Therefore, Is Bureaucracy Dead? Making a Case for Complementarity of Paradigms in Public Administrative Thinking and Discourse

References

• Adusah-Karikari, A., & Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in the public service? A critical analysis of the challenges confronting women in the civil service of Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration. 36(9), 568–580.
   Google Scholar
• Albrow, M. (1970). Bureaucracy. London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & O'Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (3–4), 171–191. doi:10.1080/01900690902732731
   Google Scholar
• Basu, R. (1994). Public administration: Concepts and theories (3rd ed.). New Delhi, India: Sterling Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W. H., & McClenahan Jr, W. M. (2003). The market, the state, and the export-import bank of the United States, 1934–2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2004). Auditing culture: The subsidised cultural sector in the new public management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2), 183–202. doi:10.1080/10286630042000255808
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, A., & Bennet, D. (2012). The evolution of organizations: From bureaucracy to intelligent complex adaptive systems. Retrieved August 26, 2014, from http://www.mountainquestinstitute.com/papers.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. (1972). The decline of bureaucracy and organisations of the future (pp. 106–116). ( J. M. Shepard, Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyte, H. C. (2011). Everyday politics: Reconnecting citizens and public life. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. S. (1977). “Reforming” the bureaucracy: Some suggestions for the new president. Public Administration Review, 37(2), 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2001, March). Dissolving the public realm? Paper presented at the Workshop “Local Democracy. . . An Uncertain Future?” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2004). Changing welfare, changing states: New directions in social policy. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, D., & Simard, É. (2012). Grassroots in Quebec: How new public management and corporate culture are trickling down. Studies in Political Economy, 89, 105.
   Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2002). The new public service. New York, NY: ME Sharpe Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2011). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Catlaw, T. (2014). Theories of public organization (7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3–10. doi:10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2007). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. New York: ME Sharpe Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2006). Public sector reforms and transformation: Implications for development administration. In A. S. Huque, & H. Zafarullah (Eds.), International development governance (pp. 545–558). Boca Raton, FL: CRC, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2009). Bureaucracy, administration and politics. In A. Farazmand, (Ed.), Bureaucracy and Administration (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy: A theoretical analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245–258. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0137-0
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (2014). Public value and the integrative mind: How multiple sectors can collaborate in city building. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 457–464. doi:10.1111/puar.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R., & Johnson, C. (1998). The perception of power: Dependence and legitimacy in conflict. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 16–32. doi:10.2307/2787055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1996). Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56, 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937). Papers on the science of public administration. New York, NY: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P. (1994). The bureaucratic experience: A critique of life in the modern organization. (4th ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P. (2008). The bureaucratic experience: The post-modern challenge. Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1992). The promise and paradox of civil service reform. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalambokidis, L. (2014). Creating public value with tax and spending policies: The view from public economics. Public Administration Review, 74 (4), 519–526. doi:10.1111/puar.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinkos, N. (2004). The social foundations of the bureaucratic order. Organization, 11(1), 13–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S. J. (1999). Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 7093.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B. (2014). Unraveling representative bureaucracy: A systematic analysis of the literature. Administration & Society, 46(4), 395–421. doi:10.1177/0095399712459724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F., & DiIulio, J. J. (1995). Inside the reinvention machine. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F., & Milward, H. B. (1996). The state of public management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Kant, S. (2005). Bureaucracy and new management paradigms: Modeling foresters’ perceptions regarding community-based forest management in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 651–669. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Review, 6 (4), 391–409. doi:10.1177/107808747100600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, S. R. (1998). Administrative thinkers. New Dehli: India: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K., & Paqué, R. (1935). Mensch und gesellschaft im zeitalter des umbaus. Leiden, Germany: AW Sijthoff.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved 25 September 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2570634
   Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. doi:10.1080/01900690902732632
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. (2002). Post-bureaucracy or post-public good? New public management and the policy process constraints in Ontario. Working Paper of the Canadian Political Science Association. Retrieved from http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2006/o’brien.pdf [Accessed August 18, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1997). Banishing bureaucracy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1994). Managing the hollow state. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(3–4), 739–756. doi:10.1080/01900699408524915
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2000). Citizens versus the new public manager: The problem of mutual empowerment. Administration & Society, 32(1), 9–28. doi:10.1177/00953990022019335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (1998). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. C. (2014). Bureaucracy and its “Objectives”? A response to Alexandru Roman. Administration & Society, 46(7), 853–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, A. V. (2014). Counterbalancing perspectives on the current administrative Telos of American bureaucracies. Administration & Society, 46(7), 825–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross‐Smith, A., & Kornberger, M. (2004). Gendered rationality? A genealogical exploration of the philosophical and sociological conceptions of rationality, masculinity and organization. Gender, Work & Organization, 11 (3), 280–305. doi:10.1111/gwao.2004.11.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328. doi:10.1177/0146167200263001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of Government: A guide to the new governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (1998). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of Performance: Organizational and Service Improvement in the Public Domain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teodoro, M. P. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. M., Walker, H. A., & Zelditch, J. M. (1986). Legitimacy and collective action. Social Forces, 65(2), 378–404. doi:10.1093/sf/65.2.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventriss, C. (2000). New public management: An examination of its influence on contemporary public affairs and its impact on shaping the intellectual agenda of the field. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22(3), 500–518.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York, NY: Ronald Press Co.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. (2006). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. A., & Zelditch, J. M. (1993). Power, legitimacy and the stability of authority: A theoretical research program. In J. Berger, & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 364–381). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2007). The police in America, an introduction (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946/1958). Essays in Sociology. (H. Gerth & C. Mills, Eds. And Trans.) In M. Weber, H. Gerth, & C. Mills. From Max Weber. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. (A. Henderson, & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society (G. Roth and C. Wittich, Eds.). New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, W. F. (1995). Controlling the bureaucracy: Institutional constraints in theory and practice. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (2000). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. J., & Walker, H. A. (1984). Legitimacy and stability of authority. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (pp. 1–27). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar