Governors and the Bureaucracy: Executive Resources as Sources of Administrative Influence

REFERENCES

• Elling , R. C. 1999 . “ Administering state programs: Performance and politics ” . In Politics in the American states , 7th , Edited by: Gray , V. , Hanson , R. and Jacob , H. 267 – 303 . Washington, DC : CQ Press .
   Google Scholar
• Beyle , T. 1995 . Enhancing executive leadership in the states . State and Local Government Review , 27 ( 1 ) : 18 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper , J. and West , W. 1988 . Presidential power and republican government: The theory and practice of OMB review of agency rules . Journal of Politics , 50 ( 4 ) : 864 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn , R. W. 2000 . State and federal regulatory reform: A comparative analysis . Journal of Legal Studies , 29 ( 2 ) : 873 – 912 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady , D. O. and Simon , K. M. 2002 . Political restraints and bureaucratic discretion: The case of state government rule making . Politics & Policy , 30 ( 4 ) : 646 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• National Association on Administrative Rules Review (NARR) . 1996 . 1996–97 Administrative rules review directory and survey , Lombard, IL : Thomas Legal Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Boerner , R. D. 2002 . Program evaluation in the states . Legisbrief , 10 ( 24 ) : 1 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) . 1999 . Budget processes in the states , Washington, DC : NASBO .
   Google Scholar
• 9. Elling, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley , W. 1996 . “ Accountability battles in state administration. In (ed) ” . In The state of the states , 3rd , Edited by: Van Horn , C. 161 – 178 . Washington, D.C : CQ Press .
   Google Scholar
• Beyle , T. 1995 . Enhancing executive leadership in the states . State and Local Government Review , 27 ( 1 ) : 18 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , P. and Nice , D. C. 1997 . Why governors' staffs grow and grow . Madison Review , 2 : 26 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Council of State Governments . 2000 . The book of the states , Lexington, KY : Council of State Governments .
   Google Scholar
• Bowling , C. J. , Ferguson , M. and Wright , D. S. Governors, legislatures, and the bureaucracy: Executive leadership and the limits of legislative influence . Paper presented at the second annual State Politics and Policy Conference . May 24–25 , Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney , J. L. and Hebert , F. T. 1987 . State agencies and their environments: Examining the impact of important external actors . Journal of Politics , 49 ( 1 ) : 186 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski , M. 2001 . Legislative professionalism and influence on state agencies . Politics & Policy , 29 ( 1 ) : 147 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Elling , R.C. 1992 . Public management in the states , Westport, CT : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• 18. Brudney, & Hebert, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski , M. and Woods , N. D. 2001 . Designing state clean air agencies: Administrative procedures and bureaucratic autonomy . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 11 ( 2 ) : 203 – 221 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong , S. 1998 . Political influence on the bureaucracy: The bureaucracy speaks . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 8 ( 1 ) : 39 – 65 .
   Google Scholar
• Meuller , K. J. 1985 . Explaining variation and change in gubernatorial powers, 1960–1982 . Western Political Quarterly , 38 ( 3 ) : 424 – 431 .
   Google Scholar
• Dometrius , N. D. 1979 . Measuring gubernatorial power . Journal of Politics , 41 ( 2 ) : 589 – 610 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilger , R. J. , Krause , G. A. and Moffett , R. R. 1995 . State legislative professionalism and gubernatorial effectiveness, 1978 – 1991 . Legislative Studies Quarterly , 20 ( 4 ) : 553 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 24. Beyle, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• 25. Hebert et al., 1983.
   Google Scholar
• 26. Brudney & Hebert, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• 27. Elling, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Dometrius , N. D. 2002 . Gubernatorial approval and administrative influence . State Politics and Policy Quarterly , 2 ( 3 ) : 251 – 267 .
   Google Scholar
• Potoski , M. and Woods , N. D. 2001 . Designing state clean air agencies: Administrative procedures and bureaucratic autonomy . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 11 ( 2 ) : 203 – 221 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 30. Bowling et al., 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Abney , G. and Lauth , T. P. 1983 . The governor as chief administrator . Public Administration Review , 43 ( 1 ) : 40 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 32. Hebert et al., 1988.
   Google Scholar
• 33. Dometrius, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• 34. Elling, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• 35. Dometrius, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 36. Beyle, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• 37. Hebert & Brudney, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• 38. Elling, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• 39. Hebert & Brudney, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• 40. Hebert et al., 1983.
   Google Scholar
• 41. Elling, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman , L. and Dometrius , N. D. 1988 . Governors as chief administrators: The linkage between formal powers and informal influence . American Politics Quarterly , 16 ( 2 ) : 157 – 170 .
   Google Scholar
• 43. Dometrius, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 44. Factor analysis of each of the five indicators indicates that each of the indicators is positively related to the latent concept of gubernatorial influence (total budget .72, budgetary priorities .76, policy changes .76, rules and regulations .66, and day-to-day operations .66). Analysis of individual activity areas does not produce substantially different results from those reported below.
   Google Scholar
• Grady , D. O. and Simon , K. M. 2002 . Political restraints and bureaucratic discretion: The case of state government rule making . Politics & Policy , 30 ( 4 ) : 646 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• 46. Beyle, 1999. Beyle's index also includes a component measuring party control of state government. Because we do not feel that it is an indicator of the governor's institutional powers, we have recalculated the index omitting this component. We separately account for party control with our divided government variable.
   Google Scholar
• 47. An alternative would be to use the governor's job approval rating, found in the U.S. Officials Job Approval Ratings (JAR) dataset (e.g., Dometrius 2002). The governors of two of our fifteen states are not included in the dataset, however, so the personal powers index was employed instead.
   Google Scholar
• King , J. D. 2000 . Changes in the professionalism of U.S. state legislatures . Legislative Studies Quarterly , 25 ( 2 ) : 327 – 343 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 49. Agencies classified as staff include general administration, budget and finance, information systems, personnel, planning, and purchasing.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein , D. and O'Halloran , S. 1999 . Delegating powers: A transaction costs politics approach to policy making under separate powers , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Huber , J. D. , Shipan , C. R. and Pfahler , M. 2001 . Legislatures and statutory control of the bureaucracy . American Journal of Political Science , 45 ( 2 ) : 330 – 345 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , W. H. 1993 . Regression standard errors in clustered samples . Stata Technical Bulletin , 13 : 19 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Williams , R. L. 2000 . A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-related data . Biometrics , 56 ( 2 ) : 645 – 46 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 54. Beyle, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• 55. Elling, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn , R. W. 2000 . State and federal regulatory reform: A comparative analysis . Journal of Legal Studies , 29 ( 2 ) : 873 – 912 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 57. Grady & Simon, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• 58. Potoski & Woods, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Moe , T. M. 1989 . “ The politics of bureaucratic structure ” . In can the government govern? , Edited by: Chubb , J. and Peterson , P. Washington, DC : Brookings. Institution .
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins , M. , Noll , R. G. and Weingast , B. R. 1987 . Administrative procedures as instruments of political control . Journal of Law, Economics and Organization , 3 ( 2 ) : 243 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins , M. , Noll , R. G. and Weingast , B. R. 1989 . Structure and process as solutions to the politicians principal-agency problem . Virginia Law Review , 74 ( 2 ) : 431 – 482 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 62. Bowling, et al., 2002.
   Google Scholar