704
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Addressing the Challenges of Adaptation to Climate Change Policy: Integrating Public Administration and Public Policy Studies

&

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, G. (1996). The new focus on the policy capacity of the federal government. Canadian Public Administration, 39(4), 469–488.
  • British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. (2012). FFESC Closing Conference/Workshop June 11–13, 2012 Report. Retrieved from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/future_forests/council/index.htm#closing_conference
  • Brown, H. C. P. (2009). Climate change and Ontario forests: Prospects for building institutional adaptive capacity. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14, 513–536.
  • Center for Disease Control. (2013). Fact sheet: Improving survey methodology. Division of behavioral surveillance, Atlanta, GA: Author.
  • Colebatch, H. K., & Radin, B. A. (2006). Mapping the work of policy. In H. K. Colebatch (Ed.), The work of policy: An international survey (pp. 217–226). Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
  • de Bruijn, H., & Porter, A. (2004). The education of a technology policy analyst—To process management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(2), 261–274.
  • Dessai, S., Hulme, M., Lempert, R. J., & Pielke, R. Jr. (2009). Climate prediction: A limit to adaptation? In W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, & K. O’Brien (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
  • Dluhy, M. (1981). Policy advice-givers: Advocates? Technicians? Or pragmatists? In M. Dluhy (Ed.), New strategic perspectives on social policy (pp. 202–216). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  • Dror, Y., (1967). Policy analysts: A new professional role in government service. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 197–203.
  • Durning, D., & Osuna, W. (1994). Policy analysts’ roles and value orientations: An empirical investigation using Q methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(4), 629–657.
  • Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7, 46–59.
  • Fussel, H., & Klein, R. (2006). Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution in conceptual thinking. Climate Change, 75(3), 301–329.
  • Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Gleeson, D., Legge, D., O’Neill, D., & Pfeffer, M. (2011). Negotiating tensions in developing organisational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(3), 237–263.
  • Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings In- situation Press.
  • Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In B. Peters & D. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment (pp. 138–172). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Hamburger, P., & Weller, P. (2012). Policy advices and a central agency: The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 363–376.
  • Hicks, R., & Watson, P. (2007). Policy capacity: Strengthening the public service’s support to elected officials. Edmonton, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
  • Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(Spring), 3–19.
  • Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: From ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together.’ Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201–210.
  • Hoppe, R., & Jeliazkova, M. (2006). How policy workers define their job: A Netherlands case study. In H. K. Colebatch (Ed.), The work of policy: An international survey (pp. 35–60). Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Howden, S. M., Soussana, J.-F., Tubiello, F. N., Chhetri, N., Dunlop, M., & Meinke, H. (2007). Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 104, 19691–19696.
  • Howlett, M. (2009a). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.
  • Howlett, M. (2009b). A profile of B.C. provincial policy analysts: Troubleshooters or planners? Canadian Political Science Review, 3(3), 55–68.
  • Howlett, M. (2009c). Policy advice in multi-level governance systems: Sub-national policy analysts and analysis. International Review of Public Administration, 13(3), 1–16.
  • Howlett, M. (2010). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Howlett, M., & Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(3), 225–249.
  • Howlett, M., & Newman, J. (2010). Policy analysis and policy work in federal systems: Policy advice and its contribution to evidence-based policy-making in multi-level governance systems. Policy and Society, 29(3), 123–136.
  • Howlett, M., & Oliphant, S. (2010). Environmental research organizations and climate change policy analytical capacity: An assessment of the Canadian case. Canadian Political Science Review,4(2–3), 18–35.
  • Howlett, M., & Wellstead, A. (2011). Policy analysts in the bureaucracy revisited: The nature of professional policy work in contemporary government. Politics & Policy, 39, 613–633.
  • Howlett, M., & A. Wellstead. (2012a). Policy work in multi-level states: Institutional autonomy and task allocation among Canadian policy analysts. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 757–780.
  • Howlett, M., & Wellstead, A. (2012b). The nature of policy work and policy capacity at the sub-national level: Evidence from Canada’s provinces and territories. Canadian Public Administration, 55(1), 53–68.
  • Jenkins-Smith, H. (1982). Professional poles for policy analysts: A critical assessment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(1), 88–100.
  • Kinder, J. (2010). Science advisory mechanisms in Canada: An institutional analysis. In G. Toner, Le. A. Pal, & M. J. Prince (Eds.), Policy: From ideas to implementation: A book in honour of G. Bruce Doern (pp. 119–141). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Koliba, C., & Gajda, R. (2009). “Communities of practice” as an analytical construct: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 97–135.
  • Kothari, A., McLean, L., & Edwards, N. (2009). Increasing capacity for knowledge translation: Understanding how some researchers engage policy-makers. Health Studies Publications. Paper 8.
  • Laumann, E., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state. Social choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Lemmen, D., Warren, F. J., Lacroix, J., & Bush, E. (2008). From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007 (448 pp.). Ottawa, Canada: Government of Canada.
  • Lim, B., & Spanger-Siegfried, E. (2004). Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindquist, E. (1992). Public managers and policy communities: Learning to meet new challenges. Canadian Public Administration, 35(2), 127–159.
  • Manitoba. Office of the Auditor General [Jon Singleton]. (2001). A review of the policy capacity between departments. Winnipeg, Canada: Queen’s Printer.
  • Mayer, I., Igor, S., Van Daalen, E., & Bots, P. (2004). Perspectives on policy analysis: A framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(1), 169–191.
  • Meltsner. A. (1976) Policy analysts in the bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ontario Executive Research Group. (1999). Investing in policy: Report on other jurisdictions and organizations. Toronto, Canada: Ministry of the Environment.
  • Page, E., & Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy bureaucracy: Governing with a cast of thousands. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Peters, B. G. (1996). The policy capacity of government. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Prince, M. (2007). Soft craft, hard choices, altered context: Reflections on twenty five years of policy advice in Canada. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, & D. Laycock (Eds.), Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 219–237). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Strengthening evidence-based policy in the Australian Federation, Volume 1: Proceedings. Roundtable Proceedings. Canberra, Australia: Author.
  • Radin, B. (1997). Presidential address: The evolution of the policy analysis field: From conversation to conversations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(2), 204–218.
  • Radin, B. A. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Savoie, D. (2003). Strengthening the policy capacity of government. Report to the panel on the role of government. Research Paper Series, 1, 239–290.
  • Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Regression. Biometry. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman and Co, 404–493.
  • Warren, F. J., & Lemmen, D. S. (Eds.). (2014). Canada in a changing climate: Sector perspectives on impacts and adaptation (286 pp). Ottawa,Canada: Government of Canada.
  • Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). The neglect of governance in forest sector vulnerability assessments: Structural-functionalism and “black box” problems in climate change adaptation planning. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 23.
  • Wellstead, A., & Stedman, R. (2010). Policy capacity and incapacity in Canada’s federal government: The intersection of policy analysis and street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 12, 893–910.
  • Wellstead, A., & Stedman, R. (2011). Climate change policy capacity at the sub-national government level. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(5), 461–478.
  • Wellstead, A., Stedman, R., & Howlett, M. (2011). Multi-level policy analytical capacity in Canada: A structural equation model (SEM) study of federal, provincial and territorial policy analysts and analysis. Public Policy and Administration, 26(3), 353–373.
  • Wellstead, A., Stedman, R., & Lindquist, E. (2009). The nature of regional policy work in Canada’s federal public service. Canadian Political Science Review, 3(1), 34–56.
  • Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P. (1998). Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 473–505.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.