1,592
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Performance Budgeting in American States: A Framework of Integrating Performance with Budgeting

&

REFERENCES

  • Abney, G., & Lauth, T. P. (1998). The end of executive dominance in state appropriations. Public Administration Review, 58(5), 388–394.
  • Andrews, M. (2004). Authority, acceptance, ability and performance-based budgeting reforms. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 332–344.
  • Bourdeaux, C. (2006). Do legislatures matter in budgetary reform. Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(1), 120–142.
  • Bourdeaux, C., & Chikoto, G. (2008). Legislative influences on performance management reform. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 253–265.
  • Boyle, R. (2010). Performance reporting: Insights from international practice (Managing for Performance and Results Series). Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
  • Caiden, N. (1998). Public service professionalism for performance measurement and evaluation. Public Budgeting & Finance, 18(2), 35.
  • Chi, K. S. (2008). Four strategies to transform state governance ( p. 46). Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • Dean, P. N. (1986). Assessing the performance budgeting experiment in four developing countries. Financial Accountability and Management, 2(1), 1–24.
  • Heckman, A. C. (2012). Desperately seeking management: Understanding management quality and its impact on government performance outcomes under the clean air act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 473–496.
  • Hendrick, R. (2000). Comprehensive management and budgeting reform in local government: The case of Milwaukee. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(3), 312–337.
  • Ho, A. T.-K. (2011). PBB in American local governments: It’s more than a management tool. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 391–401.
  • Hou, Y., Lunsford, R. S., Sides, K. C., & Jones, K. A. (2011). State performance-based budgeting in boom and bust years: An analytical framework and survey of the states. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 370–388.
  • Jordan, M. M., & Hachbart, M. M. (1999). Performance budgeting and performance funding in the states: A status assessment. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19(1), 68–88.
  • Joyce, P. G. (1993). Using performance measures for federal budgeting: Proposals and prospects. Public Budgeting & Finance, 13(4), 3–17.
  • Joyce, P. G. (2003). Linking performance and budgeting: Opportunities in the federal budget process (Managing for Performance and Results Series). Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
  • Joyce, P. G. (2011). The Obama administration and PBB: Building on the legacy of federal performance-informed budgeting? Public Administration Review, 71(3), 356–367.
  • Lee Jr., R. D., & Burns, R. C. (2000). Performance measurement in state budgeting: Advancement and backsliding from 1990 to 1995. Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(Spring), 38–54.
  • Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lu, Y. (2007). Performance budgeting: The perspective of state agencies. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), 1–17.
  • Lu, Y. (2008). Managing the design of performance measures: The role of agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(1), 3–20.
  • Lu, Y. (2011). Individual engagement to collective participation: The dynamics of participation pattern in performance budgeting. Public Budgeting and Finance, 31(2), 79–98.
  • Lu, Y., Willoughby, K., & Arnett, S. (2009). Legislating results: Examining the legal foundations of PBB systems in the states. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(2), 266–287.
  • Lu, Y., Willoughby, K., & Arnett, S. (2011). Performance budgeting in the American states: What’s law got to do with it? State and Local Government Review, 43(2), 79–94.
  • Lu, Y., & Willoughby, K. G. (2012). Performance budgeting in the states: An assessment. IBM The Business of Government, (Fall/Winter), 71–75.
  • Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66–73.
  • Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (2004). Staying the course: The use of performance measurement in state governments. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
  • Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216.
  • Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89.
  • Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2003). Look for the silver lining: When performance-based accountability systems work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 469–490.
  • Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592–602.
  • Robinson, M., & Brumby, J. (2005). Does performance budgeting work? An analytical review of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Sanger, M. (2008). Getting to the roots of change: Performance management and organizational culture. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(4), 621–653.
  • Schick, A. (2001). Getting performance measures to measure up. In D. W. Forsythe (Ed.), Quicker, better, cheaper: Managing performance in American government (pp. 39–60). Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute Press.
  • Stalebrink, O. J., & Frisco, V. (2011). PART in retrospect: An examination of legislators’ attitudes toward PART. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(2), 1–21.
  • United Nations Capital Development Fund. (2006). Achieving results: Performance budgeting in the least developed countries. New York, NY: Author.
  • Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in budgeting: A study of county governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(3), 102–118.
  • Wholey, J. (2006). Quality control: Assessing the accuracy and usefulness of performance measurement system. In H. P. Hatry (Ed.), Performance measurement: Getting results. (pp. 267–286). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
  • Willoughby, K. G., & Melkers, J. E. (2000). Implementing PBB: Conflicting views of success. Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(1), 105–120.
  • Yang, K., & Hsieh, J. Y. (2007). Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle-range model. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 861–879.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.