Pursuing Private or Public Accountability in the Public Sector? Applying IPSASs to Define the Reporting Entity in Municipal Consolidation

REFERENCES

• Aiken, M., & Capitanio, C. (1995). Accrual accounting valuations and accountability in government: A potentially pernicious union. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54(4), 564–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anessi Pessina, E., & Steccolini, I. (2007). Effects of budgetary and accruals accounting coexistence: Evidence from Italian local governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(2), 113–131.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. (1978). Financial accounting in non business organizations: An exploratory study of conceptual issues. Stamford, CT: FASB Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. (1983). Tell it like it was: A conceptual framework for financial accounting. Irwin, IL: Homewood.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. (2000). The fatal defect in the federal accounting system. Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(4), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Argento, D., Grossi, G., Tagesson, T., & Collin, S. O. (2000). The externalisation of local public service delivery: Experience in Italy and Sweden. International Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (1999). Public and private sector accounting—The non identical twins. Australian Accounting Review, 9(2), 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2002). Public-sector accounting: A common research framework? Australian Accounting Review, 12(3), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2005). Professional accounting standards and the public sector—A mismatch. Abacus, 41(2), 138–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The harmonization of government financial information systems: The role of the IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 293–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, P., Nwuke, K., Hanson, K., Kariuki, M., Mbugua, K., Ong’ayo, S., & Omurwa, T. (1994). Kenya: Non-governmental health care provision (Working Paper, Data for Decision Making Project). Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Bisogno, M., Santis, S., & Tommasetti, A. (this issue). The definition of control in public sector consolidated financial statements. International Journal of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., Poole, M., & Jenkins, G. (1999). Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. Public Administration, 77(2), 407–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of ‘contextual’ accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(2), 129–169.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (1998). Resisting the new public management-absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(4), 403–435.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, T. M. (2006). Victoria’s accrual output based budgeting system-delivering as promised? Some empirical evidence. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D. (2006). L’esternalizzazione nelle Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Teorie, Politiche ed Esperienze a Livello Internazionale. Roma, Italy: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, F., Dean, G., & Oliver, K. (2003). Corporate collapse: Accounting, regulatory and ethical failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Brecht, R., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: A comparative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., & Neyt, S. (2015). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs). In T. Budding, G. Grossi, & T. Tagesson (Eds.), Public sector accounting (pp. 23–62). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., & Rommel, J. (2006). Governmental accounting reforms: Going back where we belong? (Working Papers) Ghent, Belgium: University of Ghent.
   Google Scholar
• Conn, N. (1996). Reservations about governments producing balance sheets. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(1), 82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte dei Conti. (2010). Indagine sul fenomeno delle partecipazioni in societá ed altri organismi da parte di Comuni e Province, Deliberazione n. 14. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.corteconti.it
   Google Scholar
• Corte dei Conti. (2012). Rapporto 2012 sul coordinamento della Finanza Pubblica. Retrieved January 18, 2013 from http://www.corteconti.it
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Ditillo, A., Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2010). Do environmental and task characteristics matter in the control of externalized local public services? Unveiling the relevance of party characteristics and citizens’ offstage voice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(3), 350–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. (1953). Politics, economics and welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2013). IPSAS in your pocket. Retrieved from http://www.iasplus.com
   Google Scholar
• Dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica. (2006). L’esternalizzazione Strategica nelle Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Roma, Italy: Rubbettino.
   Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A., Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Control patterns in contracting-out relationships: It matters what you do, not who you are. Public Administration. Advance Online Publication. Retrieved January 26, 2015. doi:10.1111/padm.12126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Hyndman, N., Johnsen, A., Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2007). Experiencing institutionalization: The development of new budgets in the UK devolved bodies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(1), 11–40.
   Google Scholar
• Farnham, D., & Horton, S. (1996). Managing public and private organizations. In D. Farnham & S. Horton (Eds.), Managing the new public services. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L., & Fitzgerald, L. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB). (1991). Financial reporting entity. GASB 14. Retrieved June 15, 2014 from http://www.gasb.org
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research. Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. (2009). New development. Consolidated financial reporting as a stimulus for change in Italian local government. Public Money & Management, 29(1), 261–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. (2015). Consolidated financial statements in the public sector. In T. Budding, G. Grossi, & T. Tagesson (Eds.), Public sector accounting (pp. 63–76). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Newberry, S. (2009). Theme: Whole-of-government accounting: International trends. Public Money and Management, 29(4), 209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Soverchia, M. (2011). European commission adoption of IPSAS to reform financial reporting. Abacus, 47(4), 525–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Accounting for public governance. Journal of Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 11(2), 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Tagesson, T. (2008). Consolidated financial reports in local governments: A comparative analysis between IPSAS and SCMA. In S. Jorge (Ed.), Implementing reforms in public sector accounting: Problems, changes and results (pp. 337–349). Coimbra, Portugal: The University of Coimbra Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Thomasson, A. (2011). Jointly owned companies as instrument of local government. Comparative evidence from Sweden and Italy. Policy Studies, 32(3), 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector: Rhetoric or reality? Financial Accountability and Management, 14(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Johnson, M. (1994). Commercialisation of the public sector: Why, how and for what? A prospective view. In K. Whiltshire (Ed.), Governance and economic efficiency (pp. 87–108). Sydney, Australia: CEDA.
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2010). Key characteristics of the public sector. Staff Draft. Toronto, Canada: IFAC. Retrieved from http://www.ifac.org
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2013a). Conceptual framework for general purposes financial reporting by public sector entities (Final Pronouncement). Toronto, Canada: IFAC. Retrieved October 1, 2014 from http://www.ifac.org
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2013b). Exposure draft on consolidated financial statement. Toronto, Canada: IFAC. Retrieved October 1, 2014 from http://www.ifac.org
   Google Scholar
• IRPA. (2012). Il capitalismo municipale. Rapporto 1/2012. Retrieved October 1, 2014 from http://www.astrid-online.it
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2007). The functions of government accounting in Europe. Revista de Estudos Politécnicos Polytechnical Studies Review, 4(7), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1999). Accounting and the new public management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalising modernity? Financial Accountability and Management, 15(3/4), 201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. (1995). AAS 29: A critique. Readings in accounting developments in the public sector 1993-1994. Melbourne, Australia: ASCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2011). Accounting change: Explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(1), 27–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Accounting, innovation and public-sector change. Translating reforms into change? Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(4–5), 319–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., & Matthews, R. (1993). What’s wrong with ED 55 (Financial Forum). Melbourne, Australia: ASCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuccio, M., & Steccolini, I. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in local authorities: A new Italian fashion? Public Management Review, 7(2), 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautz, R. K. (1981). Financial reporting: Should government emulate business? Journal of Accountancy, 152(2), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mautz, R. K. (1988). Monuments, mistakes and opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 2(2), 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (1993). Public management: From imitation to innovation. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Micallef, F., & Peirson, G. (1997). Financial reporting of cultural, heritage, scientific and community collections. Australian Accounting Review, 7(11), 28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mink, M., & de Haan, J. (2006). Are there political budget cycles in the Euro area? European Union Politics, 7(2), 191–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen, N. (2002). The case for cameral accounting. Financial Accountability and Management, 18(1), 39–72.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, N., & Näsi, S. (1998). The contingency model of governmental accounting innovations: A discussion. European Accounting Review, 7(2), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, N., & Näsi, S. (1999). Comparing cameral and accrual accounting in local governments. In A. D. Bac (Ed.), International comparative issues in government accounting (pp. 135–157). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, N., & Näsi, S. (2000). Is accrual accounting appropriate for governmental organizations? Paper presented at the EIASM Conference on Accounting Auditing and Management in Public Sector Reforms, Zaragoza, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Montesinos, V., Pina, V., & Vela, J. M. (1995). Comparative analysis of governmental accounting systems in OECD countries: An empirical approach. In V. Montesinos & J. M. Vela (Eds.), International research in public sector accounting, reporting and auditing (pp. 161–184). Valencia, Spain: Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Economicas.
   Google Scholar
• Mulas-Granados, C. (2003). The political and economic determinants of budgetary consolidation in Europe. European Political Economy Review, 1(1), 31–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nasi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2008). Implementation of accounting reforms: An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Public Management Review, 10(2), 173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldin-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2012). Comparative international accounting. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. (1993). Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(2), 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C. (2000). Decision-making success in public, private and third sector organizations: Finding sector dependent best practice. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 77–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, O., Humphrey, C., & Guthrie, J. (1998). International experiences with “New” Public Financial Management (NPFM) reforms: New world? Small world? Better world?”. In O. Olson, C. Humphrey, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Global warning: Debating international developments in new public financial management (pp. 17–48). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag As.
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, L. (2013). Reluctance of a developed country to choose international public sector accounting standards of IFAC. A critical case. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(1), 272–275.
   Google Scholar
• Pallot, J. (1992). Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(1), 38–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pallott, J. T. (1990). The nature of public sector assets: A reply to Mautz. Accounting Horizons, 4(2), 79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2004). Constitutional rules and fiscal policy outcomes. American Economic Review, 94(1), 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.
   Google Scholar
• PwC. (2012). IPSAS in a nutshell. From principles to practice. Brussels, Belgium: PwC.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H., Backoff, R., & Levine, C. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring, P., & Perry, J. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 276–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (2002). Research method & methodology in finance & accounting (2nd ed.). London, UK: Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, M., & Svensson, J. (2006). Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90(8), 1367–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2011). Research methods in accounting (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Ranson, S. (1988). Management in the public domain. Public Money and Management, 8(2), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T. (2009). Debate: Arguments for proportional consolidation; the case of Swedish local government. Public Money and Management, 29(4), 215–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T. (2015). Conditions for and users of public sector accounting. In T. Budding, G. Grossi, & T. Tagesson (Eds.), Public sector accounting (pp. 1–7). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T., & Grossi, G. (2012). The materiality of consolidated financial reporting—An alternative approach to IPSASB. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(1), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, J. (2004). Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustments. Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 2447–2468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H., & van Helden, G. J. (2000). Accounting change in Dutch government: Exploring the gap between expectations and realizations. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Tujula, M., & Wolswijk, G. (2007). Budget balances in OECD countries: What makes them change? Empirica, 34(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, G., & Zald, M. (1973). The political economy of public organizations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar