for precise locoregional chemotherapy. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:123–136. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang J, Chen M, et al. A bioadhesive nanoparticle-hydrogel hybrid system for localized antimicrobial drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(28):18367–18374. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b04858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee W, Selvaduray G, Hawkins B. Characterization of silver nanoparticle-infused tissue adhesive for ophthalmic use. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;55:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saberi J, Ansari M, Ebrahimi Hoseinzadeh B, et al. Chitosan-polyacrylic acid hybrid nanoparticles as novel tissue adhesive: synthesis and characterization. Fibers Polym. 2018;19(12):2458–2464. doi:10.1007/s12221-018-8762-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrabi SM, Majumder S, Gupta KC, et al. Dextran based amphiphilic nano-hybrid hydrogel system incorporated with curcumin and cerium oxide nanoparticles for wound healing. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;195:111263. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Yao W, Tian M, et al. Mussel-inspired degradable antibacterial polydopamine/silica nanoparticle for rapid hemostasis. Biomaterials. 2018;179:83–95. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arno MC, Inam M, Weems AC, et al. Exploiting the role of nanoparticle shape in enhancing hydrogel adhesive and mechanical properties. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1420. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15206-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Peng Y, Yang C, et al. Silica nanoparticles as adhesives for biological tissues? Re-examining the effect of particles size, particle shape, and the unexpected role of base. Part Part Syst Charact. 2017;34(12):1–7. doi:10.1002/ppsc.201700286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scognamiglio F, Travan A, Turco G, et al. Adhesive coatings based on melanin-like nanoparticles for surgical membranes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;155:553–559. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matter MT, Starsich F, Galli M, et al. Developing a tissue glue by engineering the adhesive and hemostatic properties of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2017;9(24):8418–8426. doi:10.1039/c7nr01176h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey N, Hakamivala A, Xu C, et al. Biodegradable nanoparticles enhanced adhesiveness of mussel-like hydrogels at tissue interface. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1–9. doi:10.1002/adhm.201701069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan D, Xing W, Jiang L, et al. Plant-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on Ag-Lignin nanoparticles-triggered dynamic redox catechol chemistry. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1487. 10 doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09351-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong J, Zhao J, Levy GK, et al. Functionalisation of a heat-derived and bio-inert albumin hydrogel with extracellular matrix by air plasma treatment. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12429. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69301-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong J, Zhao J, Justin AW, et al. Albumin-based hydrogels for regenerative engineering and cell transplantation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116(12):3457–3468. doi:10.1002/BIT.27167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ma X, Dong Q, et al. Self-healing of thermally-induced, biocompatible and biodegradable protein hydrogel. RSC Adv. 2016;6(61):56183–56192. doi:10.1039/C6RA11239K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despoudi K, Mantzoros I, Ioannidis O, et al. Effects of albumin/glutaraldehyde glue on healing of colonic anastomosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(31):5680–5691. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Peck Y, Iqbal J, et al. A novel DOPA-albumin based tissue adhesive for internal medical applications. Biomaterials. 2017;147:99–115. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi H, Sekine T, Nakamura T, et al. In vivo evaluation of a new sealant material on a rat lung air leak model—Kobayashi. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(6):658–665. doi:10.1002/jbm.1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller C. Reduction of intraoperative air leaks with Progel in pulmonary resection: a comprehensive review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8(1):90. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Gao L, Peng J, et al. Bioglass activated albumin hydrogels for wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1–13. doi:10.1002/adhm.201800144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan M. Fibrin glue. Blood Rev. 1991;5(4):240–244. doi:10.1016/0268-960X(91)90015-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidman LJ, Eger EI, Kharasch ED, et al. Safety of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with chronically impaired renal function is not proven. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):752–754. doi:10.1097/00000542-200309000-00035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuttil RW. A comparison of antifibrinolytic agents used in hemostatic fibrin sealants. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(6):1021–1028. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katkhouda N, Hurwitz M, Gugenheim J, et al. Laparoscopic management of benign solid and cystic lesions of the liver. Ann Surg. 1999;229(4):460–466. doi:10.1097/00000658-199904000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marczell A. The use of tissucol (tisseel) in pancreatic surgery. In: Schlag G, Redl H, editors. Fibrin sealant in operative medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Scognamiglio F, Travan A, Rustighi I, et al. Adhesive and sealant interfaces for general surgery applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016;104(3):626–639. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon S, De Boer MT, Papacharalabous EN, et al. Fibrin sealant (Evicel® [quixil®/crossealTM]): a review of its use as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery. Drugs. 2011;71(14):1893–1915. doi:10.2165/11207700-000000000-00000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph T, Adeosun A, Paes T, et al. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of TachoComb H patches in controlling PTFE suture-hole bleeding. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(5):549–552. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A safety and efficacy study comparing fibrocaps and tachosil in hepatic surgery – full text view. ClinicalTrials.gov. n.d. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02284256
   Google Scholar
• Azadani AN, Matthews PB, Ge L, et al. Mechanical properties of surgical glues used in aortic root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(4):1154–1160. doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2008.12.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljuboury A. Plasma fibrin/fibrinogen as tissucol adhesive material in periodontal surgery: part 1, hemostasis and flap adhesion. Journal of International Pharmaceutical Research. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• De Carvalho MVH, Marchi E, Lourenço EA. Comparison of arterial repair through the suture, suture with fibrin or cyanoacrylate adhesive in ex-vivo porcine aortic segment. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;32(6):487–491. doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hushmand Shahrifi B, Mohammadi M, Manoochehri M, et al. Mechanical and biological properties of polycaprolactone/fibrin nanocomposite adhesive produced by electrospinning method. Bull Mater Sci. 2020;43(1):135. doi:10.1007/s12034-020-02111-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori F, Landi A, Marotta N, et al. Comparative analysis about efficacy, security, and manageability of gelified hemostatic matrix in bleeding control during thoracic and lumbar spine surgery: FLOSEAL versus Surgiflo. Global Spine J. 2015;5(1_suppl):s-0035-1554306–s-0035-1554306. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554306.
   Google Scholar
• Chung C, Lampe KJ, Heilshorn SC. Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride as a covalent cross-linking agent for cell encapsulation within protein-based hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(12):3912–3916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LX, Coulombe M, Barthelat F, et al. Investigation of surgical adhesives for vocal fold wound closure. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(9):2139–2146. doi:10.1002/LARY.27769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong MJ, Carnahan MA, D’Alessio K, et al. Preclinical characterization and safety of a novel hydrogel for augmenting dural repair. Mater Res Express. 2015;2(9):095401. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/2/9/095401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann A, Vegh A, Ghasemi-Rad M, et al. A highly adhesive and naturally derived sealant. Biomaterials. 2017;140:115–127. doi:10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2017.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece TB, Maxey TS, Kron IL. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2 Suppl):40S–44S. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00742-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman WC, Sherman R, Boyce S, et al. A novel collagen-based composite offers effective hemostasis for multiple surgical indications: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2001;129:445–450. doi:10.1067/msy.2001.112365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farndale RW, Sixma JJ, Barnes MJ, et al. The role of collagen in thrombosis and hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(4):561–573. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00665.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck CA, Simman R. Modern collagen wound dressings: function and purpose. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec. 2010;2(3):50–54. doi:10.1016/j.jcws.2010.12.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doillon CJ, Whyne CF, Brandwein S, et al. Collagen‐based wound dressings: control of the pore structure and morphology. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986;20(8):1219–1228. doi:10.1002/jbm.820200811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Saito H, Uchida Y, et al. Bonding of soft tissues using a novel tissue adhesive consisting of a citric acid derivative and collagen. Mater Sci Eng C. 2004;24(6–8):775–780. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi T, Saito H, Aoki H, et al. Biocompatible high-strength glue consisting of citric acid derivative and collagen. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26(1):9–13. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2005.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik SH, Kim JH, Cho HH, et al. Development and analysis of a collagen-based hemostatic adhesive. J Surg Res. 2010;164(2):e221–e228. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spotnitz WD, Burks S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion. 2008;48(7):1502–1516. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01703.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonchek LI, Braunwald NS. Experimental evaluation of a cross-linked gelatin adhesive in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg. 1967;165(3):420–424. doi:10.1097/00000658-196703000-00013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albes JM, Krettek C, Hausen B, et al. Biophysical properties of the gelatin-resorcinformaldehyde/glutaraldehyde adhesive. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(4):910–915. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(93)90354-K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomori H, Horio H, Morinaga S, et al. Gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde glue for sealing pulmonary air leaks during thoracoscopic operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(1):212–216. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01184-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh M, Yang J. Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(3):271–288. doi:10.1002/mabi.201200332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Chen Y, Zheng Z, et al. Mussel-inspired biocompatible PAADOPA/PAAm hydrogel adhesive for amoxicillin delivery. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2020;59(30):13556–13563. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuk H, Varela CE, Nabzdyk CS, et al. Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices. Nature. 2019;575(7781):169–174. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1710-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Lou K, Cao J, et al. Interaction of a hydrophobic-functionalized PAMAM dendrimer with bovine serum albumin: thermodynamic and structural changes. Langmuir. 2014;30(19):5536–5544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda S, Iwata H, Se N, et al. Bioadhesion of gelatin films crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45(1):20–27. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199904)45:1<20::aid-jbm3>3.0.co;2-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono K, Ishihara M, Ozeki Y, et al. Experimental evaluation of photocrosslinkable chitosan as a biologic adhesive with surgical applications. Surgery. 2001;130(5):844–850. doi:10.1067/msy.2001.117197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang J, Bi S, Kong T, et al. Mechanically and functionally strengthened tissue adhesive of chitin whisker complexed chitosan/dextran derivatives based hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;237:116138. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhi TT, Minh HH, Minh T, et al. Optimization and characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone coated with gelatin-silver nanoparticles for wound healing application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;91:318–329. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Lee J, Huh KM, et al. Toxicity-attenuated glycol chitosan adhesive inspired by mussel adhesion mechanisms. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1–8. doi:10.1002/adhm.201900275.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia SK, Arthur SD, Chenault HK, et al. Interactions of polysaccharide-based tissue adhesives with clinically relevant fibroblast and macrophage cell lines. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29(11):1645–1649. doi:10.1007/s10529-007-9465-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenault HK, Bhatia SK, Dimaio WG, et al. Sealing and healing of clear corneal incisions with an improved dextran aldehyde-PEG amine tissue adhesive. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(11):997–1004. doi:10.3109/02713683.2011.606590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz P, Bürger F, Wegewitz L, et al. Preparation techniques of thin cyanoacrylate adhesive films for interface analysis. J Adhes. 2020;98(7):963–978. doi:10.1080/00218464.2020.1866557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz P, Gerland S, Wegewitz L, et al. Influence of different processing atmospheres on curing and adhesive strength of cyanoacrylates. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2023;124:103386. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Bré LP, Zhao T, et al. Biomaterials Mussel-inspired hyperbranched poly (amino ester) polymer as strong wet tissue adhesive. Biomaterials. 2014;35(2):711–719. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman M, Gheissari A, Money S, et al. A polymeric sealant inhibits anastomotic suture hole bleeding more rapidly than Gelfoam/thrombinresults of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2002;137(3):326–331; discussion 332. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.3.326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mozet C, Prettin C, Dietze M, et al. Use of FLOSEAL and effects on wound healing and pain in adults undergoing tonsillectomy: randomised comparison versus electrocautery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;269(10):2247–2254. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1904-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsner MG, Maniscalco-Theberge ME, Champion HR. Fibrin glue as a hemostatic agent in hepatic and splenic trauma. J Trauma. 1990;30(7):884–887. doi:10.1097/00005373-199007000-00020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belcher E, Dusmet M, Jordan S, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing bioglue and Vivostat for the control of alveolar air leak. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(1):32–38. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempesta BJ, Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, et al. Aerostasis with human fibrin sealant (EVICEL) in patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Chest. 2007;132(4):661C. doi:10.1378/chest.132.4_MeetingAbstracts.661c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gologorsky RC, Alabaster AL, Ashiku SK, et al. Progel use is not associated with decreased incidence of postoperative air leak after nonanatomic lung surgery. Perm J. 2019;23(2):18–059. doi:10.7812/tpp/18-059.
   Google Scholar
• Akar E, Haberal M, Dikis O. Efficacy of surgical tissue glues and supporters for treatment of prolonged air leaks in bullous emphysema. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30(1):57–61. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2020.01.57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MS, Wood DE, Hawkinson RW, et al. Prospective randomized study evaluating a biodegradable polymeric sealant for sealing intraoperative air leaks that occur during pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(5):1792–1801. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zloto O, Greenbaum E, Fabian ID, et al. Evicel versus Tisseel versus sutures for attaching conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(1):61–65. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong TS, Yee GT, Lim TG, et al. Efficacy and safety of decompressive craniectomy with non-suture Duraplasty in patients with traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0232561. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmaker A, Hasan M, Sharifuzzaman M, et al. Development of natural fiber-supported high-strength autologous fibrin glue from human plasma. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(17):1898–1911. doi:10.1080/01694243.2020.1733382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Han I. Biocompatible hybrid allyl 2-cyanoacrylate and hydroxyapatite mixed for bio-glue. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;31(12):1328–1337. doi:10.1080/01694243.2016.1256632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae SK, Sung T-H, Kim J-D. A soft-tissue gelatin bioadhesive reinforced with a proteinoid. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2002;16(4):361–372. doi:10.1163/156856102760067163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Angileri FF, et al. Gelatin-thrombin hemostatic matrix in neurosurgical procedures: hemostatic effectiveness and economic value of clinical and surgical procedure-related benefits. J Neurosurg Sci. 2020;64(2):158–164. doi: 10.23736/s0390-5616.16.03771-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkens KL, Payner TD, Leipzig TJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating a new hemostatic agent for spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(15):1645–1650. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200108010-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders L, Nagatomi J. Clinical applications of surgical adhesives and sealants. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;42(3–4):271–292. doi:10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2014011676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee S, Pham AM, Pryor SG, et al. Efficacy of crosseal fibrin sealant (human) in rhytidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(1):29–33. doi:10.1001/archfacial.2008.511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han L, Yan L, Wang K, et al. Tough, self-healable and tissue-adhesive hydrogel with tunable multifunctionality. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9(4):e372. doi:10.1038/am.2017.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai C, Zhou Z, Guan Z, et al. A multifunctional metallohydrogel with injectability, self‐healing, and multistimulus‐responsiveness for bioadhesives. Macro Mater Eng. 2018;303(10):1800305. doi:10.1002/mame.201800305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke X, Dong Z, Tang S, et al. A natural polymer based bioadhesive with self-healing behavior and improved antibacterial properties. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(15):4346–4357. doi:10.1039/d0bm00624f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Su Y, Wang C, et al. Injectable tissue-adhesive hydrogel for photothermal/chemodynamic synergistic antibacterial and wound healing promotion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(2):2714–2724. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c19566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar