Elite Ethics: Comparing Public Values Prioritization Between Administrative Elites and Political Elites

REFERENCES

• Aberbach, J., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1994). Civil servants and policy makers: Neutral or responsive competence. Governance, 7(4), 461–469.
   Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2000). In the web of politics: Three decades of the U.S. federal executive. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Studies, 35(4), 673–676.
   Google Scholar
• Beck Jørgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker, R. (2009). Liaisons dangereuses. Enige beschouwingen over de arbeidsverhoudingen bij de overheid, met name tussen politici en ambtenaren. Leiden: Universiteit van Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T. (2010). A Journey. London, UK: Arrow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomore, T. B. (1964). Elites and society. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. A. P., Hart, P. T., van Twist, M. J. W., & Rosenthal, U. (2012). Openbaar Bestuur. Beleid, organisatie en politiek (8th ed.). Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, G. W. (2010). Decision points. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Domhoff, G. W., & Dye, T. R. (Eds.). (1987). Power elites and organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, T. (2009). The complementarity view: Exploring a continuum in political–administrative relations. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 876–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (2005). Public ethics and the new managerialism: An axiomatic theory. In H. G. Frederickson & R. K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 165–183). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Frissen, P. (2009). Gevaar verplicht. Over de noodzaak van aristocratische politiek. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Van Gennep.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, B. R., & Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2013). Mastering public administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gains, F. (2009). Narratives and dilemmas of local bureaucratic elites: Whitehall at the coal face? Public Administration, 87(1), 50–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart, P. T., & Wille, A. W. (2006). Ministers and top officials in the Dutch core executive: Living together, growing apart? Public Administration, 84(1), 121–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelovac, D., Van der Wal, Z., & Jelovac, A. (2011). Business and government ethics in the “new” and “old” EU. An empirical account of public–private value congruence in Slovenia and The Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klostermann, J. (2003). The social construction of sustainability in Dutch water companies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2008). Political–administrative relations. impact of and puzzles in Aberbach, Putnam, and Rockman, 1981. Governance, 21(3), 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of the Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on government transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, D. (2007). Ethics management for public administrators. Building organizations of integrity. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenkamp, R. (2001). De prijs van het politieke primaat. Wederzijds vertrouwen en loyaliteit in deverhoudingen tussen bewindspersonen en de ambtelijke top. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N. (2010). The government and politics of the European Union (7th ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society [Trattato Di Sosiologia Generale]. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Committed to the public interest? Motivation and behavioural outcomes among local councillors. Public Administration. Advance Online Publication. Retrieved October 3, 2014. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02107.x
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2010). Governmental transparency and secrecy: Linking literature and contemporary debate. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011). Everyday life in British government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., Hart, P. T., & Noordegraaf, M. (2007). Observing government elites. Up close and personal. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the Platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, J. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats. An essay on law and values. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, D. (2008). Superclass. The global power elite and the world they are making. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2000). Traditional flavors? The different sentiments in European and American administrative thought. Administration & Society, 33(2), 220–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(1), 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2014). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and public management. American Review of Public Administration. DOI:10.1177/0275074014525833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, J. A. (1966). Political ambition. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Searing, D. D. (1969). The comparative study of elite socialization. Comparative Social Studies, 1, 471–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, M. (1995). The founders, the constitution, and public administration. Georgetown, Guyana: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., &van der Meer, F. (2011). Public service bargains in Dutch top civil service. Public Policy and Administration, 26(2), 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theakston, K., & Fry, G. K. (1989). Britain’s administrative elite: Permanent secretaries 1900-1986. Public Administration, 67(2), 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, J. H. J., Huberts, L. W. J. C., & Verberk, S. (2002). Het morele gezicht van de overheid: waarden, normen en beleid. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, F. M. (Ed.) (2011). Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2008). Value solidity. Differences, similarities and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2011). The content and context of organizational ethics. Public Administration, 89(2), 644–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2012). Elite Ethiek. Hoe politici en topambtenaren invulling geven aan publieke waarden. Beleid en Maatschappij, 39(3), 258–279.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2013). Mandarins vs. Machiavellians? On differences between work motivations of political and administrative elites. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 749–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., de Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? A comparative empirical study on the differences and similarities between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., Huberts, L. W. J. C., Van den Heuvel, J. H. J., & Kolthoff, E. W. (2006). Central values of government and business: Differences, similarities, and conflicts. Public Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 314–364.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & de Graaf, G. (2013). From galaxy to universe? A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. American Review of Public Administration. DOI:10.1177/0275074013488822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Es, R. (2011). Professionele Ethiek. Morele besluitvorming in organisaties en professies. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rekom, J., van Riel, C. B. M., & Wierenga, B. (2006). A methodology for assessing organizational core values. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 175–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. (1966). Organizational choice: A study of pre-and post-decision processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1, 212–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1919). Politik als beruf. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers. The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1887). The study of public administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, B. (1994). The agenda. Inside the Clinton white house. New York, NY: Simon & Schusler.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, B. (2004). Plan of attack. New York, NY: Simon & Schusler.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, B. (2010). Obama’s wars. New York, NY: Simon & Schusler.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., & Van der Wal, Z. (2014) Rule of morality vs. rule of law? An exploratory survey study of civil servant values in China and The Netherlands. Public Integrity, 16(2), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar