Performance Management in Local Government: The Application of System Dynamics to Promote Data Use

REFERENCES

• Ammons, D. N. (2000). Benchmarking as a performance management tool: Experiences among municipalities in North Carolina. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12, 106–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking process. Public Administration Review, 68, 304–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. F., Rich, E., & MacDonald, R. H. (2009). System dynamics applications to public policy. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 7051–7061). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (1991). Leadership counts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modeling: From an ‘external’ to an ‘internal’ perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2012). Enhancing performance management and sustainable organizational growth through system dynamics modeling. In S. N. Groesser & R. Zeier (Eds.), Systemic management for intelligent organizations: Concepts, model-based approaches, and applications. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Montemaggiore, G. B. (2008). Enhancing strategy design and planning in public utilities through dynamic balanced scorecards: Insights from a project in a city water company. System Dynamics Review, 24, 175–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Winch, G. W. (2005). Unleashing growth potential in “stunted” SMEs: Insights from simulator experiments. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3, 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Winch, G. W. (2009). Supporting value creation in SMEs through capacity building and innovation initiatives: The danger of provoking unsustainable rapid growth. International Journal of Opportunity, Growth and Value Creation, 1, 164–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., Winch, G. W., & Tomaselli, S. (2008). Management simulation as an instrument to aid turning “stunted growth” around in family businesses. Sinergie Journal, 75, 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer, J. P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61, 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, P. K., & Vogt, A. J. (1997). Performance and costa data: Phase I city services. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review, 27, 22–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. (2003). Public management and administration: An introduction (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Im, T., & Lee, S. J. (2012). Does management performance impact citizen satisfaction? American Review of Public Administration, 42, 419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., & Kaplan, R. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (1997). Winston-Salem’s participation in the North Carolina performance measurement project. Government Finance Review, 13, 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., MacDonald, R. H., & Andersen, D. F. (2013). Simulation and managerial decision making: A double loop learning framework. Public Administration Review, 73, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotter, J., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Linard, K., Fleming, C., & Dvorsky, L. (2002). System dynamics as the link between corporate vision and key performance indicators. Paper presented at the 20th System Dynamics International Conference, Palermo, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morecroft, J. (2007). Strategic modeling and business dynamics: A feedback system approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance information use. Administration & Society, 36, 427–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72, 592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, B. (2001). A new language for leveraging scorecard-driven learning. Harvard Business School Publishing, 3, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie-Dunham, J. (2001, July). Informing mental models for strategic decision making with ERPs and the balanced scorecard: A simulation-based experiment. In Proceedings of the 19^th System Dynamics International Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C. (2001). A guide to the North Carolina local government performance measurement project. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C. (2007). A manager’s toolbox. In C. W. Stenberg & S. L. Austin (Eds.), Managing local government services. Washington, DC: ICMA.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., Ammons, D. N., & Roenigk, D. J. (2005). Benchmarking for results. Chapel Hill, NC: School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., & Pizzarella, C. M. (2002). Final report on city services for fiscal year 2000–2001. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Roenigk, D. J. (2012). Final report on city services for fiscal year 2010–2011. Chapel Hill, NC: School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, B. (2013). Telephone interview with the Budget Director of Winston-Salem, North Carolina. April 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (2005, July–August). Designing high-performance organizations. Harvard Business Review, 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sloper, P.L., Linard, K., & Paterson, D. (1999). Towards a dynamic feedback framework for public sector performance management. Paper presented at the 17th International System Dynamics Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (2002). Competitive strategy dynamics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichowsky, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Measuring how administration shapes citizenship: A policy feedback perspective on performance management. Public Administration Review, 68, 908–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar