Does User Co-Production of Public Service Delivery Increase Satisfaction and Trust? Evidence From a Vignette Experiment

REFERENCES

• Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “Exit” and “Voice.” World Development, 32(3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. M., Gleason, J. M., & Johnston, S. (1976). Effect of perceived choice, expected outcome, and observed outcome of an action on the causal attributions of actors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(2), 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggott, R. (2005). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England. Public Administration, 83(3), 533–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “Good Governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Downe, J. (2008). Innovation in public engagement and co-production of services. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production – How users and communities contribute to public services. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 35–60). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. London, UK: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Helderman, J.-K. (2012). The conditions for successful co-production in housing: A case study of German housing cooperatives. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 169–191). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services – An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the co-production concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2010). Building the big society. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/building-the-big-society.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., Sedikides, C., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2003). The impact of relative group status: Affective, perceptual and behavioral consequences. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 325–343). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. E. (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. (2005). “Working Together”: Neighbourhood watch, reassurance policing and the potential of partnerships. Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from http://aic.gov.au/documents/6/2/B/%7B62B8017A-508F-432E-A0E6-A067BA7F7355%7Dtandi303.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. (2011). Towards developing new partnerships in public services: Users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in England and Sweden. Public Administration, 89(3), 933–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. H., Arkin, R. M., Gleason, J. M., & Johnston, S. (1974). Effect of expected and observed outcome of an action on the differential causal attributions of actor and observer. Journal of Personality, 42(1), 62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1268–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Tomkins, A. J., & Zillig, L. M. P. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 815–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kings’ speech, The Netherlands. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/toespraken/2013/09/17/troonrede-2013.html.
   Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1996). Causality orientations and the disappearance of the self-serving bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(1), 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C. H., & Fisher, G. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery – The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44( Special issue: Citizenship and public administration), 178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler, E., Parrado, S., Bovaird, T., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). “If you want to go fast, walk alone. If you want to go far, walk together”: Citizens and the co-production of public services. Birmingham, UK: Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• MacStravic, S. (2000). The downside of patient empowerment. Health Forum Journal, 43(1), 30–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L. (2006). Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1068–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., … Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. L. (1984). Citizen participation in the coproduction of urban services. Urban Affairs Review, 19(4), 431–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services – Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2009). A democratic architecture for the welfare state. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pontes, M, & Pontes, N. (1997). Variables that influence consumers’ inferences about physician ability and accountability. Health Care Management Review, 22(2), 7–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Bierbrauer, G., & Polly, S. (1974). Attribution of educational outcomes by professional and nonprofessional instructors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 609–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1100–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R., & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanborn, P. G. (1996). A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research. Quality and Quantity, 30(1), 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennen, H., & Herzberger, S. (1987). Depression, self-esteem, and the absence of self-protective attributional biases. Journal of Personality, 52(1), 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society, 30(2), 166–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2007). Governing welfare: The third sector and the challenges to the Swedish welfare state (Doctoral thesis). Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-39
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J. (2012). Co-production and service quality: The case of cooperative childcare in Sweden. Voluntas, 23(4), 1173–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local government in the US. Public Management Review, 15, 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47(2), 245–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar