Unveiling the Features of a Regulatory System: The Institutional Grammar of Tobacco Legislation in Mexico

REFERENCES

• Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying crawford and ostrom’s grammar. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. (2012, April). Evaluating the performance of regulation and regulatory policy. Organization for Economics Co-Operation and Development. Public Governance and Territorial Development Committee. Paper presented at the 6th meeting of the Regulatory Policy Committee, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A grammar of institutions. In Elinor Ostrom ( Ed.), Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. N., & Edwards, F. R. (1974). Measuring the effectiveness of regulation: The case of bank entry regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., Bates, C., Mulgan, G., Aldridge, S., Beales, G., & Heathfield, A. (2004). Personal responsibility and changing behavior: The state of knowledge and its implications for public policy. London, UK: Cabinet Office, Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Joskow, P. L. (2005, September). Incentive regulation in theory and practice: Electricity distribution and transmission networks. Paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Economics Regulation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Khandker, S., Koolwal, G., & Samad, H. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative methods and practices. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1990). The politics of government decision making: Regulatory institutions. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 6(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, D. F., & Korzmeyer, P. (2002). The quest for drug control: Politics and federal policy in a period of increasing substance abuse, 1963–1981. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012, April). A Framework for Regulatory Policy Evaluation. In 6th Meeting of the Regulatory Policy Committee (Paris, 2012). Paris, France: Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, Regulatory Policy Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Crawford, S. (2005). Classifying rules. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and comon pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1999). A behavioral approach to the study of intergovernmental relations. In M. D. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2012, April). The economic impact of regulatory policy: A literature review of quantitative evidence. Organization for Economics Co-Operation and Development. Public Governance and Territorial Development Committee. Paper presented at the 6th meeting of the Regulatory Policy Committee, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward and integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter, A., & Theesfeld, I. (2010). The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms and rules. Rationality and Society, 22(4), 445–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J., & Friedland, C. (1962). What can regulators regulate? The case of electricity. Journal of Law and Economics, 5(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedillo, E., & Wheeler, H. (Eds.). (2012). Rethinking the “War on Drugs” Through the US–Mexico Prism (eBook). New Haven, CT: Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
   Google Scholar