Is there a correlation between physical properties and film thickness of dual- and photo-polymerized resin cements and CAD/CAM-dentin micro-tensile bond strength?

References

• Vergano E, Baldi A, Comba A, et al. Bond strength stability of different dual-curing adhesive cements towards CAD-CAM resin nanoceramic: an in vitro study. App Sci. 2021;11:3971.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, et al. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosth. 2004;173:357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Arrais CAG, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, et al. Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent. 2008;36(6):418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes L, Matos I, Miranda M, et al. Dual-curing, self-adhesive resin cement: influence of the polymerization modes on the segree of conversion and microhardness. Mater Res. 2010;13:171–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadros N, Anwar M, El-Askary F. The effect of indirect resin composite material thickness on bond strength and nano-leakage of chemically-cured universal adhesive/dual-cured resin cement system to bovine dentin. EDJ. 2019;65:1883–1894.
   Google Scholar
• Veneziani A. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margin: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur. J Esth Dent. 2010;5:50–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am. J Esthet Dent. 2012;2:86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodont Aesth Dent. 1998;10:47–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarfati A, Tirlet G. Deep margin elevation versus crown lengthening: biological width revisited. Int J Esthet. Dent. 2018;13:334–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaruba M, Göhring T, Wegehaupt F, et al. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odont Scand. 2013;71:317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical prospective and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10:210–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Askary F, Hassanein A, Aboalazm E, et al. A comparison of microtensile bond strength, film thickness, and microhardness of photo-polymerized luting composites. Materials (Basel). 2022;15:3050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendi A, Maleki D, Falahchai M, et al. Composite preheating: a review article. J Dentomaxillofacial Radio Patho Surg. 2019;8:44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Elkaffass A, Eltoukhy R, Elnegoly S, et al. Influence of preheating on mechanical and surface properties of nanofilled resin composites. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(5):e494–e500. doi: 10.4317/jced.56469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen C, Niu L, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine – Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In Vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):282–292. doi: 10.2341/14-055-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimyai S, Bahari M, Abed-Kahnamouei M, et al. Effect of different application strategies of universal adhesive used for immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin with and without aging. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(3):e210–e216. doi: 10.4317/jced.60202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsayed A, Kamel M, El-Askary F. Adhesion strategy and curing mode of a universal adhesive influence the bonding of dual-cured core build-up resin composite to dentin. JAST. 2021;35:53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Perdigao J, Swift Jr E. Universal adhesives. J Esth Rest Dent. 2015;27:331–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rosa W, Piva E, da Silva A. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes L, Terada R, Tsuzuki F, et al. Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials-a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(12):4225–4235. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima M, Yamaguchi S, Mine A, et al. Novel testing method to evaluate the mechanical strength of self-adhesive resin cements with reflection of cement thickness. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(5):1235–1242. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res. 2019;107(6):2121–2131. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 2012;91(4):376–381. doi: 10.1177/0022034512437375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho N, Barbon F, Machado R, et al. Response of composite resins to preheating and the resulting strengthening of luted feldspar ceramic. Dent Mater. 2019;35(10):1430–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Qian Y, Liu H, et al. The effect of preheating on light cured resin composites. J Hard Tiss Biol. 2012;21:273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Korashy D. Post-gel shrinkage strain and degree of conversion of preheated resin composite cured using different regimens. Oper Dent. 2010;35(2):172–179. doi: 10.2341/09-072-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros S, Soliman Z, El-Korashy D, et al. Pre-heating of dual-polymerized resin core foundation system: effect on micro-shear bond strength, degree of conversion and ultimate tensile strength. J Adhes Sci Tech. 2021;35:1880–1894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loumprinis N, Maier E, Belli R, et al. Viscosity and stickiness of dental resin composites at elevated temperatures. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):413–422. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee I, Son H, Um C. Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003;19(4):298–307. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00058-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibraheem R. Rheological properties of resin composite. Biomat J. 2022;1:13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Aleisa K, Habib S, Ansari A, et al. Effect of luting cement film thickness on the pull-out bond strength of endodontic post systems. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(18):3082. doi: 10.3390/polym13183082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel G, Orhan A, Irmak Ö, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the effects of pre-heating and sonic delivery on the internal void formation of bulk-fill composites. Dent Mater J. 2021;31:525–531.
   Google Scholar
• D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, et al. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3):193–198. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falacho R, Marques J, Palma P, et al. Luting indirect restorations with resin cements versus composite resins: effects of preheating and ultrasound energy on film thickness. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;34(4):641–649. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberato W, Silikas N, Watts D, et al. Luting laminate veneers: do resin-composites produce less polymerization stress than resin cements? Dent Mater. 2023;39(12):1190–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbon F, Isolan C, Soares L, et al. A systematic review and meta‑analysis on using preheated resin composites as luting agents for indirect restorations. Clin Oral Invest. 2022;26(4):3383–3393. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04406-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42:800–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Suarez C, da Rosa W, Lund R, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and metal-analysis. JAD. 2019;21:4–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko S, Petschelt A, et al. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self etching adhesives. JAD. 2008;10:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay C, Gul Ozgunaltay G, Yazici A. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24(4):1569–1578. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03052-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamizawa T, Barkmeier W, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e9–e21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz M, Luque I, Hass V, et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41(5):404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud P, Brown M. Effect of universal adhesive etching modes on bond strength to dual-polymerizing composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):657–662. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritake N, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, et al. Effect of active application on bond durability of universal adhesives. Oper Dent. 2019;44(2):188–199. doi: 10.2341/17-384-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Durability of resin–dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater. 2007;23(7):885–892. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, et al. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30(7-8):371–382. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00064-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay F, Pashley D, Suh B, et al. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17(4):271–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2005;84(12):1160–1164. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager S, Balthazard R, Dahoun A, et al. Filler content, surface microhardness, and rheological properties of various flowable resin composites. Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):655–665. doi: 10.2341/16-031-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz C, Bond P, Sy-Muñoz J, et al. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites. Am J Dent. 2008;21(4):215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyab A, Al-Maroof S, Ali H. Effect of preheating on micro-hardness of different composite resins. Ind J Foren Med Toxic. 2020;14:1423–1427.
   Google Scholar
• Elolimy G. Effect of pre-heating on hardness, flexural properties and depth of cure of dental two resin composites. EDJ. 2020;66:1731–1739.
   Google Scholar
• Butterhof M, Ilie N. Mathematical model for assessing true irradiance received by luting materials while curing through modern CAD/CAM resin composites. Dent Mater. 2020;36(8):e255–e265. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer C, Shelton Z, Braga R, et al. Characterization of dimethacrylate polymeric networks: a study of the crosslinked structure formed by monomers used in dental composites. Eur Polym J. 2011;47(2):162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Polikowski A, Krasowski M, et al. The influence of low-molecular-weight monomers (TEGDMA, HDDMA, HEMA) on the properties of selected matrices and composites based on Bis-GMA and UDMA. Mater (Basel). 2022;15:2649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar