Is the repair bond strength affected when substrate and repair composite are not of the same kind? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater. 2011;27(2):e20–e27. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, et al. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(12):1476–1484. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent. 2002;27(5):528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF. Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;6:81–87. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S53461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FHO, Ambrosano GMB, et al. Influence of adhesive systems and flowable composite lining on bond strength of class II restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical stresses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;80(1):52–58. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, et al. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(3):246–252. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Koc-Dundar B. Composite–composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28(21):2209–2229. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2014.954659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Reep RL, Kubilis PS, et al. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study. Oper Dent. 1998;23(5):272–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif MO, Catleugh M, Merry A, et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(2):CD005971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005971.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations. J Dent. 2016;54:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations – a practice based study. J Dent. 2017;64:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanzow P, Hoffmann R, Tschammler C, et al. Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(4):1087–1093. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1859-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanzow P, Dieckmann P, Hausdörfer T, et al. Repair restorations: questionnaire survey among dentists in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Swiss Dent J. 2017;127:300–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NHF. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations. Dent Update. 2011;38(3):150–184. doi: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.2.78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Dental Association. American Dental Association Standard No. 27-2022—polymer-based restorative materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701–709. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi A, Consani RL, Sinhoreti MA, et al. Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:447–452. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29590.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(2):601–608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Pekkan G. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite–dentin complex. Oper Dent. 2013;38(1):63–72. doi: 10.2341/11-482-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncada G, Angel P, Fernandez E, et al. Bond strength evaluation of nanohybrid resin-based composite repair. Gen Dent. 2012;60(3):230–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa AB, Silami FD, da Garcia L, et al. Effect of various aging protocols and intermediate agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(2):137–144. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 3): variation by dentist factors. J Dent. 2005;33(10):805–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson NHF, Burke FJ, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int. 1997;28(4):245–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awad MM, Almutairi N, Alhalabi F, et al. Influence of surface conditioning on the repair strength of bioactive restorative material. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2020;18:2280800020926615. doi: 10.1177/2280800020926615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consani RL, Marinho T, Bacchi A, et al. Repair strength in simulated restorations of methacrylate- or silorane-based composite resins. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(4):463–467. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghavam M, Naeemi M, Hashemikamangar SS, et al. Repair bond strength of composite: effect of surface treatment and type of composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(6):e520–e527. doi: 10.4317/jced.54030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Baldini M, et al. Reparability of aged silorane with methacrylate-based resin composite: micro-shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Oper Dent. 2012;37(1):28–36. doi: 10.2341/10-397-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonulol N, Almasifar L, Cabadag OG, et al. Shear bond strength of aged composite restorations repaired with a universal injectable composite. Eur J Ther. 2019;25(4):273–278. doi: 10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovas S, Hickel R, Ilie N. How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(6):915–922. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0473-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin Karaarslan E, Ozsevik AS, Cebe MA, et al. Bond strength of repaired composite resins: surface treatments, adhesive systems, and composite type. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(5):520–533. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2015.1111187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouros P, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Spyrou M, et al. Influence of material and surface treatment on composite repair shear bond strength. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(3):251–256. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_37_17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mobarak E, El-Deeb H. Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite. Oper Dent. 2013;38(4):408–418. doi: 10.2341/12-061-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi N, Bahari M, Kimyai S, et al. Effect of an extra hydrophobic resin layer on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. J Dent. 2015;12(12):890–898.
   Google Scholar
• Musa AHA, Nahedh HA. Incremental layer shear bond strength of low-shrinkage resin composites under different bonding conditions. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):603–611. doi: 10.2341/13-104-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negreiros WM, Ayres APA, Willers AE, et al. Effect of argon plasma on repair bond strength using nanofilled and microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(5):713–719. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oglakci B, Arhun N. The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(14):1584–1597. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2019.1609643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Cura C, Brendeke J. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:451–459. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Soft. 2010;36(3):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assink M, Wibbelink CJM. Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: a step-by-step tutorial. Quant Method Psychol. 2016;12(3):154–174. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12(1):55–61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarnieri FDF, Briso ALF, Ramos FdS, et al. Use of auxiliary devices during retreatment of direct resin composite veneers. PLOS One. 2021;16(6):e0252171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz JJ, Zeig T, Attin T, et al. Adhesive application before hydrofluoric acid etching during repair procedure in dentistry? Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;111:102960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K-K, Chen J-H, Wu J-H, et al. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty-four hours. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(3):877–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun MN, Ergin E, Ozgunaltay G. The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(2):282–291. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JVG, Da Paulo JJ, De Cunha RSC, et al. Evaluation of bond strength of self-adhesive resin composite repairs. Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 2021;69:e20210042. doi: 10.1590/1981-863720210004220190180.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Suárez CE, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, et al. Repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite: effect of different adhesive protocols. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):236–241. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Baur A, Dalvai V, et al. Effect of composite age on the repair bond strength after different mechanical surface pretreatments. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(4):365–372. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a44867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornazari IA, Brum RT, Rached RN, et al. Reliability and correlation between microshear and microtensile bond strength tests of composite repairs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103607. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarak EH. Effect of surface roughness and adhesive system on repair potential of silorane-based resin composite. J Adv Res. 2012;3(3):279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2011.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Tveit AB, Rukke HV, et al. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the public dental service in Norway. J Dent. 2016;52:50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria A, Charikleia P, Panagiotis L. Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations. An online survey. Int Dent J. 2017;67(6):351–359. doi: 10.1111/idj.12319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Jagger DC, Newton JT, et al. The opinions of manufacturers of resin-based composite materials towards the repair of failing composite restorations. Prim Dent Care. 2009;16(4):149–153. doi: 10.1308/135576109789389487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awad D, Ilie N. Effect of polymerisation and ageing on the incremental bond strength of ormocer-based dental materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(5):1339–1347. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0831-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Fronczek M, Ranoszek-Soliwoda K, et al. The first step in standardizing an artificial aging protocol for dental composites—evaluation of basic protocols. Molecules. 2022;27(11):3511. doi: 10.3390/molecules27113511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar