A Public Administration Headache: An Evaluation Analysis of Prison Policy and Recidivism Toward Social Reintegration

REFERENCES

• Araújo, J. F. E. (2000). Hierarquia e Mercado: A Experiência Recente da Administração Gestionária (Comunicação apresentada no 2). Dos meios aos resultados, Lisboa: Encontro INA – Moderna Gestão Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, J. F. (2004). A reforma administrativa em Portugal: Em busca de um novo paradigma. Revista da Eurorrexión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, (6), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Arun, R., & Beattie, I. R. (1999). High school experience and the risk of adult incarceration. Criminology, 37(3), 515–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheliotis, L. K., & Xenakis, S. (2010). What’s neoliberalism got to do with it? Towards a political economy of punishment in Greece. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10(4), 353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2010). Ideology? What ideology? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10(4), 387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culle, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 48S–65S.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, J. F., & Andrade, M. C. (1997). Criminologia: O Homem Delinquente e a Sociedade Criminógena. Coimbra, Portugal: Coimbra Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Q. (2011). An evaluation analysis of e-government development by local authorities in Australia. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(14), 926–934.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, Jaime R. S. e Cardoso, Margarida G.M.S. (2007), Mixture-Model Cluster Analysis using Information Theoretical Criteria, Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(2), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, Jaime R. S. (2009), Customer Satisfaction Study via a Latent Segment Model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 352–359.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. R. S. (2010). Análise de Dados Univariados e Multivariados. Londres, Reino Unido: Editora Causa das Regras.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. R. S. (2013a). Clustering in the field of social sciences: That’s your choice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(5), 403–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. R. S. (2013b). How satisfied are citizens with public hospitals’ service? International Journal of Healthcare and Quality Assurance, 26(6), 522–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). La arqueologia del saber. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. (2003). Can we close the revolving door? Recidivism vs. employment of ex-offenders in the U.S. the urban institute reentry roundtable (Discussion Paper No. 2, pp. 1–19) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, V., Stangeland, P., & Redondo, S. (1999). Princípios de Criminología. Valencia, Spain: Tirant Lo Blanch.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2008). Sociologia (6.a Edição.). Lisboa, Portugal: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, C., Duarte, M., & Almeida, J. (2004). Crimes, penas e reinserção social: Um olhar sobre o caso português. Braga, Portugal: Atas do V Congresso Português de Sociologia, Sociedades Contemporâneas, Reflexividade e Ação Universidade do Minho, Campus Gualtar.
   Google Scholar
• Grubesic, T. H. & Mack, E. A. (2008). Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. M., and Beck, A. J. (2006), Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, C. H. (2001). Criminología (Parte General y Especial). Madrid, Spain: Dykinson.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles & policy subsystems. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampousaki, S. (2010). Working poor in Europe: Greece. INE/GSEE submission to a comparative study by the European Working Conditions Observatory (EWCO). Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/studies/tn0910026s/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2010). Sciences wacquant and civic sociology: ‘Formative intentions’ and formative experiences. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10(4), 405–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2000). Prison use and social control. Criminal Justice, 3, 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, A. G.-P. (2001). Criminología: Una Introducción a sus Fundamentos Teóricos. Valencia, Spain: Tirant Lo Blanch.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, A. G.-P. (2009). Tratado de Criminología. Valencia, Spain: Tirant Lo Blanch.
   Google Scholar
• Moliné, J., & Pijon, E. (2001). Teorías Criminológicas. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Bosh, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Mozzicafreddo, J. (2001). Modernização da Administração Pública e Poder Político. In J. Mozzicafreddo & J. Gomes (Eds.), Administração e Política: Perspectivas de Reforma na Administração Pública na Europa e nos Estados Unidos (pp. 1–33). Oeiras, Portugal: Celta Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Newburn, M. (2010, July 8). Home birth should be considered a safe option for pregnant women. Guardian. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jul/08/home-birthrisk-babies-die
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., & Kerry, B. (2005). Managing change and innovation in the public service organizations. New York, NY: Routledge- Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquino, G. (2002). Curso de Ciência Política. Cascais, Portugal: Principia, Publicações\Universitárias e Científicas.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, M. Á., & Pérez, F. A. (2002). Nociones de Criminología. Madrid, Spain: Colex.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilvia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safetyand reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public services: Cuts or cultural change in the 1990s? (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the Emperor in this underworld? Public Management, 2(2), 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, S. (2010), Incarceration and Prisoner Reentry in the United States, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper no. 1375–10.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S. C., & Jones, R. S. (1997). Perpectual incarceration machine. Structural impediments to postprison success. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13(1), 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Thompson, M. (2006). Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 281–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009). Prisons of poverty ( expanded ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010). Incarceration and stratification. Annual Review Sociology, 36, 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar