Post-NPM Reforms or Administrative Hybridization in the French Health Care System?

REFERENCES

• Aberbach, J.D., & Christensen, T. (2005). Citizens and consumers. Public Management Review, 7(2), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & Owen, H. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 130–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMUF (Association des Médecins Urgentistes de France/Association of French emergency Physicians). (2012, March 14). Board Meeting/Conseil d’Administration de l’AMUF. Open Letter to Mr François Hollande, candidate for the French Presidential election. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, P., Exworthy, M., Frosini, F., & Jones, L. (2012). Autonomy and improved performance: Lessons from an NHS policy reform. Public Money & Management, 32(3), 209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Martin, S. (2007). Has devolution improved public services? Public Money and Management, 27(2), 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Van de Walle, S. (2013). New public management and citizens’ perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Public Management Review, 15(5), 762–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belorgey, N. (2010). L’hôpital sous pression. Enquête sur le « nouveau management public ». Paris, France: La Découverte Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Benamouzig, D., & Besancon, J. (2005). Administrer un monde incertain: Les nouvelles bureaucraties techniques. Le cas des agences sanitaires. Sociologie du Travail, 47(3),301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchoufi, M., & Camilleri, J. P. (2012). Santé: Décentralisation et démocratie sanitaire. Paris, France: Le Cercle des Echos. décentralisation-du-système-de-santé-une-mécanique-de-précision
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. (2005). Le renouveau du contrôle des bureaucraties. Informations sociales, (6), 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. (2007). The hidden politics of administrative reform: Cutting French civil service wages with a low-profile instrument. Governance, 20(1), 23–56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. (2009). Réinventer l’Etat. Les réformes de l’administration française. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. (Ed.). (2005). Joined-up government (Vol. 5). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boissier, P. (2012). 2012 Hospital report. Paris, France: IGAS.
   Google Scholar
• Bordogna, L., & Neri, S. (2011). Convergence towards an NPM programme or different models? Public service employment relations in Italy and France. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2311–2330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, I., & Didier, E. I. (2013). Benchmarking. L’Etat sous pression statistique. Paris, France: Zones.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Chichester, UK: Wiley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bumgarner, J., & Newswander, C. B. (2012). Governing alone and with partners presidential governance in a post-NPM environment. Administration & Society, 44(5), 546–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J. (2008). Bad samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. (1989). Core public sector reform in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Public Money & Management, 9(1), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2012). Global ideas and modern public sector reforms: A theoretical elaboration and empirical discussion of a neoinstitutional theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(6), 635–653.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Democracy and administrative policy: Contrasting elements of New Public Management (NPM) and post-NPM. European Political Science Review, 3(01), 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2012). Welfare reform and «wicked issues» – From coupling to de-coupling? Bergen, Norway: Stein Rokkam Centre for Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Clavreul, L. (2010). Les soins médicaux: Une culture régionale. Le Monde, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., Comín, F., & Fuentes, D. D. (2005). Empowering Europe’s citizens? Public Management Review, 7(3), 417–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A. (2012). The French state and its territorial challenges. Public Administration, 90(2), 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colla, C. H., Escarce, J. J., Buntin, M. B., & Sood, N. (2010). Effects of competition on the cost and quality of inpatient rehabilitation care under prospective payment. Health Services Research, 45(6p2), 1981–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortat, A., Daumas, J. C., Chatriot, A., Fraboulet, D., Fridenson, P., Joly, H., Lalouette, J. D., Chabaud-Rychter, V., Descoutures, A.-M., Devreux et E. Varikas (dir.), Sous., De Araújo, J. F. F. E., Branco, A., & Francisco, J. (2009). Implementing performance‐based management in the traditional bureaucracy of Portugal. Public Administration, 87(3), 557–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couty, E. (2013). The hospital trust pact. Special report to the French Minister of Health. Paris, France: General Accounting Office.
   Google Scholar
• Demirag, I., & Khadaroo, I. (2008). Accountability and value for money in private finance initiative contracts. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(4), 455–478.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Denord, F. (2007). Néo-libéralisme, version française: histoire d’une idéologie politique. París: Demopolis.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, M. (2006). Patient choice and medicine in health care: Responsibilization, governance and proto-professionalization. Public Management Review, 8(3), 449–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, A., Storey, J., & Rosete, A. A. (2010). Accountability of foundation trusts in the English NHS: Views of directors and governors. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15(2), 82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNLF (National Delegation against Fraud/Delegation Nationale a La Lutte Contre la Fraude). (2012). The fight against fraud. The 2012 year in review. Paris, France: Ministry of Finances and Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, W. (2005). The rise and demise of the new public management. Post-Autistic Economics Review, 33(14), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• DREES. (2009). Report of the evaluation committee on t2a. Paris, France: Ministry of Labour, Employment, and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G., & Chapman, J. (2010). New millennium, new public management and the New Zealand model. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(3), 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3), 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EHFCN. (2010). Annual report: Improving European healthcare system by reducing losses to healthcare fraud and corruption. Retrieved from The European Healthcare Fraud and Corruption Network website: http://www.ehfcn.org/fraud-corruption/facts-and-figures
   Google Scholar
• Elzinga, A. (2010). Systemic limitations of citizen participation in dominant policymaking regimes. td-Conference 2010: Implementation in inter-and transdisciplinary research, td-net for transdisciplinary research, Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Enthoven, A. C. (1993). The history and principles of managed competition. Health Affairs, 12(Suppl. 1), 24–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federation Hospitalières Privée. (2012). Sectoral report on private clinics and hospitals. Paris, France: Montaigne Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1999). Ethics and the new managerialism. Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 4(2), 299–324.
   Google Scholar
• General Inspectorate for Social Affairs/General Inspectorate for Finance. (2012). Recommendations for achieving the health care expenditures national objective 2013–2017 (Propositions pour la Maîtrise de l’ONDAM 2013–2017). Paris, France: Ministry of Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J. R. (2011). Making markets in the welfare state: The politics of varying market reforms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., & Wallis, J. (Eds.). (2009). International handbook of public management reform. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., & Wallis, J. (2010). Two myths of convergence in public management reform. Public Administration, 88(4), 1099–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2007). Report from the social security finance inspectorate.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2013a). Chapitre I – Santé et cohésion sociale Les restructurations hospitalières: trois illustrations des difficultés rencontrées. Retrieved from http://www.ccomptes.fr/Publications/Publications/Rapport-public-annuel-2013
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2013b). Cost of the patient medical file. Paris, France: French National Assembly, Finance, General Economy, Budgetary Control Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. (2006). Theoretical faith and practical works: De-autonomizing and joining-up in the New Zealand state sector. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modern state. London, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., & Lonti, Z. (2008). Chasing shadows? Performance measurement of policy advice in New Zealand government departments. Public Administration, 86(3), 837–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gridchyna, I., Aulois-Griot, M., Maurain, C., & Bégaud, B. (2012). How innovative are pharmaceutical innovations? The case of medicines financed through add-on payments outside of the French DRG-based hospital payment system. Health Policy, 104(1), 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. (2012). From innovation to convention: Legitimate citizen participation in local governance. Local Government Studies, 38(4), 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jowell, J., & Oliver, D. (Eds.). (2007). The changing constitution (7th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, T. (2010). Citizens, co-producers, customers, clients, captives? A critical review of consumerism and public services 1. Public Management Review, 12(3), 439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbberling, J., & Schroeders, N. (2010). Ethical insolvency–losing medical identity in the DRG era. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 135(38), 1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolthoff, E., Huberts, L., & Van den Heuvel, H. (2007). The ethics of new public management: Is integrity at stake? Public Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 399–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kragh, J. P., Maltha, N. L., & Sognstrup, H. (2002). Professions, institutional dynamics, and new public management in the Danish hospital field. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1555–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Kron, B. (2014). Crise de l’hôpital et du système de soins: un état des lieux [Hospital and health system crisis: A situation analysis ]. Paris, France: Contrepoints.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2008). The NPM agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. W., & Gilman, S. C. (2005). The ethics challenge in public service: A problem-solving guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lippi, A., Giannelli, N., Profeti, S., & Citroni, G. (2008). Adapting public–private governance to the local context: The case of water and sanitation services in Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 619–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Ae Chun, S. (2012). Open government and public participation: Issues and challenges in creating public value. Information Polity, 17(2), 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. (2008). What is a Neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mas, B., Pierru, F., Smolski, N., & Torrielli, R. (2011). L’Hôpital en réanimation. Paris, France: Éditions du croquant.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, P., Mitra, M., Vrangbæk, K., Neby, S., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2013). Reshaping public accountability: Hospital reforms in Germany, Norway and Denmark. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 249–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. (2009). Reflections: Institutional theory and world society. In G. Krücken & G. S. Drori (Eds.), World society: The writings of John W. Meyer (pp. 36–63). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Gili, S. D., & Hokyu, H. (2006). World society and the proliferation of formal organization. In Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (Eds.) Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 25–49). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelot, X., & Rodrigues, J. M. (2008). DRGS in France. In J. R. Kimberly, G. D. Pouvourville, & T. A. D’Aunno (Eds.), The globalization of managerial innovation in health care (pp. 116–143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minc. A. (1994). La France de l’an 2000. Paris, France: Commissariat général du Plan, Éditions Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Minvielle, E. (2006). New public management à la française: The case of regional hospital agencies. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 753–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalwoga, M., & Van Dijk Meine, P. (2013). New public management reforms and efficiency in urban water service delivery in developing countries: Blessing or fad Public Works Management & Policy, 18, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Neild, R. R. (2002). Public corruption: The dark side of social evolution. London, UK: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T (1997a). Reinventing Government – How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley:13. Auflage.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1997). Banishing bureaucracy: The five strategies for reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D., & Halligan, J. (Eds.). (2013). Crossing boundaries in public management and policy: The international experience (Vol. 15). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Or, Z. (2007). Hospital 2007. Paris, France: Health Policy Monitor.
   Google Scholar
• Or, Z. (2009). Update on new regional health governance. Paris, France: Health Policy Monitor.
   Google Scholar
• Or, Z. (2010). Activity-based payment in hospitals: Evaluation. Paris, France: Health Policy Monitor.
   Google Scholar
• Or, Z., & Bellanger, M. (2011). France: Implementing homogeneous patient groups in a mixed market (pp. 221–242). Paris, France: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1997). Banishing bureaucracy: The five strategies for reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1997). Reinventing government – How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., Cunill Grau, N., & Zaltsman, A. (2004). Performance evaluation, public management improvement and democratic accountability: Some lessons from Latin America. Public Management Review, 6(2), 229–251.
   Google Scholar
• Overeem, P., & Tholen, B. (2011). After managerialism MacIntyre’s lessons for the study of public administration. Administration & Society, 43(7), 722–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2009). Reinventing governance, reinventing democracy? Policy & Politics, 37(4), 591–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined‐up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (Ed.). (2013). Context in public policy and management: The missing link? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, A. (2007). Changing the culture of contracting: Funding for outcomes. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 31, 158.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, X., Russell, L. B., Valiyeva, E., & Miller, J. E. (2011). ‘Quicker and sicker’ under Medicare’s prospective payment system for hospitals: New evidence on an old issue from a national longitudinal survey. Bulletin of Economic Research, 63(1), 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramia, G., & Carney, T. (2010). The Rudd government’s employment services agenda: Is it post‐NPM and why is that important? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(3), 263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaers, A. M., & De Graaf, G. (2014). Public values in public–private partnerships. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2009). Bringing the politics back in: Public value in Westminster parliamentary government. Public Administration, 87(2), 161–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. S., Normand, S. L. T., Wang, Y., Ko, D. T., Chen, J., Drye, E. E., & Krumholz, H. M. (2010). Hospital volume and 30-day mortality for three common medical conditions. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(12), 1110–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouban, L. (Ed.). (1999). Citizens and the new governance: Beyond new public management ( Vol. 3). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saint Martin, D. (2005). Management consultancy. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn Jr., & Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 671–694). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, A. (2008). Evaluating the new governance of the welfare state in Finland. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(10–11), 1242–1258.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkozy, N. (2008). Press conference. Presentation of the HPST Act. Thursday, April, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie, D. J. (2012). Book Review of Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert (2011) public management reform: A comparative analysis–new public management, governance, and the Neo–Weberian state. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 180–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2006). La culture du nouveau capitalisme. Paris, France: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., Malik, A., & Yaqub, M. Z. (2010). Accounting for merger: The case of HM revenue and customs. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 18, 122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Siltala, J. (2013). New public management the evidence-based worst practice? Administration & Society, 45(4), 468–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonet, D. (2011). The new public management theory and the reform of European health care systems: An international comparative perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(12), 815–826.
   Google Scholar
• Simonet, D. (2013). The new public management theory in the British health care system: A critical review. Administration & Society, doi:10.1177/0095399713485001
   Google Scholar
• Smolski, N., Mas, B., & Pierru, F. (2011). L’hôpital en réanimation: Le sacrifice organisé d’un service public emblématique (No. 123456789/10152). Paris, France: Paris Dauphine University.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, D. (2010). International profiles of health care systems. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Stace, H., & Cumming, J. (2006). Contracting between government and the voluntary sector: Where to from here? Policy quarterly, 2(4), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2010). Skills building for area management: Lessons from regional locality management. Public Money & Management, 30(5), 285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepas III, J. J., Pracht, E. E., Orban, B. L., & Flint, L. M. (2013). High-volume trauma centers have better outcomes treating traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 74(1), 143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: A comparative case study of insurance physicians and secondary school teachers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(4), 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lawton, A. (2011). Competing values in public management: Introduction to the symposium issue. Public Management Review, 13(3), 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 264–285.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2013). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronesi, G., Kirkpatrick, I., & Vallascas, F. (2014). Does clinical management improve efficiency? Evidence from the English National Health Service. Public Money & Management, 34(1), 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Maravic, P. (2007). Public management reform and corruption – Conceptualizing the unintended consequences. Administration and Public Management Review, 8, 126–43.
   Google Scholar
• West, K., & Davis, P. (2011). What is the public value of government action? Towards a (new) pragmatic approach to values questions in public endeavours. Public Administration, 89(2), 226–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcombe, J. (2008). Contributions and challenges of ‘new public management’: New Zealand since 1984. Policy Quarterly, 4(3), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. (Ed.). (2003). Evaluation in public-sector reform: Concepts and practice in international perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar