Unintended Consequences of NPM Drive the “Bureaucracy”

REFERENCES

• Andersson, T., & Tengblad, S. (2009). When complexity meets culture: New public management and the Swedish police. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 6(1/2), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectic view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. (2004). A simple matter of control? NHS hospital nurses and new management. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 317–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, S., & Houlihan, M. (2005). The (mis)representation of customer service. Work, Employment and Society, 19(4), 685–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Holmberg, I., Löwstedt, J., & Brommels, M. (2010). Executive management in radical change—the case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1989). The wonderland of public administration reforms. Organization Studies, 10(4), 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2010). Explaining cross-country differences in performance–related pay in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 577–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsdottir, G. (1999). Förförande idéer—kvalitetssäkring i hälso-och sjukvården. [Seductive ideas—quality assurance in healthcare] (Dissertation). Ekonomihögskolan, Lunds universitet, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbladh, B., Bejerot, E., & Gustafsson, R. Å. (Eds.). (2008). Bortom New Public Management—Institutionell transformation i svensk sjukvård. [Beyond New Public Management: Institutional transformation in Swedish healthcare]. Lund: Academia Adacta AB.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., & Lynn, L. (2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variation on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(3), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1996). Exploring variations in public management reform of the 1980s. In H. Bekke, J. Perry, & T. Toonen (Eds.), Civil service systems in comparative perspective (pp. 268–287). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management. Into the age of the paradox. Journal of Public Administration and Research, 14(3), 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalised organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2008). The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 13–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, D., & Weick, K. (1990.) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osbourne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993) Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2011). Inside the hybrid organization: An organizational level view of responses to conflicting institutional demands. WP DR-11001, ESSEC Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2001). The future of governing—four emerging models (2nd ed.) Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (2003). The role of public administration in governing. In G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 1–11). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, C. (2000/2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, R. S., & Granerud, L. (2011). The search for legitimacy and organizational change: The agency of subordinated actors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(3), 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombach, B. (2007). Marknaden ett sakligt skäl för lönesättning? [Marketing a rational basis for setting salaries]. In L. Andersson-Felé, D. Karlsson, & V. Nilsson (Eds.), Demokratisk styrning och effektiv styrning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• RRV (1998:22). Att verksamhetsanpassa lönepolitiken—En granskning av det lönepolitiska arbetet vid fem myndigheter. [Aligning wage policy—A review of the policy work at five agencies].
   Google Scholar
• Ryen, A. (2004). Kvalitativ intervju—från vetenskapsteori till fältstudier. [Qualitative interviews—from scientific theory to case studies]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, S. (1981). Fatal remedies. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Sjölund, M. (1996). Ny lönepolitik- nu värdestruktur i förvaltningen. [New wage policy—new value structure in management]. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, Årg., 99(4), 390–406.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976). The wealth of nations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1776)
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2007). Intervening in the inevitable: Contesting globalization in a public sector organization. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey, O. (2007 October). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. Political Science and Politics, 40,765–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., Occasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Characteristics of modern bureaucracy. In G. Rooth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society (pp. 956–963). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, E., & Dellve, L. (2009). Contemporary leadership in healthcare organizations: Fragmented or concurrent leadership. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(4), 411–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willmott, H. (1997). Rethinking management and managerial work: Capitalism, control and subjectivity. Human Relations, 50(11), 1329–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar