Implementing Performance Budgeting at the State Level: Lessons Learned from New Jersey

References

• Ammons, D. N. (2004). Productivity barriers in the public sector. In Marc Holzer and Seok-Hwan Lee (Ed.), Public productivity handbook (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Ash Center. (2011). Innovations Awards Programs. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/award_landing.html
   Google Scholar
• Bland, R. L., & Clarke, W. (2006). Texas: The use of performance data in budgeting and management. In E. J. Clynch & T. P. Lauth (Eds.), Budgeting in the states: Institutions, processes, and politics (pp. 277–292). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M. (2005). Researching performance measurement system implementation: The dynamics of success and failure. Production Planning and Control, 16(2), 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntz, C. G. (1981). Problems and issues in human service productivity improvement, Public Productivity and Management Review, 5, 299–320.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhead, J. (1956). Government budgeting. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Inner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 29(3/4), 243–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2011). Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: Does it work? The American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkler, S. A. (1991). Performance budgeting. Nursing Economics, 9(6), 401–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmour, J. B., & Lewis, D. E. (2006). Does performance budgeting work? An examination of the office of management and budget’s PART scores. Public Administration Review, 66, 742–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehrig, R. (2008). The role of leadership in building high performing, sustainable, organizations. Government Finance Review, 24(6), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2004). Developing a performance-based culture. Journal for Quality and Participation, 27(1), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, R. J. (2006, Spring). Performance budgeting: Descriptive, allegorical, mythical, and idealistic. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(1), 72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Lee, S. H. (2004). Mastering public productivity and performance improvement: From a productive management perspective. In M. Holzer & S.-H. Lee (Eds.), Public productivity handbook (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. G. (1996). Appraising budget appraisal: Can you take politics out of budgeting? Public Budgeting and Finance, 16(4), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. L., & Holzer, M. (Eds.). (2008). Performance measurement: Building theory, improving practice (pp. 208). New York, NY: M.E. Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klase, A., & Dougherty, M. J. (2008). The impact of performance budgeting on state budget outcomes. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 20(3), 277–298.
   Google Scholar
• Kraychuck, R. S., & Schack, R.W. (1996). Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993. Public Administration Review, 56(4), 348–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, K. T., & Korosec, R. (2009). Implementing organizational reform strategies in state governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 429–452.
   Google Scholar
• Melese, F. (1999, Spring) The latest in performance budgeting: The government performance and results act. The Armed Forces Comptroller, 44(2), 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3),421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucha, M. J. (2011). Effective use of performance budgeting. Government Finance Review, 27(4), 61–63. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from http://0search.proquest.com.liucat.lib.liu.edu/docview/893424740?accountid=12142.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Charitable Trusts. (2008). Grading the States. Retrieved on April 5, 2012 from: http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., & Kelly, J. M. (2006). Performance budgeting in municipal government. Public Performance & Management Review,30(1), 35.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. L., James, F. C., Subramanian, A., Bird, D. A., & Nelson, A. C. (2001, June). Strategic planning for municipal information systems: Some lessons from a large U.S. city. The American Review of Public Administration, 31(2), 139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R. (2010, March). Nonprofits and public administration reconciling performance management and citizen engagement. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(2),129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar